Opinion: Nato boots on the ground?

As Hitler and Stalin agreed to do in the secret part of the Molotow-Ribbentrop-Pact - which was by thre way not fulfilled from Hitler but from the allies of World War 2, They gave Stalin what he had agreed with Hitler.
That's what we call a great diplomatic work. The Germans sold their assets in East Europe for the possibility to destroy Russia's competitors in the West Europe.
I know. Prussia, Pommerania, Silesia, Bohemia, Moravia ... and so on. A lot of genocides (mass-murder and displacement) from the winners of World War 2 which the world never liked to notice - otherwise their heroism would have scratches in their own nationalistic paintwork.
After everything you did, you should be grateful that you avoided total extermination.
 
The Russians have been infiltrating the territory of the modern Ukraine since, at least IX century. Ukrainians were invented in the end of XIX century - first decades of XX century.

It's in the opposite, The Russians are children of the Ukrainians (Kiev Rus). In the Ukraine the first Slavic language was born. You are attacking your "parents", your own roots.

 
Last edited:
A week of show terror

By and large, Kiev has nothing left but terrorist attacks, sabotage and Goebbels propaganda. Abramses are burning, zaluzhnys are running to London, money and shells are not given.
Like I said the terror show is on its way.
At least seven Russian regions were attacked on the night of March 12. Fuel and energy facilities are burning in the Orel and Nizhny Novgorod regions, and seven villages in the Belgorod region have been de-energized. UAVs were also shot down in Voronezh, Kursk, Moscow and Tula regions.
 
@Ringo :
By and large, Kiev has nothing left but terrorist attacks, sabotage and Goebbels propaganda. Abramses are burning, zaluzhnys are running to London, money and shells are not given.
Like I said the terror show is on its way.
At least seven Russian regions were attacked on the night of March 12. Fuel and energy facilities are burning in the Orel and Nizhny Novgorod regions, and seven villages in the Belgorod region have been de-energized. UAVs were also shot down in Voronezh, Kursk, Moscow and Tula regions.

Also your self-talk is only a lie which you do not believe yourselve on your own, isn't it? You support the murderous Putin and his criminal gang who currently throw Russia onto the rubbish heap of history.
 
Last edited:
Indeed we allowed him to take the Rheinland anex Austria and take Czechoslovakia before we acted, then when Hitler went into Poland we declared war, not long before Poland had grabbed part of Czechoslovakia
The name "Czechoslovakia" instead of "Czechogermanoslovakia" is a very good example how totally criminal and stupid the winners of world war 1 had been. The Czechs had always been able to use their own language in Bohemia although they came much later into this German country. Suddenly the Bohemians - once Bohemia had been one of the most important kingdoms of the Holy Roman Empire of German (=united) nation - again: Suddenly the Bohemians had not been allowed to use their own language any longer in Czechoslovakia. That's why Hitler was very popular there. Slogan: Make Germany great again!
 
Last edited:
It is just my opinion. Fucking regime, take a look into your "basic law" and fuck off. And as long as you are terrorizing me with your low-life criminal Schweinevolk thugs, we will never be on friendly terms. One day I might take over and I will reheat the ovens and put an end to your thug army. And you. Fuck you.

There is a severe lack of ammunition in Ukraine. The Ukrainian military is exhausted and the people are war-weary. The main supplier of Ukraine is the Nato. Their stocks are allegedly depleted, they take ammunition from Pakistan, Korea and other countries. So, if we pretend that Nato is now sending troops to Ukraine to fight Russia, how long can they persist on the front line that is hundreds of kilometers long and where hundreds of soldiers fall every day? Where will they take their ammo from?

Is it a realistic scenario? Apparently, it isn´t. So what are the Nato boots supposed to? Will they obtain access to Ukraine by false pretenses and then threaten the government to topple them if they want to negotiate? Probably yes, they might be able to do this as the Ukrainian military is bound at the front lines.

Zelensky must now negotiate a cease-fire with Russia, then rush troops to Kiev and other cities and the whole western border in order to save the country from the total demise the West has in store for them.
macron's idea about nato troops on the ground in ukraine will seem like a good idea until the russians start dropping their fab gliding bombs on them.
 
It's in the opposite, The Russians are children of the Ukrainians (Kiev Rus). In the Ukraine the first Slavic language was born. You are attacking your "parents", your own roots.


