RE: Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: Cultural Heritage
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,
(OPENING) It services no useful purpose to argue and quibbling over passages just for the purpose of projecting some meaningless, unfathomable, false or inaccurate information, that which is deliberately intended to deceive the readership.
It offers no defense what so ever in the debate. It is, without question, attempting to sound as if it is the product of logic and critical thinking; yet is not able to be maintained a defense or maintain a challenge against any attack or objection that might present itself to be sound and valid.
(COMMENT)
This is clearly a false "and" ambiguous statement of a material fact made by anti-Israeeli, pro-Palestinians and customary/international humanitarian law. party which affects the other party's decision in agreeing to a contract.
Israeli component segments of the population is NOT now, not has it ever been, and shows no sign of becoming any imported colonial settlers.
(COMMENT)
Going back a millennium in the history of the sovereign powers over the Levant, there is no record of an Arab Palestinian self-governing state, nation, or country.
(COMMENT)
Israeli may have superimposed its sovereign boundaries over top portions some portions of the ceasefire lines established by the various military authorities, the intent of certain passages relating to the use of military ceasefire lines as an intentional "permanent boundary" was not the what the ceasefire lines were intended to be. Military Officers of the Armed Forces do not generally act on behalf of a governments in the agreement on permanents political boundaries, borders, or subdivisions.
The Armistice Agreements do NOT prohibit the use of any demarcation lines by the parties negotiating a permanent peace.
(COMMENT)
Again, this statement lies in the face of the International Community legal finding.
(COMMENT)
To this very day, most of the permanent boundaries and demarcations for sovereign territories are initially established that way.
(WITHIN THE LAST TEN YEARS)
How did the Peoples Republic of China takeover a very substantial portion of the South China Sea?
In the Black Sea and Crimea Region - much of the region was seized by Russia.
(COMMENT)
This is ambiguous.
Most Respectfully,
R