Palestine Today

[abi]

Palestine Today
※→abi, et al,

You are an idiot.

The brave soldier hit her first. It's funny watching people lie about what is obvious in a video.

(COMMENT)

It is quite apparent to me that the young girls:

• Were not under apprehension.
• The girls approached the Israeli personnel of their own free will.
• The girls instigated the confrontation and initiated the assault first.
• That it was the girls could have walked away at any time.

This is not all that dissimilar to other staged events I've seen where Arab Palestinians approach and escalate the contact towards violence.

Most Respectfully,
R

Your ad hominen attacks mean nothing. Same as your walls of copy/paste text.
Lying about what we can all see in a video is idiotic. Not an attack, but fact.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

While the layman might use this terminology "colonial" in this fashion; itt is not really correct.

RE: Palestine Today

OK we are at page 50 and I see that the Barrage of anti-Israeli propaganda has not diminished. And as usual, this staged event surrounding that poor sweet little old Ahed al-Tamimi.

Truncated Media Snip

(COMMENT)

For the last half-century, despite the intent of the A/RES/2/110 (condemns all forms of propaganda, designed or likely to provoke or encourage a threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression) ⇒ component of today’s incitement to arouse the Arab Palestinian public. This type of extremist video's let loose the emotionally charged ⇒ anti-Israel and anti-Semitic hatred ⇒ in the form of pervasive presentations in all levels of Arab Palestinian society has inevitably led to violence and terror.

Such video's only serves to aggravate political differences and encourage confrontation.

Most Respectfully,
R

Israel's settler colonial project is the confrontation.

(COMMENT)

The settlements in Area "C" are inside the defined authority of the Oslo Accords. The Arab Palestinians (PLO as the Sole Representative of the Palestinians) made the agreement [(a) 'treaty' means an international agreement concluded between States in written form and governed by international law, whether embodied in a single instrument or in two or more related instruments and whatever its particular designation;] under the A/48/486 S/2656 • Declaration of Principles Interim Self-Government Arrangements • OSLO I • 11 October 1993 and as well as A/51/889-S/1997/357 • Israeli-Palestinian Interim Agreement on the West Bank and the Gaza Strip • OSLO II Accord • 28 September 1995; as signed by Mahmoud Abbas.

Any difference relating to the application of this Agreement shall be referred to the appropriate coordination and cooperation mechanism established under this Agreement. The provisions of Article XV of the DOP shall apply to any such difference which is not settled through the appropriate coordination and cooperation mechanism, namely:

ARTICLE XXI (OSLO II)
Settlement of Differences and Disputes

1. Disputes arising out of the application or interpretation of this Agreement or any related agreements pertaining to the interim shall be settled through the Liaison Committee.

2. Disputes which cannot be settled by negotiations may be settled by a mechanism of conciliation to be agreed between the Parties.

3. The Parties may agree to submit to arbitration disputes relating to the interim period, which cannot be settled through conciliation. To this end, upon the agreement of both Parties, the Parties will establish an Arbitration Committee.​

The Arab Palestinians have absolutely no room to perpetuate this deliberate fraud in the twisting of the truth. The fact is the Arab Palestinians gave "tacit approval" when they implied by by a failure to clearly express disapproval with the settlements through the Disputed Resolution Process; supra. "Considering it equally essential that all States shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in accordance with the Charter;" as stated in the A/RES/25/2625 - Declaration on Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States (1970). The issue of "settlements" have been --- and --- still are subject to Article V(3) of the Oslo I Declaration of Principles:

ARTICLE V(3) • TRANSITIONAL PERIOD AND PERMANENT STATUS NEGOTIATIONS
It is understood that these negotiations shall cover remaining issues, including: Jerusalem, refugees, settlements, security arrangements, borders, relations and cooperation with other neighbors, and other
issues of common interest.
​

It is exceptionally clear that the Arab Palestinians "Intentionally" chose:

Article 9 • Palestine National Charter of 1968:
Armed struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine.​

Most Respectfully,
R

Treaties and agreements must conform to international law. They cannot make legal what is illegal.

