Our Eroding Prison System: Epstein's Groomer Placed in Solitary Confinement

Lord Long Rod

Diamond Member
Jan 17, 2023
7,706
8,122
2,138
First off, I admittedly posted this story because I wanted to say "Jizzlaine Maxwell". Secondly, it is amazing how privileged people feel. First off, the sick whore should not have been allowed to even do an interview while in prison. Frankly, what did they think would happen. However, while it may be wrong to punish her for something they allowed her to do, the real problem is allowing her ANY degree of normalcy in prison. It is PRISON. It is not supposed to be a resort where inmates are entitled to spa treatments and to run their lives as normal. Jizzlaine is a sick, despicable person. She needs to be made aware of the fact that she is so fucked up that she needs to be removed from proper society. But for her attachment to wealth, Jizzlaine would be literally whoring herself out to fat, middle aged men in order to produce an income. Her mouth would have higher concentrations of jizz and meth than oxygen. That is the life she chose. She somehow stumbled into the privileged life of Jeffrey Epstein's preternatural sexuality and extortion. All of Jizzlaine's privileges were revoked once she was convicted of her heinous crimes. Solitary confinement is a problem for her? Does SC subject people to anxiety and otherwise cause harm to individuals'' psyche? The answer to these questions is: Who fucking cares?!? We, as a society, WANT people to suffer while they are in prison. Prison is not just some place to house the undesirables among us. There NEEDS to be an affirmative infliction of discomfort, physical and psychological, in order for prison to be a deterrent to crime and to satisfy the need of those victimized (both the individual victims and society in general) for retribution. I am talking about discomfort above and beyond not being able to get a foot massage.

Yes, prisoners have certain rights. But these rights obviously decrease substantially when imprisoned. While I am not necessarily saying that prisoners should be subjected to brutal torture, we can certainly do more to make their lives a hell on earth. And that is what we should be doing. Oh, and BTW, if you are one of those limp-wristed squishes who attempt to pimp the utterly flaccid "argument" that solitary confinement is torture, then you are a lunatic who does not need to even be discussing this issue. Go fuck a unicorn, sweetheart.

People make choices. If you choose to do something that may land in you prison, then you have already accepted the consequences. I think that anything you do to a prisoner convicted of a serious crime that is not likely to lead to death (except for death row inmates) should be ok if it results in an unpleasant experience to said prisoner. This includes waterboarding. Obviously, it will require a step regime. Forcible sodomy may be ok for some scumfuck convicted of rape, but may be too much for some guy in the country lockup for a DUI. But these are details that can be hashed out. The overall principle is clear and, frankly, not subject to debate: If prison is to have a deterrent effect, then people are going to have to not want to go there.

Plenty of scumbags are willing to risk prison to commit their chosen crime(s). But, would they make a similar choice knowing that they would be facing a nearly non-stop regiment of waterboarding and a course called "Crafting with Dog Shit" in which they are forced to make vases and other shit out of fresh, wet dog shit? Over and over.... waterboarding, dog shit, waterboarding, dog shit, waterboarding, dogshit... The exact punishments are open to suggestion. Again, the overarching point is that their experience must be unpleasant. Don't get lost in details.

 
First off, I admittedly posted this story because I wanted to say "Jizzlaine Maxwell". Secondly, it is amazing how privileged people feel. First off, the sick whore should not have been allowed to even do an interview while in prison. Frankly, what did they think would happen. However, while it may be wrong to punish her for something they allowed her to do, the real problem is allowing her ANY degree of normalcy in prison. It is PRISON. It is not supposed to be a resort where inmates are entitled to spa treatments and to run their lives as normal. Jizzlaine is a sick, despicable person. She needs to be made aware of the fact that she is so fucked up that she needs to be removed from proper society. But for her attachment to wealth, Jizzlaine would be literally whoring herself out to fat, middle aged men in order to produce an income. Her mouth would have higher concentrations of jizz and meth than oxygen. That is the life she chose. She somehow stumbled into the privileged life of Jeffrey Epstein's preternatural sexuality and extortion. All of Jizzlaine's privileges were revoked once she was convicted of her heinous crimes. Solitary confinement is a problem for her? Does SC subject people to anxiety and otherwise cause harm to individuals'' psyche? The answer to these questions is: Who fucking cares?!? We, as a society, WANT people to suffer while they are in prison. Prison is not just some place to house the undesirables among us. There NEEDS to be an affirmative infliction of discomfort, physical and psychological, in order for prison to be a deterrent to crime and to satisfy the need of those victimized (both the individual victims and society in general) for retribution. I am talking about discomfort above and beyond not being able to get a foot massage.