The issue is, that people of Kievan Rus, didn't call themselves "Ukrainians" (Borderlanders). They called themselves "Russians".
The world Russia (Russians) - Ros/Rus, sounded like "Roussi" in IX century. Highly likely, it is Slavic prononciation of the Finnish word "Ruotsi" ("Swedes" in modern Finnish), which came from old Scandinavian "Rodsmen" (Rowers, Oarsmen). Highly likely, the word Russians meant "Vikings" And the first western mention about the Russians (predictable it was a spy scandal), the year of our Lord 839 (when neither Novgorod, nor Kiev were captured by the Russians), Annales Bertiniani, mix up Russians with Swedes.
-------------
Misit etiam cum eis quosdam, qui se, id est gentem suam, Rhos vocari dicebant, quos rex illorum chacanus vocabulo ad se amicitiae, sicut asserebant, causa direxerat, petens per memoratam epistolam, quatenus benignitata imperatoris redeundi facultatem atque auxilium per imperium suum toto habere possent, quoniam itinera, per quae ad illum Constantinopolim venerant, inter barbaras et miniae feritatis gentes inmanissimas habuerant, quibus eos, ne forte periculum inciderent, redire noluit. Quorum adventus causam imperator diligentius investigans, comperint, eos gentis esse Sueonum. Exploratores potius regni illius nostrique quam amicitiae petitores ratus, penes se eo usque retinendos iudicavit, quoad veraciter inveniri posset, utrum fideliter eo necne pervenerint; idque Theophilo per memoratos legatos suos atque epistolam intimare non distulit, et quod eos illius amore libenter susceperit, ac, si fideles invenirentur, et facultas absque illorum periculo in patriam remeandi daretur, cum auxilio remittendos; sin alias, una cum missis nostris ad eius praesentiam dirigendos, ut, quid de tulibus fieri deberet, ipse decernendo efticeret.
-----------------

And as medieval Anglo-Saxons were not Americans, same way Kievan Russians were not "Ukrainians".
 
The issue is, that people of Kievan Rus, didn't call themselves "Ukrainians" (Borderlanders). They called themselves "Russians".
The world Russia (Russians) - Ros/Rus, sounded like "Roussi" in IX century. Highly likely, it is Slavic prononciation of the Finnish word "Ruotsi" ("Swedes" in modern Finnish), which came from old Scandinavian "Rodsmen" (Rowers, Oarsmen). Highly likely, the word Russians meant "Vikings" And the first western mention about the Russians (predictable it was a spy scandal), the year of our Lord 839 (when neither Novgorod, nor Kiev were captured by the Russians), Annales Bertiniani, mix up Russians with Swedes.
-------------
Misit etiam cum eis quosdam, qui se, id est gentem suam, Rhos vocari dicebant, quos rex illorum chacanus vocabulo ad se amicitiae, sicut asserebant, causa direxerat, petens per memoratam epistolam, quatenus benignitata imperatoris redeundi facultatem atque auxilium per imperium suum toto habere possent, quoniam itinera, per quae ad illum Constantinopolim venerant, inter barbaras et miniae feritatis gentes inmanissimas habuerant, quibus eos, ne forte periculum inciderent, redire noluit. Quorum adventus causam imperator diligentius investigans, comperint, eos gentis esse Sueonum. Exploratores potius regni illius nostrique quam amicitiae petitores ratus, penes se eo usque retinendos iudicavit, quoad veraciter inveniri posset, utrum fideliter eo necne pervenerint; idque Theophilo per memoratos legatos suos atque epistolam intimare non distulit, et quod eos illius amore libenter susceperit, ac, si fideles invenirentur, et facultas absque illorum periculo in patriam remeandi daretur, cum auxilio remittendos; sin alias, una cum missis nostris ad eius praesentiam dirigendos, ut, quid de tulibus fieri deberet, ipse decernendo efticeret.
-----------------

And as medieval Anglo-Saxons were not Americans, same way Kievan Russians were not "Ukrainians".
Etymological Detective

Doesn't "Moscow" comes from a word meaning "flies" (related prehistorically to "mosquito")? It would fit if it was originally infested with them.
 
So, the West has started a sabotage war in the Russian Federation by the hands of its Ukrainian hirelings. Technically, this is important only in the sense that it gives Russia the moral right to start the same war in Western countries. That's how wars grow, like a tree putting out new branches. Nothing can be done about it.

The peculiarity of subversive wars is that they are waged by other people's hands. And the real puppeteers do not admit that they are the ones fighting the war. Russia has the freedom to act in this way. And it should not bite the stick with which it is being beaten, but beat with its own stick on the head of the one who is holding the stick.
 
So, the West has started a sabotage war in the Russian Federation by the hands of its Ukrainian hirelings. Technically, this is important only in the sense that it gives Russia the moral right to start the same war in Western countries. That's how wars grow, like a tree putting out new branches. Nothing can be done about it.

The peculiarity of subversive wars is that they are waged by other people's hands. And the real puppeteers do not admit that they are the ones fighting the war. Russia has the freedom to act in this way. And it should not bite the stick with which it is being beaten, but beat with its own stick on the head of the one who is holding the stick.
I thought Russia would have reacted a while ago to Western terrorism.
 

Forum List

Back
Top