Stealing land, destroying property, and attacking civilians are illegal with or without agreements.

 

[Hollie]

Justice is such a misnomer in Israel.

You have issues with a reality based worldview. In the relevant, first world, assault and battery is a crime. While you applaud the use of teenage girls to the wage gee-had you won't, it's more than just a little creepy that you and others will gladly flaunt your cowardice and create the conditions where children grow up in an environment of hate and criminal behavior. It's child abuse - pure and unadulterated.

Really pretty loathsome.

Look at the video. The Israeli goontard slapped her first. Of course that part will be missed by Israel's kangaroo court.

Not true. Look at the video.

Look @0:23

The brave soldier hit her first. It's funny watching people lie about what is obvious in a video.

Your claim is a fraud. Fortunately, the video directly contradicts your fraudulent claim.

 

[montelatici]

In fact, it is doubtful that any agreement reached with a party under belligerent military occupation could be enforced under international law, as the occupier has the opportunity to coerce the party under belligerent military occupation in the negotiations.

 

[Hollie]

In fact, it is doubtful that any agreement reached with a party under belligerent military occupation could be enforced under international law, as the occupier has the opportunity to coerce the party under belligerent military occupation in the negotiations.

In fact, good faith negotiations with hostile, competing islamic terrorist franchises are meaningless. There is no responsible government that represents the Arabs-Moslems masquerading as "Pal'istanians".

 

[P F Tinmore]

Roadmap to Apartheid

 

[Hollie]

Roadmap to Islamic fascism / apartheid.

Gaza Strip Religion Facts & Stats

Gaza:
Religions Muslim (predominantly Sunni) 99.3%, Christian 0.7%

 

[Hollie]

Roadmap to apartheid.

 

[RoccoR]

Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is another false presentation of the facts.

Israel's settler colonial project is the confrontation.

(COMMENT)

Later in 1923, a third attempt was made to establish an institution through which the Arab population of Palestine could be brought into cooperation with the government. The mandatory Power now proposed “the establishment of an Arab Agency in Palestine which will occupy a position exactly analogous to that accorded to the Jewish Agency”. The Arab Agency would have the right to be consulted on all matters relating to immigration, on which it was recognised that “the views of the Arab community were entitled to special consideration”. The Arab leaders declined that this offer on the ground that it would not satisfy the aspirations of the Arab people. They added that, never having recognised the status of the Jewish Agency, they had no desire for the establishment of an Arab Agency on the same basis.

• 
  “The British Government desired to establish a self-government in Palestine, but to proceed in this direction by stages…. It had been announced that the nominated Advisory Council was to be the first stage. The second stage would have been a Legislative Council without an Arab majority. If this worked satisfactorily, the third stage, after a lapse of perhaps same years, would have been a constitution on more democratic lines.”

In practice it proved impossible even to initiate this policy of gradual constitutional development. From 1922 until the present day, the High Commissioner has governed Palestine with the aid of Councils consisting exclusively of British officials.
SOURCE: • A/AC.14/8 2 October 1947 •

(COMMENT)

"Fear" in the hearts of the Hostile Arab Palestinians or just plain "Greed."

It was obvious that the Arab Palestinians DID NOT want to engage in the governing processes; especially on matters of immigration. Once again, the method of choice was "armed struggle and continuing conflict."

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is another false presentation of the facts.

Israel's settler colonial project is the confrontation.

(COMMENT)

Later in 1923, a third attempt was made to establish an institution through which the Arab population of Palestine could be brought into cooperation with the government. The mandatory Power now proposed “the establishment of an Arab Agency in Palestine which will occupy a position exactly analogous to that accorded to the Jewish Agency”. The Arab Agency would have the right to be consulted on all matters relating to immigration, on which it was recognised that “the views of the Arab community were entitled to special consideration”. The Arab leaders declined that this offer on the ground that it would not satisfy the aspirations of the Arab people. They added that, never having recognised the status of the Jewish Agency, they had no desire for the establishment of an Arab Agency on the same basis.