Yes, prisoners have certain rights. But these rights obviously decrease substantially when imprisoned. While I am not necessarily saying that prisoners should be subjected to brutal torture, we can certainly do more to make their lives a hell on earth. And that is what we should be doing. Oh, and BTW, if you are one of those limp-wristed squishes who attempt to pimp the utterly flaccid "argument" that solitary confinement is torture, then you are a lunatic who does not need to even be discussing this issue. Go fuck a unicorn, sweetheart.

People make choices. If you choose to do something that may land in you prison, then you have already accepted the consequences. I think that anything you do to a prisoner convicted of a serious crime that is not likely to lead to death (except for death row inmates) should be ok if it results in an unpleasant experience to said prisoner. This includes waterboarding. Obviously, it will require a step regime. Forcible sodomy may be ok for some scumfuck convicted of rape, but may be too much for some guy in the country lockup for a DUI. But these are details that can be hashed out. The overall principle is clear and, frankly, not subject to debate: If prison is to have a deterrent effect, then people are going to have to not want to go there.

Plenty of scumbags are willing to risk prison to commit their chosen crime(s). But, would they make a similar choice knowing that they would be facing a nearly non-stop regiment of waterboarding and a course called "Crafting with Dog Shit" in which they are forced to make vases and other shit out of fresh, wet dog shit? Over and over.... waterboarding, dog shit, waterboarding, dog shit, waterboarding, dogshit... The exact punishments are open to suggestion. Again, the overarching point is that their experience must be unpleasant. Don't get lost in details.

.

Solitary confinement, you say?

Certainly the de rigueur venue for any stylish "prison suicide", oui?

.
 
First off, I admittedly posted this story because I wanted to say "Jizzlaine Maxwell". Secondly, it is amazing how privileged people feel. First off, the sick whore should not have been allowed to even do an interview while in prison. Frankly, what did they think would happen. However, while it may be wrong to punish her for something they allowed her to do, the real problem is allowing her ANY degree of normalcy in prison. It is PRISON. It is not supposed to be a resort where inmates are entitled to spa treatments and to run their lives as normal. Jizzlaine is a sick, despicable person. She needs to be made aware of the fact that she is so fucked up that she needs to be removed from proper society. But for her attachment to wealth, Jizzlaine would be literally whoring herself out to fat, middle aged men in order to produce an income. Her mouth would have higher concentrations of jizz and meth than oxygen. That is the life she chose. She somehow stumbled into the privileged life of Jeffrey Epstein's preternatural sexuality and extortion. All of Jizzlaine's privileges were revoked once she was convicted of her heinous crimes. Solitary confinement is a problem for her? Does SC subject people to anxiety and otherwise cause harm to individuals'' psyche? The answer to these questions is: Who fucking cares?!? We, as a society, WANT people to suffer while they are in prison. Prison is not just some place to house the undesirables among us. There NEEDS to be an affirmative infliction of discomfort, physical and psychological, in order for prison to be a deterrent to crime and to satisfy the need of those victimized (both the individual victims and society in general) for retribution. I am talking about discomfort above and beyond not being able to get a foot massage.

