Over 4.5 Billion to die by 2012

[SSDD]

Over 4.5 Billion people could die from Global Warming-related causes by 2012

The Canadian National Newspaper: Over 4.5 Billion people could die from Global Warming-related causes by 2012

Runaway Global Warming promises to literally burn-up agricultural areas into dust worldwide by 2012, causing global famine, anarchy, diseases, and war on a global scale as military powers including the U.S., Russia, and China, fight for control of the Earth's remaining resources.

Over 4.5 billion people could die from Global Warming related causes by 2012, as planet Earth accelarates into a greed-driven horrific catastrophe.

Four and a half billion of us apparently didn't get the memo. Anyone who takes these people seriously is as crazy as they are.

 

[daveman]

No, no, they're right...as long as you classify every single cause of death as being related to global warming.

It's easier than thinking, I suppose.

 

[editec]

An article dated 2 August 2013 is POSTdicting a global environmental catastrophe the PREVIOUS YEAR?

I am somewhat confused by this

 

[martybegan]

An article dated 2 August 2013 is POSTdicting a global environmental catastrophe the PREVIOUS YEAR?

I am somewhat confused by this

If you look at the link it appears the article is from 2007. it isnt in the body of the article, but the archive location of the hypertext.

The web page probably just puts todays date at the top.

 

[mamooth]

So who is John Stokes, and why should I care he wrote a dumb article?

On the stupidity scale, I'd put SSDD as similar in stupidity to John Stokes, given the stupidity of this particular idiot cherry pick.

This is why no one takes the crazy denialists seriously, because they constantly pull retarded shit like this. People with functional logic circuits simply don't get sucked into the denialist cult.

 

[boedicca]

You all are missing the point of the story. They must have invented a Time Machine so they could go back to 2012 witness all of the people die horrible deaths from AGW.

 

[Old Rocks]

Over 4.5 Billion people could die from Global Warming-related causes by 2012

The Canadian National Newspaper: Over 4.5 Billion people could die from Global Warming-related causes by 2012

Runaway Global Warming promises to literally burn-up agricultural areas into dust worldwide by 2012, causing global famine, anarchy, diseases, and war on a global scale as military powers including the U.S., Russia, and China, fight for control of the Earth's remaining resources.

Over 4.5 billion people could die from Global Warming related causes by 2012, as planet Earth accelarates into a greed-driven horrific catastrophe.

Four and a half billion of us apparently didn't get the memo. Anyone who takes these people seriously is as crazy as they are.

And what scientific journal was this published in? Same kind of shit as the '70's articles about an immanent ice age. Done by journalists who have no idea of science above the third grade level. Kind of like you.

 

[SSDD]

So who is John Stokes, and why should I care he wrote a dumb article?

On the stupidity scale, I'd put SSDD as similar in stupidity to John Stokes, given the stupidity of this particular idiot cherry pick.

This is why no one takes the crazy denialists seriously, because they constantly pull retarded shit like this. People with functional logic circuits simply don't get sucked into the denialist cult.

Your inability to read is showing again. The author who provided the background research for that article is highly respected among you warmists. In fact, he arguably wrote the first artcile on global warming back in the 1980's. I am sure that if presented with a number of his articles, you would agree with most and in fact, probably agreed with this one when written back in 2007. You guys are still angsting over methane in the arctic as the result of exactly this sort of scaremongering.

 

[Saigon]

I notice that no one is questioning that the methane loop exists, and is a massive threat to life on this planet.

Much better to argue about what some idiot blogger wrote than actually deal with the science, I guess.

 

[SSDD]

And what scientific journal was this published in? Same kind of shit as the '70's articles about an immanent ice age. Done by journalists who have no idea of science above the third grade level. Kind of like you.

We have already examined what you call the shit of the 70's and you got your ass handed to you since it turned out that science was solidly behind the ice age scare of the 70's. For example:

The "science" behind this claim came from NCAR:

http://denisdutton.com/newsweek_coolingworld.pdf

Then there was this from the National Academy of Sciences

http://www.sciencenews.org/view/download/id/37739/name/CHILLING_POSSIBILITIES

This article correctly notes that NCAR, CRU, NAS, NASA and the CIA were onboard with the ice age scare.

The Windsor Star - Google News Archive Search

And one shouldn't forget the CIA report on the problems the coming ice age was going to cause in the realm of national security. Where do you think they got their information if not from climatologists?

http://www.climatemonitor.it/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/1974.pdf

This newspaper article clearly identifies NASA as the source of it's information

U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming

This in Time referencening information from Science Magazine...you know who publishes that mag don't you?

Science: Another Ice Age? - TIME

This one references the National Academy and NCAR:

http://www.wmconnolley.org.uk/sci/iceage/ny-times-1975-05-21.pdf

The fact is rocks that there was an ice age scare in the 70's. Maybe you aren't as old as you claim and simply weren't around or perhaps your memory has failed...or maybe you are just a denier. Maybe you don't remember that scientific articles weren't available to the average citizen back then and the papers reported on them.

The scare happened, it didn't come to pass and now deniers and revisionists are trying to pretend that it is something made up by skeptics.

 

[Saigon]

We have already examined what you call the shit of the 70's and you got your ass handed to you since it turned out that science was solidly behind the ice age scare of the 70's.

No, that's a lie.

As was pointed out to you by several posters at the time - the ice age scare was dreamt up by journalists and was based on something like 7 scientific papers. During the same period, some 40 scientific papers discussed global warming.

Have you forgotten that thread, or do you want to see the links?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"Over 4.5 billion people could die from Global Warming related causes by 2012, as planet Earth accelarates into a greed-driven horrific catastrophe.

Bibliographic reference courtesy of Brad Arnold who has an extensive resrarch background on Global Warming."

 

[CrusaderFrank]

AGW Cult is cult

 

[Saigon]

AGW Cult is cult

You really are completely illiterate, aren't you?

 

[SSDD]

I notice that no one is questioning that the methane loop exists, and is a massive threat to life on this planet.

Much better to argue about what some idiot blogger wrote than actually deal with the science, I guess.

Methane is no more magical than CO2. The oceans and the earth heat the atmosphere, not the other way around.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

AGW Cult is cult

You really are completely illiterate, aren't you?

"AGW Cult is cult. We're the only ones who can save the planet!"

 

[SSDD]

We have already examined what you call the shit of the 70's and you got your ass handed to you since it turned out that science was solidly behind the ice age scare of the 70's.

No, that's a lie.

As was pointed out to you by several posters at the time - the ice age scare was dreamt up by journalists and was based on something like 7 scientific papers. During the same period, some 40 scientific papers discussed global warming.

Have you forgotten that thread, or do you want to see the links?

Maybe you should look at the bibliography at the end of the CIA paper...the "science" upon which they were convinced that an ice age was on its way...45 citations.

That is in addition to the fact that NASA, CRU, NCAR, and the National Academy of Science being on board. The ice age scare was a fact and no amount of denial is going to change history.

 

[Saigon]

SSDD -

Yes, the ice age scare is a fact - but that doesn't mean it ever had scientific backing.

It was a scare largely dreamt up by journalists, and with very little scientific interest. If you genuinely do not remember or did not see the thread where this was discussed at length, it is worth looking into. One poster went as far as listing the scientific papers published on the topic. From memory there were seven - with 40 backing global warming during the same period.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

SSDD -

Yes, the ice age scare is a fact - but that doesn't mean it ever had scientific backing.

It was a scare largely dreamt up by journalists, and with very little scientific interest. If you genuinely do not remember or did not see the thread where this was discussed at length, it is worth looking into. One poster went as far as listing the scientific papers published on the topic. From memory there were seven - with 40 backing global warming during the same period.

AGW has no real scientific backing either. Mann's tree ring and altered data is not science

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Global Warming
Global Warming
Global Warming
Global Warming

Um, its not warming

Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change
Climate Change