• 
  “The British Government desired to establish a self-government in Palestine, but to proceed in this direction by stages…. It had been announced that the nominated Advisory Council was to be the first stage. The second stage would have been a Legislative Council without an Arab majority. If this worked satisfactorily, the third stage, after a lapse of perhaps same years, would have been a constitution on more democratic lines.”

In practice it proved impossible even to initiate this policy of gradual constitutional development. From 1922 until the present day, the High Commissioner has governed Palestine with the aid of Councils consisting exclusively of British officials.
SOURCE: • A/AC.14/8 2 October 1947 •

(COMMENT)

"Fear" in the hearts of the Hostile Arab Palestinians or just plain "Greed."

It was obvious that the Arab Palestinians DID NOT want to engage in the governing processes; especially on matters of immigration. Once again, the method of choice was "armed struggle and continuing conflict."

Most Respectfully,
R

It was obvious that the Arab Palestinians DID NOT want to engage in the governing processes;

The British proposal required the Palestinians to sign on to the settler colonial project. Of course they rejected it.

 

[RoccoR]

Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, that shows that Ahed Tamimi is the assailant.

Look @0:23

(COMMENT)

As in most countries in the Middle East and Europe, you hit a LEO/Military Security Personnel, you either go to booking, or the ER...

​

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Yes, that shows that Ahed Tamimi is the assailant.

Look @0:23

(COMMENT)

As in most countries in the Middle East and Europe, you hit a LEO/Military Security Personnel, you either go to booking, or the ER...

View attachment 169631
​

Most Respectfully,
R

You call those criminals LEO?

 

[RoccoR]

Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al

Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is another false presentation of the facts.

Israel's settler colonial project is the confrontation.

(COMMENT)

Later in 1923, a third attempt was made to establish an institution through which the Arab population of Palestine could be brought into cooperation with the government. The mandatory Power now proposed “the establishment of an Arab Agency in Palestine which will occupy a position exactly analogous to that accorded to the Jewish Agency”. The Arab Agency would have the right to be consulted on all matters relating to immigration, on which it was recognised that “the views of the Arab community were entitled to special consideration”. The Arab leaders declined that this offer on the ground that it would not satisfy the aspirations of the Arab people. They added that, never having recognised the status of the Jewish Agency, they had no desire for the establishment of an Arab Agency on the same basis.

• 
  “The British Government desired to establish a self-government in Palestine, but to proceed in this direction by stages…. It had been announced that the nominated Advisory Council was to be the first stage. The second stage would have been a Legislative Council without an Arab majority. If this worked satisfactorily, the third stage, after a lapse of perhaps same years, would have been a constitution on more democratic lines.”

In practice it proved impossible even to initiate this policy of gradual constitutional development. From 1922 until the present day, the High Commissioner has governed Palestine with the aid of Councils consisting exclusively of British officials.
SOURCE: • A/AC.14/8 2 October 1947 •

(COMMENT)

"Fear" in the hearts of the Hostile Arab Palestinians or just plain "Greed."

It was obvious that the Arab Palestinians DID NOT want to engage in the governing processes; especially on matters of immigration. Once again, the method of choice was "armed struggle and continuing conflict."

Most Respectfully,
R

It was obvious that the Arab Palestinians DID NOT want to engage in the governing processes;

The British proposal required the Palestinians to sign on to the settler colonial project. Of course they rejected it.

(COMMENT)

You make these allegations, with nothing supporting them, submit something that is totally misinterpreted.

I have not seen anyone ask the Arab Palestinians to forfeit any rights (civil or religious) from the time of the transition Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (1918) transference to Civil and Administrative Control by the Mandatory (1920).

The point here was that the Hostile Arab Palestinians would rather fight than engage in a peace dispute resolution process.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al

Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is another false presentation of the facts.

Israel's settler colonial project is the confrontation.