Yes, prisoners have certain rights. But these rights obviously decrease substantially when imprisoned. While I am not necessarily saying that prisoners should be subjected to brutal torture, we can certainly do more to make their lives a hell on earth. And that is what we should be doing. Oh, and BTW, if you are one of those limp-wristed squishes who attempt to pimp the utterly flaccid "argument" that solitary confinement is torture, then you are a lunatic who does not need to even be discussing this issue. Go fuck a unicorn, sweetheart.

People make choices. If you choose to do something that may land in you prison, then you have already accepted the consequences. I think that anything you do to a prisoner convicted of a serious crime that is not likely to lead to death (except for death row inmates) should be ok if it results in an unpleasant experience to said prisoner. This includes waterboarding. Obviously, it will require a step regime. Forcible sodomy may be ok for some scumfuck convicted of rape, but may be too much for some guy in the country lockup for a DUI. But these are details that can be hashed out. The overall principle is clear and, frankly, not subject to debate: If prison is to have a deterrent effect, then people are going to have to not want to go there.

Plenty of scumbags are willing to risk prison to commit their chosen crime(s). But, would they make a similar choice knowing that they would be facing a nearly non-stop regiment of waterboarding and a course called "Crafting with Dog Shit" in which they are forced to make vases and other shit out of fresh, wet dog shit? Over and over.... waterboarding, dog shit, waterboarding, dog shit, waterboarding, dogshit... The exact punishments are open to suggestion. Again, the overarching point is that their experience must be unpleasant. Don't get lost in details.

Aren't you putting a little too much emphasis on matters concerning sexuality?

How about mass murder by gun being of at least equal priority?

Does this have something to do with the influence of the Catholic church on your personal priorities?
 
First off, I admittedly posted this story because I wanted to say "Jizzlaine Maxwell". Secondly, it is amazing how privileged people feel. First off, the sick whore should not have been allowed to even do an interview while in prison. Frankly, what did they think would happen. However, while it may be wrong to punish her for something they allowed her to do, the real problem is allowing her ANY degree of normalcy in prison. It is PRISON. It is not supposed to be a resort where inmates are entitled to spa treatments and to run their lives as normal. Jizzlaine is a sick, despicable person. She needs to be made aware of the fact that she is so fucked up that she needs to be removed from proper society. But for her attachment to wealth, Jizzlaine would be literally whoring herself out to fat, middle aged men in order to produce an income. Her mouth would have higher concentrations of jizz and meth than oxygen. That is the life she chose. She somehow stumbled into the privileged life of Jeffrey Epstein's preternatural sexuality and extortion. All of Jizzlaine's privileges were revoked once she was convicted of her heinous crimes. Solitary confinement is a problem for her? Does SC subject people to anxiety and otherwise cause harm to individuals'' psyche? The answer to these questions is: Who fucking cares?!? We, as a society, WANT people to suffer while they are in prison. Prison is not just some place to house the undesirables among us. There NEEDS to be an affirmative infliction of discomfort, physical and psychological, in order for prison to be a deterrent to crime and to satisfy the need of those victimized (both the individual victims and society in general) for retribution. I am talking about discomfort above and beyond not being able to get a foot massage.

Yes, prisoners have certain rights. But these rights obviously decrease substantially when imprisoned. While I am not necessarily saying that prisoners should be subjected to brutal torture, we can certainly do more to make their lives a hell on earth. And that is what we should be doing. Oh, and BTW, if you are one of those limp-wristed squishes who attempt to pimp the utterly flaccid "argument" that solitary confinement is torture, then you are a lunatic who does not need to even be discussing this issue. Go fuck a unicorn, sweetheart.

People make choices. If you choose to do something that may land in you prison, then you have already accepted the consequences. I think that anything you do to a prisoner convicted of a serious crime that is not likely to lead to death (except for death row inmates) should be ok if it results in an unpleasant experience to said prisoner. This includes waterboarding. Obviously, it will require a step regime. Forcible sodomy may be ok for some scumfuck convicted of rape, but may be too much for some guy in the country lockup for a DUI. But these are details that can be hashed out. The overall principle is clear and, frankly, not subject to debate: If prison is to have a deterrent effect, then people are going to have to not want to go there.

