“Our diversity is our strength”....why do Dems say this without offering data to prove it?

In biology the more diverse the pool the more likely the odds of survival.

Inbreeding. Or limiting genetic lines tends to create genetic weakness. A problem recognized and demonstrated in history.

So diversity creates a stronger genetic line. Basic biology. Need links or did you attend any schooling?

By examining a problem with many different viewpoints the solution can be found. Often looking outside of the limited initial view.

Take the tanks for the Saturn Rockets. These tanks would hold the cryogenic fuels to power the rockets. One of the problems that they ran into was getting the insulation to adhere to the tank satisfactorily. The Engineers were having a lot of trouble. They ended up hiring surfers who had a lot of experience working with the foam insulation and shaping it. That was the core of their surfboards after all.

Diversity allowed the Rockets to get us to the moon. Not rejecting someone because he wore his hair too long or smoked some funny stuff. Of course there was an absentee problem when the surf was up.

But we can prove it in international business too. Tata Motors owns companies that were founded. Operated. And run into the ground by Whites. Tata is Indian. From India. Not Native American.

Jaguar and Land Rover are turning profits. Because India bought them and made them profitable again. Something Ford couldn’t do.

Kia manages to operate American Factories for profit. Something Ford and GM had to go to Mexico to do.

Then again. You could argue that Ford and GM became profitable after diversification of their manufacturing. To Mexico.

Now none of this will matter to you. You will insist white people are better.
Not necessarily true, Einstein. And this is where badger gets to do a favorite imitation: Punch and Judy. In its search for Truth, the Peanut Gallery again forgets to include Theo, a prime pathology. This particular example from the evolution of protection rackets, is a particular image standing at the pulpit addressing the diversity represented by the prisoners of the congregation: “Look at me when I’m talking to you.” From Chu Hsi, the neo-Confucian, the “diversity of particularizations” likely arose first in the East, not West.

’In the environment of our early ancestors Late Pleistocene Africa), the selective advantage went to hominids whose cognitive capacities enabled them to quickly detect relevant agents in the natural environment, and whose groups were adequately protected from the dissolution that could result from too many defectors and cheaters in the social environment....their survival was enhanced by the integration of theogonic forces.’
(Shults, Iconoclastic Theology: Gilles Deleuze and the Secretion of Atheism)

’If the moral measure of legislation is the greatest good for the greatest number, it follows that the good of the minority, even a minority of one, is immoral. That would hardly accord with the basic tenet of individualism that man is endowed with rights which the majority may not tamper with. The contradiction bothered Mill (whose essay On Liberty is high dogma in the individual’s creed) no end; his doctrine of freedom of thought and expression was hardly consistent with the majoritarianism of Bentham. In this philosophic conflict, his loyalty to his father (Bentham’s closest associate) and to Bentham won out, and in the event he was logically driven to a qualified endorsement of socialism.
(Chodorov, Fugitive Essays: What Individualism Is Not)

More lesbionic than Lesbos, gayer than gay, blm baboonage swiftly moved from the particular of the fentanyl eater, Floyd, to identify with the diversity of the crowd: the black race, in ‘black lives matter,’ which is a racist statement that reifies one race at the expense of all other American races. In this essay, Chodorov shows the difference between the selfishness of blm baboonage and the individualism that the baboons were destroying, the American individualism that they had built, represented by the infrastructure. And this selfish opportunism occurred (while [italics]) the communist virus was eating this individualism.
 
Is the reader surprised that the dems did nothing during the baboonisms of their controlled shitholes? Tongue-in-cheek is the irony while the commie virus raged:

’For the hospital system: the “new medicine without doctor or patient” that singles out potential sick and subjects at risk, which in no way attests to individuation — as they say — but substitutes for the individual or numerical body the code of a “dividual” material to be controlled.’
(Postscript on the Societies of Control)
 
Diversity to democrats does not include white males unless they constantly apologize for their past sins and the sins of their white male ancestors. Many democrats blame white males for all the evil in the world and some loot, pillage and burn cities to protest those they perceive to be white supremacists. Of course the fact that black on black crime is higher by far than white on black crime is all the fault of the evil white male and his racist police.
 
We’ve heard this over and over again...Pelosi, Sanders, the Kenyan, Kameltoe Hairyass...they’ve all parroted this...Does it feel good to say such a thing or is there data to prove it?

Keep in mind what they mean by diversity.

They mean diversity of Race ( which they also say does not exist ) Sexual orientation. Gender identity etc.

None of which is valuable. You are correct they can give no evidence that such diversity is a strength.

If it is a strength why are movies with such intentional diversity failing miserably? Why are sports teams with little diversity winning?

The only really valuable diversity is diversity of ideas and thought which Democrats hagte an oppose vehemently. They want everyone to LOOK different but think in lock step like drones.
 
Diversity to democrats does not include white males unless they constantly apologize for their past sins and the sins of their white male ancestors. Many democrats blame white males for all the evil in the world and some loot, pillage and burn cities to protest those they perceive to be white supremacists. Of course the fact that black on black crime is higher by far than white on black crime is all the fault of the evil white male and his racist police.
That’s how racist-socialist-marxist blm baboons got guilt-tripping American automatons to not only adapt a racist slogan, but to display that racism on their t-shirts and houses as a Passover imitation.
 
Yea, we have something like 300 years of evidence to prove it, you racist inbred moron.

We are a nation of immigrants from all around the world, you'd know that diversity is what made it this country what it is. The underlying thread that wove it all together was a belief that anyone can achieve the American Dream, and now we have a movement of conservative white fragility and unmasked resurgent racism trying to disenfranchise anyone who is not a white, evangelical conservative, or otherwise a member of the Trump Cult.

Got some good life advice for you: Fuck Off.
Actually we started off as a nation of immigrants from primarily Europe who supported themselves and families and contributed to society. Since welfare we have been getting immigrants from 3rd world countries who don't support themselves and families and live off welfare for generations mooching off the US not contributing to it. QUALITY OVER QUANITY....Its crazy stupid to allow the problems and moochers in...

The world is changing where technology will require far fewer workers to do the same task. The billionaires like Bezos see a world where workers won't be needed--most things will be automatic so there will be no jobs especially among the lower educated/dumber class and unskilled. Jobs now that our ghetto/trailer park populations take like McD's and trash collector will NOT exist...there will be no jobs for these people. NONE. Bezos wants everyone to live in tiny apartments and order off amazon using a government issued minimum living check to pay him making him richer and more powerful. What do you think the ghetto rats are going to do all day? MORE crime, more drugs, and more misery

Stop importing the welfare classes---they are destroying america already and will be a bigger problem in the years to come. We actually need less people---far less with better skills and a HIGHER IQ which just can't be taught.

And btw as we increase population of the useless and moochers----natural resources like land to live, food, and WATER will becoming more and more in short supply...........creating more misery for all people and for nature. More people = more environmental problems and more pain for wild animals. Stop the insanity----stop bringing in people especially ones that will only create more problems.
 
Last edited:
Yea, we have something like 300 years of evidence to prove it, you racist inbred moron.

We are a nation of immigrants from all around the world, you'd know that diversity is what made it this country what it is. The underlying thread that wove it all together was a belief that anyone can achieve the American Dream, and now we have a movement of conservative white fragility and unmasked resurgent racism trying to disenfranchise anyone who is not a white, evangelical conservative, or otherwise a member of the Trump Cult.

Got some good life advice for you: Fuck Off.

In biology the more diverse the pool the more likely the odds of survival.

Inbreeding. Or limiting genetic lines tends to create genetic weakness. A problem recognized and demonstrated in history.

So diversity creates a stronger genetic line. Basic biology. Need links or did you attend any schooling?

By examining a problem with many different viewpoints the solution can be found. Often looking outside of the limited initial view.

Take the tanks for the Saturn Rockets. These tanks would hold the cryogenic fuels to power the rockets. One of the problems that they ran into was getting the insulation to adhere to the tank satisfactorily. The Engineers were having a lot of trouble. They ended up hiring surfers who had a lot of experience working with the foam insulation and shaping it. That was the core of their surfboards after all.

Diversity allowed the Rockets to get us to the moon. Not rejecting someone because he wore his hair too long or smoked some funny stuff. Of course there was an absentee problem when the surf was up.

But we can prove it in international business too. Tata Motors owns companies that were founded. Operated. And run into the ground by Whites. Tata is Indian. From India. Not Native American.

Jaguar and Land Rover are turning profits. Because India bought them and made them profitable again. Something Ford couldn’t do.

Kia manages to operate American Factories for profit. Something Ford and GM had to go to Mexico to do.

Then again. You could argue that Ford and GM became profitable after diversification of their manufacturing. To Mexico.

Now none of this will matter to you. You will insist white people are better.

“Our diversity is our strength”

That the racist, bigoted, hateful right rejects this fact is the problem.

Take away every aspect of American life that is influenced by other cultures.
What do you have left?
It‘s odd, foolish and ignorant that you can pretend Democrats don’t refer to skin color in the context they use “diversity is our strength“.
Everybody sane and logical knows they mean “fewer whites makes us stronger”.
Stay on topic, follow the premise of this thread....beyond a basketball team, show us the data that proves “fewer whites” is a strength. We’ll wait patiently.
 
Screen Shot 2021-07-10 at 9.17.00 AM.png
 
We’ve heard this over and over again...Pelosi, Sanders, the Kenyan, Kameltoe Hairyass...they’ve all parroted this...Does it feel good to say such a thing or is there data to prove it?

I'm guessing you're too well conditioned to see the irony inherent in you OP.
 
We’ve heard this over and over again...Pelosi, Sanders, the Kenyan, Kameltoe Hairyass...they’ve all parroted this...Does it feel good to say such a thing or is there data to prove it?

Did Raygun prove it when he said it? That fucking RINO!!!!
MAGA

Reagan is the second worst president this nation ever elected.
He was a bi-partisan piece of filthy shit.
No signature on the 1986 Amnesty Bill = no wetbacks destroying Mexifornia, our public school, healthcare and prison systems and every community they inhabit...No Amnesty Bill = no Mexicrat Party...they couldn’t win CA, NV, AZ, NM nor threaten TX.
 

Forum List

Back
Top