Once again you make the same mistake that you seem to always make. As a matter of fact I have corrected you so many times, I think that it is no longer a mistake, but rather an attempt to rewrite history ie. a lie. The Jews are not indigenous to the area, the Canaanite's are the only indigenous people of the land mass that we are talking about. The proto-Canaanite's had farming villages in the area around 6700 BC and thriving cities around 3200 BC. Abraham's Tribe and Lot's Tribe did not show up in the area until around 2000 BC. Now I know you are going to say the the Jews emerged from the Canaanite's but that is simply not true, while there probably was some mixing between the tribes it was at best minimal as the Hebrews had strict laws against intermarriage.
Even if there was intermarriage being indigenous to the area does not follow bloodlines it concerns itself more with culture and ethnicity and there are definite differences between the Canaanite's and the Hebrews/Jews/Israelis. The Hebrews came from Northern Mesopotamia and at the time of their entry into Canaan they were nomadic herding tribes that were extremely clannish. The anthropologists determined this by examining the technological differences between . The Canaanite's at this time were tool makers with metal whereas the Hebrews were tool makers with stone. The Hebrews were still a polytheistic people whereas the Canaanite were slowly moving in a monotheistic manner. The main occupations of the Hebrews were farming and herdsman whereas the main occupations of the Canaanite's were progressing toward trade and industry.
The two distinct peoples were neither culturally nor ethnically similar.
Therefor the Jews are not indigenous to the area. MJB study a little history before you make a greater fool of yourself than you already have. But maybe the problem is that you like playing the fool !!!