Plenty of scumbags are willing to risk prison to commit their chosen crime(s). But, would they make a similar choice knowing that they would be facing a nearly non-stop regiment of waterboarding and a course called "Crafting with Dog Shit" in which they are forced to make vases and other shit out of fresh, wet dog shit? Over and over.... waterboarding, dog shit, waterboarding, dog shit, waterboarding, dogshit... The exact punishments are open to suggestion. Again, the overarching point is that their experience must be unpleasant. Don't get lost in details.


~~~~~~
Maxwell's lax treatment in prison is a payoff for keeping her mouth shut. There are a multitude of Democrat and RINO's that took trips to Lolita Island and were videoed in compromising positions with young girls.
That is why we've never seen that black book.
Solitary confinement in Club Fed is like study hall.
 
First off, I admittedly posted this story because I wanted to say "Jizzlaine Maxwell". Secondly, it is amazing how privileged people feel. First off, the sick whore should not have been allowed to even do an interview while in prison. Frankly, what did they think would happen. However, while it may be wrong to punish her for something they allowed her to do, the real problem is allowing her ANY degree of normalcy in prison. It is PRISON. It is not supposed to be a resort where inmates are entitled to spa treatments and to run their lives as normal. Jizzlaine is a sick, despicable person. She needs to be made aware of the fact that she is so fucked up that she needs to be removed from proper society. But for her attachment to wealth, Jizzlaine would be literally whoring herself out to fat, middle aged men in order to produce an income. Her mouth would have higher concentrations of jizz and meth than oxygen. That is the life she chose. She somehow stumbled into the privileged life of Jeffrey Epstein's preternatural sexuality and extortion. All of Jizzlaine's privileges were revoked once she was convicted of her heinous crimes. Solitary confinement is a problem for her? Does SC subject people to anxiety and otherwise cause harm to individuals'' psyche? The answer to these questions is: Who fucking cares?!? We, as a society, WANT people to suffer while they are in prison. Prison is not just some place to house the undesirables among us. There NEEDS to be an affirmative infliction of discomfort, physical and psychological, in order for prison to be a deterrent to crime and to satisfy the need of those victimized (both the individual victims and society in general) for retribution. I am talking about discomfort above and beyond not being able to get a foot massage.

Yes, prisoners have certain rights. But these rights obviously decrease substantially when imprisoned. While I am not necessarily saying that prisoners should be subjected to brutal torture, we can certainly do more to make their lives a hell on earth. And that is what we should be doing. Oh, and BTW, if you are one of those limp-wristed squishes who attempt to pimp the utterly flaccid "argument" that solitary confinement is torture, then you are a lunatic who does not need to even be discussing this issue. Go fuck a unicorn, sweetheart.

People make choices. If you choose to do something that may land in you prison, then you have already accepted the consequences. I think that anything you do to a prisoner convicted of a serious crime that is not likely to lead to death (except for death row inmates) should be ok if it results in an unpleasant experience to said prisoner. This includes waterboarding. Obviously, it will require a step regime. Forcible sodomy may be ok for some scumfuck convicted of rape, but may be too much for some guy in the country lockup for a DUI. But these are details that can be hashed out. The overall principle is clear and, frankly, not subject to debate: If prison is to have a deterrent effect, then people are going to have to not want to go there.

Plenty of scumbags are willing to risk prison to commit their chosen crime(s). But, would they make a similar choice knowing that they would be facing a nearly non-stop regiment of waterboarding and a course called "Crafting with Dog Shit" in which they are forced to make vases and other shit out of fresh, wet dog shit? Over and over.... waterboarding, dog shit, waterboarding, dog shit, waterboarding, dogshit... The exact punishments are open to suggestion. Again, the overarching point is that their experience must be unpleasant. Don't get lost in details.



unless they are going to post the client list this is another waste of time discussing it,,
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #6
Aren't you putting a little too much emphasis on matters concerning sexuality?

