Only The Dumbest Fell For The "Insurrection" Claim

If a mob was overrunning the White House, outnumbering the secret service 100 to 1, do you think that they’d worry about whether someone was armed or not as they start pouring through the smashed out windows of barricaded doors?

Nope.

You’d better believe they’d shoot anyone that comes through that window to protect the president.

Common sense. Something you and Babbitt lack.
Amazing to me that, after 50 lies and hoaxes have already been exposed, you still cling to this hoax.

I guess that's why you will remain "incredibly stupid."
 
Unable to accept the judgement of 81 million Americans, Donald Trump spent two months inciting his more weak-minded supporters into making death threats toward Republican election officials and their wives and children, all around the country, forcing these officials and their families to require police protection. Some were even forced into hiding or relocating to new residences at great expense.

After losing 60 court battles in which Trump’s legal arguments bore no resemblance to the lies he told in public to his followers, Trump finally resorted to summoning thousands of terrorists to the District of Columbia, then aimed them at Congress while he retreated back to the White House, whereupon they sacked the Capitol, wounded 140 men in blue, and five lives were sacrificed on the altar of the Big Lie as he sat idly by watching these events for over three hours.

Donald Trump then…











…blamed Nancy Pelosi.




When REPUBLICAN election officials would not buckle under Trump's Big Lie, Trump tried to get them killed.

Trump incited his brownshirts to show up at the officials' homes and offices, and some of them were armed.

They had to get police protection. Some had to actually MOVE.

Not only did these terrorists threaten their lives, they threatened to kill their CHILDREN.

Trump threatened the Georgia Secretary of State with PRISON if he didn't cave to his demands.

One REPUBLICAN got 4,000 threatening texts in two hours after Trump tweeted his phone number. You think he didn't know that would happen? That's what he WANTED to happen.

Trump was playing with dynamite and he didn't care how many people died to get his way.

Trump should be kicked in the mouth every day until he dies.
9cifu0.jpg
 
Delusional.
As you mention 'delusional,' .......is this what you voted for (so sorry to end a sentence with a preposition)?


Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system





Could you explain your vote?
 
They certainly hated each other....as competitors.


Nazis and Communists in Germany both fought for the same ideology......with the only difference being that the former, like today's Democrats, based their socialism on race, while the communists based it on class.


Aims and outcomes were no different.




There is an excellent documentary you can find on youtube......


http://www.livingscoop.com/watch.php?v=MjQwMQ==
Being that Democrat sub-regimes like New Jersey are mostly extreme upper class and extreme lower class separated by ghettos and gated communities, it would appear that the Dems very much do base their socialism on class as well as race. I hate New Jersey! I'm glad I have no relatives living there anymore!

I think the keyword here is "collectivism", a quality which any of these ideologies including corporate capitalism can adopt. That's what makes them the "same". Our military industrial complex was designed with money in mind. Russia's was designed with power and control in mind. Of course money begets power and power CAN beget money. However, because the USSR's system didn't focus on generating capital so much, they ended up not being able to keep their system afloat. The Nazis understood the importance of generating capital. Having their corporations joined at the hip with the state was their goal, while the Soviet State WAS the producer and had power rather than capital gain in mind. This is what bit them in the ass later and caused them to lose their power.
 
Being that Democrat sub-regimes like New Jersey are mostly extreme upper class and extreme lower class separated by ghettos and gated communities, it would appear that the Dems very much do base their socialism on class as well as race. I hate New Jersey! I'm glad I have no relatives living there anymore!

I think the keyword here is "collectivism", a quality which any of these ideologies including corporate capitalism can adopt. That's what makes them the "same". Our military industrial complex was designed with money in mind. Russia's was designed with power and control in mind. Of course money begets power and power CAN beget money. However, because the USSR's system didno't focus on generating capital so much, they ended up not being able to keep their system afloat. The Nazis understood the importance of generating capital. Having their corporations joined at the hip with the state was their goal, while the Soviet State WAS the producer and had power rather than capital gain in mind. This is what bit them in the ass later and caused them to lose their power.
The collectivism only works if the Left's promises to re-mold human nature in accordance with the primary directive:
AI Overview
Learn more


"From each according to his ability" is a phrase commonly associated with Karl Marx, meaning that each person should contribute to society based on their individual capabilities and skills; it's often used in conjunction with "to each according to his needs" to describe the principle of a communist economic system where everyone contributes what they can and receives what they need.


Should there be any doubt about the connections between the Nazis and Communists and the current Democrat Party, notice which prominent Democrat also promised that their ideology woul change human nature:

. "In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."

Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris






Here is the former Democrat presidential nominee, saying the same thing:

Hillary supported the Communist claim of being able to reconstitute human character, the New Soviet Man
. In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”

-http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html
 
The collectivism only works if the Left's promises to re-mold human nature in accordance with the primary directive:
AI Overview
Learn more


"From each according to his ability" is a phrase commonly associated with Karl Marx, meaning that each person should contribute to society based on their individual capabilities and skills; it's often used in conjunction with "to each according to his needs" to describe the principle of a communist economic system where everyone contributes what they can and receives what they need.


Should there be any doubt about the connections between the Nazis and Communists and the current Democrat Party, notice which prominent Democrat also promised that their ideology woul change human nature:

. "In both systems we have the ideology of creating a new man. Both systems don't agree with human nature as it is...they are at war with human nature. Both are based on false biology, and false sociology."

Françoise Thom, professor of Soviet history, Sorbonne, Paris






Here is the former Democrat presidential nominee, saying the same thing:

Hillary supported the Communist claim of being able to reconstitute human character, the New Soviet Man
. In 1969, Hillary Rodham gave the student commencement address at Wellesley in which she said that “ for too long our leaders have used politics as the art of making what appears to be impossible, possible….We’re not interested in social reconstruction; it’s human reconstruction.”

-http://www.wellesley.edu/PublicAffairs/Commencement/1969/053169hillary.html


"At war with human nature"!
SO true!
That's also brilliant!

"I have seen the NEW MAN. He is intrepid and cruel. I was afraid of him." - Adolf Hitler.

Yes, you really do understand the psychology of these people! Krushchev, although a commie himself, was right about the cult of personality thing. He realized that was communism's strength AND it's weakness. It's unclear whether he really wanted to clean up his corrupt party under Stalin, or if he was just using that accusation to take Stalin's place. The same also goes for HItler, Himmler and Goehring. Totally about "cult of personality". That Himmler was really a trip with his occult leanings and personal reincarnation claims! He was trying to create movie set in that castle he obtained where he could act out his fantasies in the company of his besties.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom