- Sep 29, 2005
- Reaction score
- Surfing the Oceans of Liquidity
Yeah, the justices said their ruling in Bush v Gore couldn't be used as precedent.Er, maybe not.US Supreme Court...
View attachment 422755
The Michigan Supreme Court ruling transgresses upon the following Federal Rights
"The petition presents the following questions: whether the Florida Supreme Court established new standards for resolving Presidential election contests, thereby violating Art. II, § 1, cl. 2, of the United States Constitution and failing to comply with 3 U. S. C. § 5, and whether the use of standardless manual recounts violates the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses. With respect to the equal protection question, we find a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
Bush v. Gore, 531 U.S. 98 (2000)
SCOTUS will reverse Michigan's politicians in black robes.
Hey Lionel. I'm not a lawyer. I guess that means we have something in common rofl