i like to think that she will crash and burn the second she opens her mouth in a serious debate or has to answer a serious question, assuming she takes the drastic pay cut and runs, but then again...people are pretty ******* stupid. angle only lost by the slightest of margins. palin's rallies are like those of joseph goebells in the sportspalast of berlin circa 1943, when everyone knew the war would lead to the doom of germany and only a handpicked audience was allowed to attend.
At this point in time I can't see either a Palin POTUS or even VicePOTUS candidacy in 2012 but I do see a Palin who is educating herself to, at least, domestic issues and whose influence is definitley ascending. Given her inexperience she didn't look all that bad in the VP debate with Biden, although that performance may have been due more to a weak Biden performance than a stellar Palin one. Time will tell but she is definitely having an influence in the GOP where the debate now centers on
how far to the right the GOP can move as opposed to how much it should 'compromise' with the left. This is not a bad thing for the country as a whole. Your point about Hitler rallies, I think, is well taken. In this vein you must admit Obama's rallys, even as president, are similar RE the 'friendliness' of the crowds, although Palin's crowds seem a little more energetic.
She won't win Maine or Wisconsin.
West Virginia and Texas she will win no problem. But a drunk schizophrenic monkey could win those states over a democrat as long as an (R) was next to their name.
She has as much of a chance of winning Minnesota as that monkey does.
There will never be a president Palin. She's to polarizing of a figure. Good, bad, or indifferent it won't happen.
She
is a polarizing figure but, as has been pointed out, so, now, is Barry. But tback to the GOP candidate. Personally, I feel that McCain made a good choice in Palin as his running mate and that she injected a lot of energy into his campaign. In the process she also allowed the GOP to, somewhat, differentiate themselves from not the Dems so much as from G.W. Bush and his administration. In the end it didn't matter because Barry was successful in portraying McCain as Bush 2.0 and Barry had the messiah thing going on.
Things have changed in that Obama has now been recognized as promoting European Socialism while Britain, France, and Germany now seem to be following fiscal advice that could have very well come from Tea Party advocates like Palin. Further, despite the Dems denial-fest, we have seen a 2010 electorate that agrees with the austerity measures meted out by those countries...and more. Also, both Tea Partiers and Independents are reading the U.S. Constitution, Federalist papers, and, even Ayn Rand. With this self education they have decided that perhaps we should dial back the government in both spending and its influence on individual liberties. So while we may not see a Palin bid in 2012 her influence cannot be ignored. I would go so far to say that the GOP's problem is more those like McConnell and Graham than it is Palin.
Somebody mentioned Romney here (not either one of you). Romney is done. If he gets the GOP nod for president it will be an excellent indication that the GOP has not learned its lesson RE its profligate spending and growing government. How is the owner of Romneycare in MA to differentiate himself from an Obamacare candidate? Rubio looks and sounds good but personally I would prefer a governor like Christie. Governors don't have to vote on all the legislation coming down the pike and this removes some ammunition for the enemy plus they have executive experience. Christie has an added benefit of having the ability to cut through leftist argument with conservative principles and stubborn facts. He would absolutely devastate Obama in a fairly run debate...hands down. Howerver he says he wants to finish the job in NJ, we will see. Right now I like Haley Barbour Gov. of LA and he just stepped down in his leadership position in the RGA, but we'll see I guess.
JM