So Actually, by the end of Clinton-Gore, the Credit Market to Income ratio is more like this one below:
______________________
Clinton Gore would slow the growth of Federal Deficit. By 2000 it was $5.7 tril, less than double the 1990 amount. The Reagan Trajectory had more than tripled that when in place. By 2000, Personal Income was about $8.6 tril. The Total Credit Market had become $37.2 tril. Al Gore had famously invented the internet(?). The Debt to Income Ratio herein, was 3.2
times, and crashing. The $2.5 tril increase was still a lot of money, even then(?). And so buying into the federal deficit had become a Silicon, tinsel idea. idea. Mostly, The low income sector had also prospered with tax credits and other relief.
Bush Cheney would nearly double the federal deficit by QIII 2008, $10.0 tril. The credit market had not tripled, but would be $53.2 tril. Personal Income would be $12.5 tril. And so back to a crashing event the whole thing went. The Macro personal income to debt ratio was 4.3. Famously, mortgages got bundled, and mostly many did not get paid. Under Clinton-Gore, mainly investors had gone unpaid.
So do we see the Reagan Trajectory, put on hold by Clinton-Gore, re-accellerated under Bush Cheney? Personal Income is now about $14.0 tril, with the Total Credit Market still fairly moribund--$57.5 tril. 4.0 times Personal Income. The ratio direction, however, is suddenly the opposite of usual.
____________________________________
I had not lost my memory unit, after all! Yes, There had Been a replay of Matthew 25:14-30 in Bush Cheney. Cheney would get the five talents(?), Paulson would get the two talents(?)--And Bush was already not too up on things, starting out! Famously from Yale Univesity, Bush would note that he had been taught(?) that economies do tax cuts in a recession--even if there are no taxes to cut(?). So that would explain the Ivy League. Student Debts are likely explained in that, too.
The Servant with one talent could not be expected to keep up with the other two(?)! That is a computing flaw, the "Conservative" regulatory economies of history--allowed by Adam Smith, and never addressed. The Ivy League doesn't even suspect that!
When Bush-Cheney-Paulson were finally done: Then the Democrats would set about creating National Health Insurance(?)! They would famously be led by Ivy League faculty--who had managed to not get arrested(?). Both Personal Income and Total Credit Market debt would barely inch up, Credit by 7.5 % and Personal Income about 12%.
So getting back to Clinton-Gore: Rather than just exploding The Credit Market--like an Alan Greenspan--then in fact the Concept was created--Increase the rate of Personal Income growth, most!
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(White Eyes now famous for "Law of Excluded Middle. . . .Class," as in where did it go, and where will it come from? "It's beginning to look a lot like Karl Marx--Everywhere we go!" White Eyes maybe not carve earth into little squares--and sell them(?)!)
______________________
Clinton Gore would slow the growth of Federal Deficit. By 2000 it was $5.7 tril, less than double the 1990 amount. The Reagan Trajectory had more than tripled that when in place. By 2000, Personal Income was about $8.6 tril. The Total Credit Market had become $37.2 tril. Al Gore had famously invented the internet(?). The Debt to Income Ratio herein, was 3.2
times, and crashing. The $2.5 tril increase was still a lot of money, even then(?). And so buying into the federal deficit had become a Silicon, tinsel idea. idea. Mostly, The low income sector had also prospered with tax credits and other relief.
Bush Cheney would nearly double the federal deficit by QIII 2008, $10.0 tril. The credit market had not tripled, but would be $53.2 tril. Personal Income would be $12.5 tril. And so back to a crashing event the whole thing went. The Macro personal income to debt ratio was 4.3. Famously, mortgages got bundled, and mostly many did not get paid. Under Clinton-Gore, mainly investors had gone unpaid.
So do we see the Reagan Trajectory, put on hold by Clinton-Gore, re-accellerated under Bush Cheney? Personal Income is now about $14.0 tril, with the Total Credit Market still fairly moribund--$57.5 tril. 4.0 times Personal Income. The ratio direction, however, is suddenly the opposite of usual.
____________________________________
I had not lost my memory unit, after all! Yes, There had Been a replay of Matthew 25:14-30 in Bush Cheney. Cheney would get the five talents(?), Paulson would get the two talents(?)--And Bush was already not too up on things, starting out! Famously from Yale Univesity, Bush would note that he had been taught(?) that economies do tax cuts in a recession--even if there are no taxes to cut(?). So that would explain the Ivy League. Student Debts are likely explained in that, too.
The Servant with one talent could not be expected to keep up with the other two(?)! That is a computing flaw, the "Conservative" regulatory economies of history--allowed by Adam Smith, and never addressed. The Ivy League doesn't even suspect that!
When Bush-Cheney-Paulson were finally done: Then the Democrats would set about creating National Health Insurance(?)! They would famously be led by Ivy League faculty--who had managed to not get arrested(?). Both Personal Income and Total Credit Market debt would barely inch up, Credit by 7.5 % and Personal Income about 12%.
So getting back to Clinton-Gore: Rather than just exploding The Credit Market--like an Alan Greenspan--then in fact the Concept was created--Increase the rate of Personal Income growth, most!
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(White Eyes now famous for "Law of Excluded Middle. . . .Class," as in where did it go, and where will it come from? "It's beginning to look a lot like Karl Marx--Everywhere we go!" White Eyes maybe not carve earth into little squares--and sell them(?)!)
Last edited:
