- Dec 6, 2009
- 77,661
- 4,167
- 1,815
- Thread starter
- #15,361
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
(COMMENT)
(COMMENT)You are still implying that the Palestinians are the aggressors.
What direct military advantage are they anticipating?◈ TO: Rule 14 -- the question of excessive force in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.
People attempting to go back to their own homes are called insurgents.Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents,
RE: Palestine Today?
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,
This cartoon is cute, but a poor analogy. This is about the idea that Israel is using excessive combat power in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.
BLUF: Bullshit...
(COMMENT)
This topic is really a propaganda effort to change the discussion:
◈ FROM: Rule 23 -- to avoid locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas.◈ TO: Rule 14 -- the question of excessive force in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.
The concrete and direct military objective is to make the hostile action (rocket launches) by the Arab Palestinians so costly that it totally suppresses hostile rocket fire as a tactic (criminal acts committed hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) to further ideological goal).
IF the hostile Arab Palestinians continue to launch rocket as a tactic to coerce the Israel government,
THEN the first application of fire was insufficient and additional targeted missions are necessary.
This brings up the issue of the HoAP using the general population as cover and concealment of rocket launches (human shields) (see Rule 97) as a preventative measure against Israeli counter-fire. The HoAP intentionally avoid their responsibility to do everything feasible must be done to separate military objectives from the civilian population.
(COMMENT)You are still implying that the Palestinians are the aggressors.
The HoAP insurgency has grown and evolved since the time of the Six-Day War (1967) to the present. It has many heads that present themselves as Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters. They do so as an effort calculated to create and "disrupt" the safe atmosphere of fear in the minds of the Israeli citizen. The Israelis want to change the paradigm one in which rocket fire is a fact of daily life to one that is safe and secure. The HoAP has the exact opposite as an objective in mind.
The real agenda, obscured by the HoAP, is to obscure the fact that the HoAP are violating two international laws:
◈ The prohibition of indiscriminate attacks is set forth in Article 51(4) of Additional Protocol I.◈ Rule 23. Each party to the conflict must, to the extent feasible, avoid locating military objectives within or near densely populated areas; set forth in Article 58(b) of Additional Protocol I. ◈ 1997 International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings, set forth in A/RES/52/164.HoAP indiscriminately launch against a place of public use, with intent to kill or cause serious bodily injury or cause extensive destruction. Finally, the use of armed force by the HoAP against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of Israel is, without question, the very image of the aggressor.
Most Respectfully,
R
What Israeli border have the Palestinian ever crossed?Finally, the use of armed force by the HoAP against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of Israel is, without question, the very image of the aggressor.
(COMMENT)What direct military advantage are they anticipating?◈ TO: Rule 14 -- the question of excessive force in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated.
Take out Hamas? Fail!
Stop rockets? Fail!
Bomb the shit out of a lot of civilians? Ahh, there you go!