RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ Coyote, et al,
BLUF: Yes!
(With the reservations as noted.)
I would agree that, in certain settlement areas
(certainly not all), there appears to exist a cultural "feud"
(prolonged hostility) between the Jewish Settlers and the localized Arab Palestinians. This is not so different from the clan conflicts in the Northern Appalachian Mountains in America
(the Hatfield 'v' McCoy controversy being one of the most famous). But just as the clan feuds of the Northern Appalachian Mountains were localized and not indicative of the overall relationship between the two general populations, the long persistence of clan-like confrontations has reached epic proportions, not unlike Northern Appalachian Mountain feuds
(ie Hatfield-McCoy).
Then would you agree that Jewish stone throwers (as in the settlers stoning Palestinians) acting the same as the Palestinians?
(COMMENT)
The very poor analysis
(by both sides and media observers seeking fame) of the adverse confrontations between the Israeli Settler 'v' Local Arab Palestinians in now almost indistinguishable from the reasons and political framework of the overarching nature of the generalized acts of terror between the major terrorist groups and government-sponsored terrorism directed against the Israeli civilian population.
(EXEMPLARS)
The feud between the Jewish Settlers and the localized Arab Palestinians is NOT strictly for the same purposes as that expressed by the Negotiation Affairs Department (PLO-NAD). It is very similar
(in many cases) to the complexion behind the "Wyoming Range War" typified by the 'INVADER" notion between the new Farming Homesteaders and the Cattleman Barons of the Stock-Grower's Association. Similarly, there was an atmosphere of corruptions, intimidation, and political conniving manipulators
(AKA: Robber Barons) that fleeced property owners, farmers, and ranchers for railroad right-of-ways; or that of the organized criminal claim jumpers for gold and silver mining; or that of the land grabbing of oil-rich land from the American Indians. All these examples used an element of induced terror to accomplish the end result. Why?
(RHETORICAL) Because of the overt nature of the activity. And while everyone looked one the criminal takeover of Chicago and the Tammany Hall political corruption New York political machine were done in the open
(meaning everyone understood the illegal shadow of the activities), often maintaining control through intimidation and murder
(ie "terrorism").
Today, the criminal gangs of Los Angeles use terrorism to maintain their control over large expanses of the area and prevent enforcement and prosecution for their activities. This is done through neighborhood intimidation through terrorism. Again, this is not considered. But you can go into any of the street gang territories
(of any color and ethnicity) and feel the impact.
The application of the description of terrorism has to be focused on the type, kind, and magnitude.

Most Respectfully,
R