(COMMENT)

Later in 1923, a third attempt was made to establish an institution through which the Arab population of Palestine could be brought into cooperation with the government. The mandatory Power now proposed “the establishment of an Arab Agency in Palestine which will occupy a position exactly analogous to that accorded to the Jewish Agency”. The Arab Agency would have the right to be consulted on all matters relating to immigration, on which it was recognised that “the views of the Arab community were entitled to special consideration”. The Arab leaders declined that this offer on the ground that it would not satisfy the aspirations of the Arab people. They added that, never having recognised the status of the Jewish Agency, they had no desire for the establishment of an Arab Agency on the same basis.

• 
  “The British Government desired to establish a self-government in Palestine, but to proceed in this direction by stages…. It had been announced that the nominated Advisory Council was to be the first stage. The second stage would have been a Legislative Council without an Arab majority. If this worked satisfactorily, the third stage, after a lapse of perhaps same years, would have been a constitution on more democratic lines.”

In practice it proved impossible even to initiate this policy of gradual constitutional development. From 1922 until the present day, the High Commissioner has governed Palestine with the aid of Councils consisting exclusively of British officials.
SOURCE: • A/AC.14/8 2 October 1947 •

(COMMENT)

"Fear" in the hearts of the Hostile Arab Palestinians or just plain "Greed."

It was obvious that the Arab Palestinians DID NOT want to engage in the governing processes; especially on matters of immigration. Once again, the method of choice was "armed struggle and continuing conflict."

Most Respectfully,
R

It was obvious that the Arab Palestinians DID NOT want to engage in the governing processes;

The British proposal required the Palestinians to sign on to the settler colonial project. Of course they rejected it.

(COMMENT)

You make these allegations, with nothing supporting them, submit something that is totally misinterpreted.

I have not seen anyone ask the Arab Palestinians to forfeit any rights (civil or religious) from the time of the transition Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (1918) transference to Civil and Administrative Control by the Mandatory (1920).

The point here was that the Hostile Arab Palestinians would rather fight than engage in a peace dispute resolution process.

Most Respectfully,
R

You need to get off that Israeli propaganda crap.

 

[Lastamender]

Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al

Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is another false presentation of the facts.

Israel's settler colonial project is the confrontation.

(COMMENT)

Later in 1923, a third attempt was made to establish an institution through which the Arab population of Palestine could be brought into cooperation with the government. The mandatory Power now proposed “the establishment of an Arab Agency in Palestine which will occupy a position exactly analogous to that accorded to the Jewish Agency”. The Arab Agency would have the right to be consulted on all matters relating to immigration, on which it was recognised that “the views of the Arab community were entitled to special consideration”. The Arab leaders declined that this offer on the ground that it would not satisfy the aspirations of the Arab people. They added that, never having recognised the status of the Jewish Agency, they had no desire for the establishment of an Arab Agency on the same basis.

• 
  “The British Government desired to establish a self-government in Palestine, but to proceed in this direction by stages…. It had been announced that the nominated Advisory Council was to be the first stage. The second stage would have been a Legislative Council without an Arab majority. If this worked satisfactorily, the third stage, after a lapse of perhaps same years, would have been a constitution on more democratic lines.”

In practice it proved impossible even to initiate this policy of gradual constitutional development. From 1922 until the present day, the High Commissioner has governed Palestine with the aid of Councils consisting exclusively of British officials.
SOURCE: • A/AC.14/8 2 October 1947 •

(COMMENT)

"Fear" in the hearts of the Hostile Arab Palestinians or just plain "Greed."

It was obvious that the Arab Palestinians DID NOT want to engage in the governing processes; especially on matters of immigration. Once again, the method of choice was "armed struggle and continuing conflict."

Most Respectfully,
R

It was obvious that the Arab Palestinians DID NOT want to engage in the governing processes;

The British proposal required the Palestinians to sign on to the settler colonial project. Of course they rejected it.

(COMMENT)

You make these allegations, with nothing supporting them, submit something that is totally misinterpreted.

I have not seen anyone ask the Arab Palestinians to forfeit any rights (civil or religious) from the time of the transition Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (1918) transference to Civil and Administrative Control by the Mandatory (1920).

The point here was that the Hostile Arab Palestinians would rather fight than engage in a peace dispute resolution process.