How about mass murder by gun being of at least equal priority?

Does this have something to do with the influence of the Catholic church on your personal priorities?
I don’t think I am putting too much emphasis on sex.
 
I don’t think I am putting too much emphasis on sex.
After some of the things you said, I think you're a very fkd up sick individual. And granted my Canadian POV is widely different from American opinions.

More to the truth, I don't think you really believe in what you've said; you just wanted to make an impression with extremists of you being more extremist as any of them. And of course you are needing attention and that was the best way you could think up quickly enough for this forum's pace.

Can you double down on your rage by making the point even more extreme. You didn't mention capital punishment for many minor crimes against your sensibilities.
 
After some of the things you said, I think you're a very fkd up sick individual. And granted my Canadian POV is widely different from American opinions.

More to the truth, I don't think you really believe in what you've said; you just wanted to make an impression with extremists of you being more extremist as any of them. And of course you are needing attention and that was the best way you could think up quickly enough for this forum's pace.

Can you double down on your rage by making the point even more extreme. You didn't mention capital punishment for many minor crimes against your sensibilities.
.


FOAD troll.



.
 
It reached a level of bizarre emotional behaviour by the OP that needs to be pointed out for it's excess even for this forum.

But, would they make a similar choice knowing that they would be facing a nearly non-stop regiment of waterboarding and a course called "Crafting with Dog Shit" in which they are forced to make vases and other shit out of fresh, wet dog shit? Over and over.... waterboarding, dog shit, waterboarding, dog shit, waterboarding, dogshit...

Is this a display of hate that has ascended to a level of mental illness?

Anybody want to sign on with that?
 
It reached a level of bizarre emotional behaviour by the OP that needs to be pointed out for it's excess even for this forum.



Is this a display of hate that has ascended to a level of mental illness?

Anybody want to sign on with that?
.

So the poster has a vivid imagination.

.
 
Aren't you putting a little too much emphasis on matters concerning sexuality?

How about mass murder by gun being of at least equal priority?

Does this have something to do with the influence of the Catholic church on your personal priorities?

This is a woman who sold little girls into sexual slavery. Their lives are forever changed.

Nor would this piece of shit be whoring herself out to anyone as the 0P suggests. Maxwell was a trust fund baby. She recently filed documents with the courts indicating a net worth of $69 million and annual income of $8 million.
 
After some of the things you said, I think you're a very fkd up sick individual. And granted my Canadian POV is widely different from American opinions.

More to the truth, I don't think you really believe in what you've said; you just wanted to make an impression with extremists of you being more extremist as any of them. And of course you are needing attention and that was the best way you could think up quickly enough for this forum's pace.

Can you double down on your rage by making the point even more extreme. You didn't mention capital punishment for many minor crimes against your sensibilities.
I CLEARLY stated that such a system would need to delineate between levels of offenses for the purpose of serving appropriate forms of punishment. However, I completely get the Canadian angle. You folks north of the border are pretty humorless. The gist of what I say is sincere, even if I take some poetic liberties. Real deterrence is needed in our corrections system.
 
It reached a level of bizarre emotional behaviour by the OP that needs to be pointed out for it's excess even for this forum.



Is this a display of hate that has ascended to a level of mental illness?

Anybody want to sign on with that?
Stop crying, Nancy. There is a point in all of what I said. You have seemed to have missed the forest for its trees.
 
I CLEARLY stated that such a system would need to delineate between levels of offenses for the purpose of serving appropriate forms of punishment. However, I completely get the Canadian angle. You folks north of the border are pretty humorless. The gist of what I say is sincere, even if I take some poetic liberties. Real deterrence is needed in our corrections system.
Your apology and excuses aren't accepted. You'll need to demonstrate some alternate behaviour and sustain it for a couple of weeks at least.
 

Forum List

Back
Top