One hopefully helpful thread about immigration

catatomic

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2012
Messages
1,053
Reaction score
304
Points
198
Immigration is not in the constitution.

Crossing is not illegal because they aren't accross the border until they're in our country.

Therefore they should only be called illegal immigrants if they've committed a crime.

There should not be stigma.

A US Citizen is not allowed to harbor, hire, transport, give documents to or help them accross the border.

They actually help:

"Illegal Immigration" to the United States - Wikipedia

Research shows that illegal immigrants increase the size of the U.S. economy, contribute to economic growth, enhance the welfare of natives, contribute more in tax revenue than they collect, reduce American firms' incentives to offshore jobs and import foreign-produced goods, and benefit consumers by reducing the prices of goods and services.[11][12][13][14] Economists estimate that legalization of the illegal immigrant population would increase the immigrants' earnings and consumption considerably, and increase U.S. gross domestic product.[15][16][17][18] Most scientific studies have shown that illegal immigrants commit less crime than natives and legal immigrants.[19][20][21] Sanctuary cities—which adopt policies designed to avoid prosecuting people solely for being in the country illegally—have no statistically meaningful impact on crime.[22][23] Research suggests that immigration enforcement has no impact on crime rates.[22][24][25]
 
Immigration is not in the constitution.

Crossing is not illegal because they aren't accross the border until they're in our country.

Therefore they should only be called illegal immigrants if they've committed a crime.

There should not be stigma.

A US Citizen is not allowed to harbor, hire, transport, give documents to or help them accross the border.

They actually help:

"Illegal Immigration" to the United States - Wikipedia

Research shows that illegal immigrants increase the size of the U.S. economy, contribute to economic growth, enhance the welfare of natives, contribute more in tax revenue than they collect, reduce American firms' incentives to offshore jobs and import foreign-produced goods, and benefit consumers by reducing the prices of goods and services.[11][12][13][14] Economists estimate that legalization of the illegal immigrant population would increase the immigrants' earnings and consumption considerably, and increase U.S. gross domestic product.[15][16][17][18] Most scientific studies have shown that illegal immigrants commit less crime than natives and legal immigrants.[19][20][21] Sanctuary cities—which adopt policies designed to avoid prosecuting people solely for being in the country illegally—have no statistically meaningful impact on crime.[22][23] Research suggests that immigration enforcement has no impact on crime rates.[22][24][25]
sorry but this isnt helpful at all because we have laws about crossing onto this country without permission,,

you playing word games wont change that,,
 
Immigration is not in the constitution.

Crossing is not illegal because they aren't accross the border until they're in our country.

Therefore they should only be called illegal immigrants if they've committed a crime.

There should not be stigma.

A US Citizen is not allowed to harbor, hire, transport, give documents to or help them accross the border.

They actually help:

"Illegal Immigration" to the United States - Wikipedia

Research shows that illegal immigrants increase the size of the U.S. economy, contribute to economic growth, enhance the welfare of natives, contribute more in tax revenue than they collect, reduce American firms' incentives to offshore jobs and import foreign-produced goods, and benefit consumers by reducing the prices of goods and services.[11][12][13][14] Economists estimate that legalization of the illegal immigrant population would increase the immigrants' earnings and consumption considerably, and increase U.S. gross domestic product.[15][16][17][18] Most scientific studies have shown that illegal immigrants commit less crime than natives and legal immigrants.[19][20][21] Sanctuary cities—which adopt policies designed to avoid prosecuting people solely for being in the country illegally—have no statistically meaningful impact on crime.[22][23] Research suggests that immigration enforcement has no impact on crime rates.[22][24][25]
Read the Federal Immigration Act of 1891 and educate yourself.
 
US Constitution, Article I, Section 8, [Congress has the power] To establish a uniform Rule of Naturalization ...

"Illegal" is anything against the law ... so an "illegal immigrant" is someone who entered the United States outside the laws Congress wrote ... like swimming across the Rio Grande ...

 
Nope. I looked up the Federal Immigration Act of 1891.

It's not illegal to cross a border because that border is not part of the country. It can only be illegal once you've crossed but then the act has already happened.
 
Are you seriously doubling down with a quote that says "ILLEGAL ENTRY and UNLAWFUL ENTRY in the same sentence? LOL, in addition to ignorance of the law, comprehension seems to be a problem for you as well. Typical democrat.
 
Nope. I looked up the Federal Immigration Act of 1891.

It's not illegal to cross a border because that border is not part of the country. It can only be illegal once you've crossed but then the act has already happened.
Crossing the border is not the illegal act---UNLAWFUL ENTRY is. That is why immigration check points are on sovereign soil. SMFH Keep reaching up there, you'll be loaded up with excrement before long.
 
Crossing the border is not the illegal act---UNLAWFUL ENTRY is. That is why immigration check points are on sovereign soil. SMFH Keep reaching up there, you'll be loaded up with excrement before long.
Unlawful entry is only when they do other stuff... if they help each other and possibly get legal help from citizens, they might not need to do unlawful entry.
 
Unlawful entry is only when they do other stuff... if they help each other and possibly get legal help from citizens, they might not need to do unlawful entry.
Anyone who enters the country without proper documentation is in violation of the law. You just aren't real smart. SMH.
 
So when do you shoot them before or after crossing? :oops:
Pre-emption Means Victory

Considering that I was a sitting duck because of the sanctuary of the Vietnam DMZ, we must demand the right to shoot at, bomb, and invade (as did Gen. Pershing) the Mexican side of the border.
 
Anyone who enters the country without proper documentation is in violation of the law. You just aren't real smart. SMH.
I checked and it depends on where you cross.

But it should be anywhere because you can't break the law until you're already in the country and you've crossed, except for different rules at ports.
 
Pre-emption Means Victory

Considering that I was a sitting duck because of the sanctuary of the Vietnam DMZ, we must demand the right to shoot at, bomb, and invade (as did Gen. Pershing) the Mexican side of the border.
If we can do that, we can help other countries to not have problems too.

When Kamala was border czar, she was only in charge of 3 countries but she cut their immigration to the US in half. I've heard it cost money, but haven't confirmed how much.
 
Back
Top Bottom