easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,233
- 2,645
The FBI gets its opportunity to question Hillary Clinton, but Obama's hand-picked Atty General is doing her best to ensure the short leash is applied to Comey and the limits and restrictions are firmly in place.
Lynch is staying CONSTANTLY in Comey's back pocket, up to her neck in this investigation rather than allowing the investigation to go forward and be briefed of its findings at the end.
Is Hillary getting special political treatment? You better believe it:
"In a case like this you get one shot at the queen,” the source, who was not authorized to speak on the record, said referring to Clinton, the former secretary of state and current front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination. “The pressures are enormous on the agents, as the case has to be airtight and perfect.”
Umm, who decides if you get 'one shot' at Hillary? Obviously Loretta Lynch. If it were anyone else the FBI would be free to call the person in for questioning as they saw fit, not any of this 'You get 1 shot' crap!
“This in an incredibly high stakes, high-wire act,” Hosko said. “Timing is of the essence, but being right is absolutely critical. Comey must be the one to make the case that the law has been broken and a prosecution is recommended.”
The stakes are high and the timing is critical NOT because of how Hillary's private server usage and extremely classified e-mails sent over unclassified means put national security in jeopardy - not that's not the primary focus at all. Hillary Clinton's freedom, her chance to be President, the entire democratic party's 2016 Presidential nomination / nominee is at stake. To hell with national security and what laws may have been broken - this is about high-stakes POLITICS, baby!
“The authority for these formal interview requests by the Bureau is granted by the Attorney General,” the source added."
This has led many to believe that a Grand Jury may have already met regarding this case. Usually subpoenas and immunity are not handed out for 'security reviews', as the State Department and the WH have called what's going on.
"High-profile names convicted of violating Section 1001 include Martha Stewart, as well as former CIA Director David Petraeus."
As experts have already outlined, what happened in this case far surpasses what led to Stewart and Patraeus being arrested.
Does that mean Hillary will be charged/convicted. Make no mistake about it, this FBI questioning is not going to be about 'Guilt' or 'Innocence' but rather if Hillary is charged with a crime or not. You can bet Loretta Lynch will insist on beig right there I nthe same room when Hillary is interviewed and will not hesitate to step in if she feels the need to do so for Hillary's sake. After all, before even being fully briefed on the facs both she and the WH declared Hillary was not the subject of an investigation and they saw no reason why she should / will be charged in the future.
Hillary's testimony, still, my not be as important as that of Pagliano:
"Former Clinton campaign staffer and State Department information technology specialist Bryan Pagliano, who installed Clinton’s private server, was granted immunity by the Justice Department and is cooperating with the FBI."
'One shot at the queen': FBI, AG intensify focus on Clinton email probe | Fox News
Lynch is staying CONSTANTLY in Comey's back pocket, up to her neck in this investigation rather than allowing the investigation to go forward and be briefed of its findings at the end.
Is Hillary getting special political treatment? You better believe it:
"In a case like this you get one shot at the queen,” the source, who was not authorized to speak on the record, said referring to Clinton, the former secretary of state and current front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination. “The pressures are enormous on the agents, as the case has to be airtight and perfect.”
Umm, who decides if you get 'one shot' at Hillary? Obviously Loretta Lynch. If it were anyone else the FBI would be free to call the person in for questioning as they saw fit, not any of this 'You get 1 shot' crap!
“This in an incredibly high stakes, high-wire act,” Hosko said. “Timing is of the essence, but being right is absolutely critical. Comey must be the one to make the case that the law has been broken and a prosecution is recommended.”
The stakes are high and the timing is critical NOT because of how Hillary's private server usage and extremely classified e-mails sent over unclassified means put national security in jeopardy - not that's not the primary focus at all. Hillary Clinton's freedom, her chance to be President, the entire democratic party's 2016 Presidential nomination / nominee is at stake. To hell with national security and what laws may have been broken - this is about high-stakes POLITICS, baby!
“The authority for these formal interview requests by the Bureau is granted by the Attorney General,” the source added."
This has led many to believe that a Grand Jury may have already met regarding this case. Usually subpoenas and immunity are not handed out for 'security reviews', as the State Department and the WH have called what's going on.
"High-profile names convicted of violating Section 1001 include Martha Stewart, as well as former CIA Director David Petraeus."
As experts have already outlined, what happened in this case far surpasses what led to Stewart and Patraeus being arrested.
Does that mean Hillary will be charged/convicted. Make no mistake about it, this FBI questioning is not going to be about 'Guilt' or 'Innocence' but rather if Hillary is charged with a crime or not. You can bet Loretta Lynch will insist on beig right there I nthe same room when Hillary is interviewed and will not hesitate to step in if she feels the need to do so for Hillary's sake. After all, before even being fully briefed on the facs both she and the WH declared Hillary was not the subject of an investigation and they saw no reason why she should / will be charged in the future.
Hillary's testimony, still, my not be as important as that of Pagliano:
"Former Clinton campaign staffer and State Department information technology specialist Bryan Pagliano, who installed Clinton’s private server, was granted immunity by the Justice Department and is cooperating with the FBI."
'One shot at the queen': FBI, AG intensify focus on Clinton email probe | Fox News
