Outdoor Spread of Cajuna Virus much less likely than reported by CDC (NYT)

DGS49

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2012
15,920
13,514
2,415
Pittsburgh
"When the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released new guidelines last month for mask wearing, it announced that “less than 10 percent” of Covid-19 transmission was occurring outdoors. Media organizations repeated the statistic, and it quickly became a standard description of the frequency of outdoor transmission.​
But the number is almost certainly misleading.​
It appears to be based partly on a misclassification of some Covid transmission that actually took place in enclosed spaces (as I explain below). An even bigger issue is the extreme caution of C.D.C. officials, who picked a benchmark — 10 percent — so high that nobody could reasonably dispute it.​
That benchmark “seems to be a huge exaggeration,” as Dr. Muge Cevik, a virologist at the University of St. Andrews, said. In truth, the share of transmission that has occurred outdoors seems to be below 1 percent and may be below 0.1 percent, multiple epidemiologists told me. The rare outdoor transmission that has happened almost all seems to have involved crowded places or close conversation.​
Saying that less than 10 percent of Covid transmission occurs outdoors is akin to saying that sharks attack fewer than 20,000 swimmers a year"

SO WHY ARE OUTDOOR EVENTS STILL DEMANDING SOCIAL DISTANCING AND LIMITING PARTICIPATION?

IT IS AS STUPID AS THE PRESIDENT WEARING A MASK WHEN IS ALONE OUTDOORS, OR WITH A GROUP OF FULLY-VACCINATED PEOPLE.

 
This isnt about the "science."
Another term the left destroyed
 

Forum List

Back
Top