Most Respectfully,
R

You need to get off that Israeli propaganda crap.

You need to show more proof of what you say. In case you did not understand post #518.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Indeependent]

Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al

Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is another false presentation of the facts.

Israel's settler colonial project is the confrontation.

(COMMENT)

Later in 1923, a third attempt was made to establish an institution through which the Arab population of Palestine could be brought into cooperation with the government. The mandatory Power now proposed “the establishment of an Arab Agency in Palestine which will occupy a position exactly analogous to that accorded to the Jewish Agency”. The Arab Agency would have the right to be consulted on all matters relating to immigration, on which it was recognised that “the views of the Arab community were entitled to special consideration”. The Arab leaders declined that this offer on the ground that it would not satisfy the aspirations of the Arab people. They added that, never having recognised the status of the Jewish Agency, they had no desire for the establishment of an Arab Agency on the same basis.

• 
  “The British Government desired to establish a self-government in Palestine, but to proceed in this direction by stages…. It had been announced that the nominated Advisory Council was to be the first stage. The second stage would have been a Legislative Council without an Arab majority. If this worked satisfactorily, the third stage, after a lapse of perhaps same years, would have been a constitution on more democratic lines.”

In practice it proved impossible even to initiate this policy of gradual constitutional development. From 1922 until the present day, the High Commissioner has governed Palestine with the aid of Councils consisting exclusively of British officials.
SOURCE: • A/AC.14/8 2 October 1947 •

(COMMENT)

"Fear" in the hearts of the Hostile Arab Palestinians or just plain "Greed."

It was obvious that the Arab Palestinians DID NOT want to engage in the governing processes; especially on matters of immigration. Once again, the method of choice was "armed struggle and continuing conflict."

Most Respectfully,
R

It was obvious that the Arab Palestinians DID NOT want to engage in the governing processes;

The British proposal required the Palestinians to sign on to the settler colonial project. Of course they rejected it.

(COMMENT)

You make these allegations, with nothing supporting them, submit something that is totally misinterpreted.

I have not seen anyone ask the Arab Palestinians to forfeit any rights (civil or religious) from the time of the transition Occupied Enemy Territory Administration (1918) transference to Civil and Administrative Control by the Mandatory (1920).

The point here was that the Hostile Arab Palestinians would rather fight than engage in a peace dispute resolution process.

Most Respectfully,
R

You need to get off that Israeli propaganda crap.

You need to show more proof of what you say. In case you did not understand post #518.

P F Retard is a shill.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Heroic Palestinian 16-year-old Ahed Tamim Is Latest Child Political Prisoner in Israel

 

[ForeverYoung436]

Heroic Palestinian 16-year-old Ahed Tamim Is Latest Child Political Prisoner in Israel

She is a hot-tempered brat, just looking for trouble, as well as a perfect Pallywood actress. The soldiers who restrain themselves, when they are around her, are nothing short of remarkable. I couldn't do that. She does, however, serve a purpose. Until she came along with her blond locks, Jose and monte would post pictures of blond Israelis as proof that Israelis are not Semitic or native to the region. They can't post those pictures anymore. She is proof that Palestinians are not native to the region. In fact, she is probably descended from Bosnian Muslims.

 

[RoccoR]

Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al

This is NOT, by any definition, a political prisoner.

Heroic Palestinian 16-year-old Ahed Tamim Is Latest Child Political Prisoner in Israel

(COMMENT)

This is a membership of a ruthless ‘sister street-gang,’who is being booked for assault. She is neither heroic or politically retained for her beliefs. She is just a common ordinary street urchin trying to create trouble; getting her 15 minutes of fame.

These kinds of quasi-street gangs (all female) have been around since the late 1960's. BUT, it is not unique to either the West Bank or the Gaza Strip. They can be very benign at times; running together for protection against those that would do them harm. Others are swarms of hoodlums that strike like piranha; that will engulf the prey.

There are times that the gaggle will send one or two members out in the open - appearing vulnerable and alone to cause trouble, and when it starts, they swarm in from all directions. This is how female street gangs often mark their turf.

Most Respectfully,
R