One more step, in the guidelines to becoming a dictator, that Trump took today!

[Toddsterpatriot]

There’s a difference between being persuasive and threatening.

I guess the right continually has a poor understanding of the concept of consent.

Nice company you have there, it'd be a shame if something happened to it.

 

[Marener]

Nice company you have there, it'd be a shame if something happened to it.

Problem is that no one said or implied any such thing.

More like, hey if you let these bad actors post disinformation, people will get hurt and you’ll be at least partially responsible.

 

[Meister]

Of course it's the President's responsibility to provide these numbers ... you want the courts to do this, or worse, the Senate? ...

That's why he fired her, right? Get the right person in there.

 

[j-mac]

You don’t think Trump would be responsive to outcries from his base?

He’s not a democrat

 

[j-mac]

Not really, but it is cowardly.

Your opinion is not a factor

 

[Marener]

He’s not a democrat

Your opinion is not a factor

Apparently no one’s opinion matters at all.

Pretty crazy how you abdicate thinking and just accept anything Trump does for any reason.

 

[Nobody911]

Data revisions by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), such as the downward revisions to May and June 2025 job numbers, reflect updated and more complete information obtained after the initial report. These revisions are routine and stem from late payroll reports, recalculation of seasonal adjustments, and incorporation of finalized tax data. They are designed to improve the accuracy of employment statistics over time and are part of an established multi-step revision process that can continue for months. cnn+1

Regarding their use as "hard evidence" in court, such data revisions would generally not be conclusive legal evidence of wrongdoing or data manipulation because they do not prove intentional falsification. Instead, revisions are an expected part of statistical estimation and reporting by large government agencies based on imperfect, evolving data inputs. The BLS operates with transparency and a documented methodology, and many economists and statisticians regard its data as the gold standard for employment statistics globally. cnn

Legal evidence typically requires a higher standard that includes demonstrating intent, manipulation, or fraud, which simple revisions—due to methodological updates or incomplete initial data—do not satisfy. Revisions themselves reflect an effort to correct and refine estimates, not conceal misinformation. Courts would likely treat BLS revisions as normal statistical updates unless accompanied by credible evidence indicating tampering or fraud. cnn

In summary, while these revisions are important for economic analysis and policymaking, they would not constitute "hard evidence" in court of intentional wrongdoing or data rigging due to their routine and methodologically grounded nature.

Sources:

1. https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/04/business/bureau-of-labor-statistics-jobs-report-explainer-hnk
2. https://www.axios.com/2025/08/01/jobs-report-july-2025-revisions
3.
4. QCEW Revisions
5. https://www.reuters.com/business/da...rump-orders-firing-labor-official-2025-08-01/
6. How abnormal are the revisions in this month’s jobs report?
7. Employment Situation Summary - 2025 M07 Results
8. Productivity Home Page : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics
9. MLR Article : Monthly Labor Review : U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

 

[j-mac]

Apparently no one’s opinion matters at all.

Pretty crazy how you abdicate thinking and just accept anything Trump does for any reason.

I’m not a democrat either…

 

[Marener]

I’m not a democrat either…

You’re not much of anything.

Doesn’t mean the rest of us need to be unthinking and uncaring blanks.

 

[jc456]

I'm sure that's why they were fired, Trump was poring over the job numbers, surrounded by economists who did the math and found out these job numbers were inaccurate.

I'm sure that's why.

Why then we’re they corrected?

 

[jc456]

You’re not much of anything.

Doesn’t mean the rest of us need to be unthinking and uncaring blanks.

So you can’t answer for the inaccuracy with all the technical progress today? Hahaha

 

[Marener]

So you can’t answer for the inaccuracy with all the technical progress today? Hahaha

Chaotic times lead to chaotic data. Like when COVID started, the data was all messed up. People expected it. It’s not the end of the world.

The idea it’s done for partisan reasons is silly.

 

[j-mac]

You’re not much of anything.

Doesn’t mean the rest of us need to be unthinking and uncaring blanks.

You do you man, I’m counting on it…

 

[Marener]

You do you man, I’m counting on it…

All I’m doing is trying to get you to think critically.

It’s too scary for you.

 

[j-mac]

All I’m doing is trying to get you to think critically.

It’s too scary for you.

I do just fine there buddy. With all due respect, I don’t need you to tell me if I’m thinking the right way, or the wrong way according to you…

And why is it Progressive liberal snots always think they can tell someone that,

1. They don’t know
2. Spew this sort of arrogant bull shit in the first place

I mean I really don’t get it sometimes…the correct response to that weak, lame, narcissistic behavior, is to simply say….GFY.

 

[odanny]

Why then we’re they corrected?

Probably because Trump demanded they be "revised"

 

[Marener]

With all due respect, I don’t need you to tell me if I’m thinking the right way, or the wrong way according to you…

You're not thinking at all. You're just letting your daddy do that for you.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

I’m tellin ya, we know your tired ass playbook.

And we know yours.

 

[jc456]

Probably because Trump demanded they be "revised"

900,000 under xiden’s administration? Hahaha

 

[odanny]

It's not coming, it's here.