Go away with your bogus eternal two party system and deep state. Assad ist elected, deal with it or eat shit. He is in his first of two terms.And if You thought Assads and Erdogan come from a different deck - reconsider.
However the Sultan is far from reaching Assad's record of "prolonging democracy":
Sounds EXACTLY like:
Oh, who´s that? Oh yes, your ally.
What?! Do You read the bs You write?
KURDS
For your information: you posted a picture of Stalin.
go open a thread in the I/P forum.
You're wrong, the soviets immediately turned into fierce enemies once they realized Israel was not to become a communist state., supported the Baathi kalbs in Syria.
The propaganda that was used in Syria under Assads, even before the current war is nothing new:
You mean leaders like Netanyahu and Trump have no public support.
For your information: you posted a picture of Stalin.
You're wrong, the soviets immediately turned into fierce enemies once they realized Israel was not to become a communist state., supported the Baathi kalbs in Syria.
The propaganda that was used in Syria under Assads, even before the current war is nothing new:
You mean leaders like Netanyahu and Trump have no public support.
Yes I mean that people are allowed to oppose their leaders in civilized countries.
Quiet idiotic comparing them to a country ruled by one family for 40+ years.
Q.How did Assad come to power, and how many violent revolutions has Syria experienced in the last century?
Go away with your bogus eternal two party system and deep state. Assad ist elected, deal with it or eat shit. He is in his first of two terms.And if You thought Assads and Erdogan come from a different deck - reconsider.
However the Sultan is far from reaching Assad's record of "prolonging democracy":
For your information: you posted a picture of Stalin.What?! Do You read the bs You write?
KURDS
You're wrong, the soviets immediately turned into fierce enemies once they realized Israel was not to become a communist state., supported the Baathi kalbs in Syria.
The propaganda that was used in Syria under Assads, even before the current war is nothing new:
You mean leaders like Netanyahu and Trump have no public support.
Yes I mean that people are allowed to oppose their leaders in civilized countries.
Quiet idiotic comparing them to a country ruled by one family for 40+ years.
Q.How did Assad come to power, and how many violent revolutions has Syria experienced in the last century?
Präsident Assad ist the only Assad in the government. He has done serious reforms and the election results show his success. Of course, you can oppose Assad in Syria but that is not equal to gun wielding terrorists.
Assad came to power through a putsch and there was no revolution since then. Only two Islamist bloody massacres that the civilized Syria has to deal with. One in the eighties, that was short and one that is still ongoing and applauded by those who claim to represent civilization.
stop lying through Your teeth
You're wrong, the soviets immediately turned into fierce enemies once they realized Israel was not to become a communist state., supported the Baathi kalbs in Syria.
The propaganda that was used in Syria under Assads, even before the current war is nothing new:
You mean leaders like Netanyahu and Trump have no public support.
Yes I mean that people are allowed to oppose their leaders in civilized countries.
Quiet idiotic comparing them to a country ruled by one family for 40+ years.
Q.How did Assad come to power, and how many violent revolutions has Syria experienced in the last century?
Präsident Assad ist the only Assad in the government. He has done serious reforms and the election results show his success. Of course, you can oppose Assad in Syria but that is not equal to gun wielding terrorists.
Assad came to power through a putsch and there was no revolution since then. Only two Islamist bloody massacres that the civilized Syria has to deal with. One in the eighties, that was short and one that is still ongoing and applauded by those who claim to represent civilization.
1963 Syrian coup d'état
The 1963 Syrian coup d'état, referred to by the Syrian government as the 8 March Revolution (Arabic: ثورة الثامن من آذار‎), was the successful seizure of power in Syria by the military committee of the Syrian Regional Branchof the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party. The planning and the unfolding conspiracy was inspired by the Iraqi Regional Branch's successful military coup.
The coup was planned by the military committee, rather than the Ba'ath Party's civilian leadership, but Michel Aflaq, the leader of the party, consented to the conspiracy. The leading members of the military committee throughout the planning process and in the immediate aftermath of taking power were Muhammad Umran, Salah Jadid and Hafez al-Assad.
That was also not a revolution. The Baath party putsched the Baath party and was reputsched. So the old Baathist were replaced by the neo Baathists. But Assad was also a neo-Baathist.
You're wrong, the soviets immediately turned into fierce enemies once they realized Israel was not to become a communist state., supported the Baathi kalbs in Syria.
The propaganda that was used in Syria under Assads, even before the current war is nothing new:
You mean leaders like Netanyahu and Trump have no public support.
Yes I mean that people are allowed to oppose their leaders in civilized countries.
Quiet idiotic comparing them to a country ruled by one family for 40+ years.
Q.How did Assad come to power, and how many violent revolutions has Syria experienced in the last century?
Präsident Assad ist the only Assad in the government. He has done serious reforms and the election results show his success. Of course, you can oppose Assad in Syria but that is not equal to gun wielding terrorists.
Assad came to power through a putsch and there was no revolution since then. Only two Islamist bloody massacres that the civilized Syria has to deal with. One in the eighties, that was short and one that is still ongoing and applauded by those who claim to represent civilization.
1963 Syrian coup d'état
The 1963 Syrian coup d'état, referred to by the Syrian government as the 8 March Revolution (Arabic: ثورة الثامن من آذار‎), was the successful seizure of power in Syria by the military committee of the Syrian Regional Branchof the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party. The planning and the unfolding conspiracy was inspired by the Iraqi Regional Branch's successful military coup.
The coup was planned by the military committee, rather than the Ba'ath Party's civilian leadership, but Michel Aflaq, the leader of the party, consented to the conspiracy. The leading members of the military committee throughout the planning process and in the immediate aftermath of taking power were Muhammad Umran, Salah Jadid and Hafez al-Assad.
So, what´s different?
You have a two party system, no matter how many parties exist. People are manipulated to that effect that they either vote democrat or republican and they think they have democracy. There is no hope that there will ever be changes to this because of 24/7 propaganda of the "free media".Go away with your bogus eternal two party system and deep state. Assad ist elected, deal with it or eat shit. He is in his first of two terms.And if You thought Assads and Erdogan come from a different deck - reconsider.
However the Sultan is far from reaching Assad's record of "prolonging democracy":
Two parties? Boy are You dumb.
Tell me how many parties are in average in any civilized country and compare that to Syria.
Then tell me how many consecutive years is a term in average...40+...18?!
You won't dumb me down to Your level.
You have a two party system, no matter how many parties exist. People are manipulated to that effect that they either vote democrat or republican. There is no hope that there will ever be changes. There also parties in Syria btw.Go away with your bogus eternal two party system and deep state. Assad ist elected, deal with it or eat shit. He is in his first of two terms.And if You thought Assads and Erdogan come from a different deck - reconsider.
However the Sultan is far from reaching Assad's record of "prolonging democracy":
Two parties? Boy are You dumb.
Tell me how many parties are in average in any civilized country and compare that to Syria.
Then tell me how many consecutive years is a term in average...40+...18?!
You won't dumb me down to Your level.
Syria is actually a stable country despite the versatility of its population. But Syria is still under exertion of imperialist influence and suffers from reckless neighboring regimes like that in Tel Aviv or that in Ankara. The war in Syria was planned and prepared by the West (Nato), Israel and the Gulf states.So, what´s different?
1963 Syrian coup d'état
The 1963 Syrian coup d'état, referred to by the Syrian government as the 8 March Revolution (Arabic: ثورة الثامن من آذار‎), was the successful seizure of power in Syria by the military committee of the Syrian Regional Branchof the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party. The planning and the unfolding conspiracy was inspired by the Iraqi Regional Branch's successful military coup.
The coup was planned by the military committee, rather than the Ba'ath Party's civilian leadership, but Michel Aflaq, the leader of the party, consented to the conspiracy. The leading members of the military committee throughout the planning process and in the immediate aftermath of taking power were Muhammad Umran, Salah Jadid and Hafez al-Assad.
What the difference between Erdogan and Assad-
32 additional years of tyranny.
Better tell me why Syria is such an unstable country for all these years?
Baathi dream of stability:Syria is actually a stable country despite the versatility of its population. But Syria is still under imperialist influence and suffers from reckless neighboring regimes like that in Tel Aviv or that in Ankara. The war in Syria was planned and prepared by the West (Nato), Israel and the Gulf states.So, what´s different?
1963 Syrian coup d'état
The 1963 Syrian coup d'état, referred to by the Syrian government as the 8 March Revolution (Arabic: ثورة الثامن من آذار‎), was the successful seizure of power in Syria by the military committee of the Syrian Regional Branchof the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party. The planning and the unfolding conspiracy was inspired by the Iraqi Regional Branch's successful military coup.
The coup was planned by the military committee, rather than the Ba'ath Party's civilian leadership, but Michel Aflaq, the leader of the party, consented to the conspiracy. The leading members of the military committee throughout the planning process and in the immediate aftermath of taking power were Muhammad Umran, Salah Jadid and Hafez al-Assad.
What the difference between Erdogan and Assad-
32 additional years of tyranny.
Better tell me why Syria is such an unstable country for all these years?
List of political parties in Syria - WikipediaYou have a two party system, no matter how many parties exist. People are manipulated to that effect that they either vote democrat or republican. There is no hope that there will ever be changes. There also parties in Syria btw.Go away with your bogus eternal two party system and deep state. Assad ist elected, deal with it or eat shit. He is in his first of two terms.And if You thought Assads and Erdogan come from a different deck - reconsider.
However the Sultan is far from reaching Assad's record of "prolonging democracy":
Two parties? Boy are You dumb.
Tell me how many parties are in average in any civilized country and compare that to Syria.
Then tell me how many consecutive years is a term in average...40+...18?!
You won't dumb me down to Your level.
4? You're a joke.
Your magnificent leader has to "clean the pipes" each new decade of his "1st term".
And all You've got is babbling about western democracies.
It is because of Assad and his government that Syria ist still there. Less determined leaderships with less public support could not withstand the cumulative imperialist islamist onslaught for long.Baathi dream of stability:Syria is actually a stable country despite the versatility of its population. But Syria is still under imperialist influence and suffers from reckless neighboring regimes like that in Tel Aviv or that in Ankara. The war in Syria was planned and prepared by the West (Nato), Israel and the Gulf states.So, what´s different?
1963 Syrian coup d'état
The 1963 Syrian coup d'état, referred to by the Syrian government as the 8 March Revolution (Arabic: ثورة الثامن من آذار‎), was the successful seizure of power in Syria by the military committee of the Syrian Regional Branchof the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party. The planning and the unfolding conspiracy was inspired by the Iraqi Regional Branch's successful military coup.
The coup was planned by the military committee, rather than the Ba'ath Party's civilian leadership, but Michel Aflaq, the leader of the party, consented to the conspiracy. The leading members of the military committee throughout the planning process and in the immediate aftermath of taking power were Muhammad Umran, Salah Jadid and Hafez al-Assad.
What the difference between Erdogan and Assad-
32 additional years of tyranny.
Better tell me why Syria is such an unstable country for all these years?
3 revolutions, and a Civil war.
All brought by the Assad.
"But ...but...but Israel"
List of political parties in Syria - WikipediaYou have a two party system, no matter how many parties exist. People are manipulated to that effect that they either vote democrat or republican. There is no hope that there will ever be changes. There also parties in Syria btw.Go away with your bogus eternal two party system and deep state. Assad ist elected, deal with it or eat shit. He is in his first of two terms.And if You thought Assads and Erdogan come from a different deck - reconsider.
However the Sultan is far from reaching Assad's record of "prolonging democracy":
Two parties? Boy are You dumb.
Tell me how many parties are in average in any civilized country and compare that to Syria.
Then tell me how many consecutive years is a term in average...40+...18?!
You won't dumb me down to Your level.
4? You're a joke.
Your magnificent leader has to "clean the pipes" each new decade of his "1st term".
And all You've got is babbling about western democracies.
And I already explained the terms to you, so you prove your memory is just failing:
Israeli fighter jet crashes after being 'shot down'
There is no Civil War since the reaction to the constitution was more Islamist massacres funded by the West.List of political parties in Syria - Wikipedia
4? You're a joke.
Your magnificent leader has to "clean the pipes" each new decade of his "1st term".
And all You've got is babbling about western democracies.
And I already explained the terms to you, so you prove your memory is just failing:
Israeli fighter jet crashes after being 'shot down'
And it took A CIVIL WAR... AGAIN
Politics in the Syrian Arab Republic takes place in the framework of a semi-presidential republic with multiparty representation. President Bashar al-Assad's family and his Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party have remained dominant forces in the country's politics since a 1970 coup.[1][2]
Until the early stages of the Syrian uprising, the president had broad and unchecked decree authority under a long-standing state of emergency. The end of this emergency was a key demand of the uprising, and decrees are now subject to approval by the People's Council, the country's legislature.[3] The Ba'ath Party is Syria's ruling party and the previous Syrian constitution of 1973 stated that "the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party leads society and the state."[4]
Politics of Syria - Wikipedia
There is no Civil War since the reaction to the constitution was more Islamist massacres funded by the West.List of political parties in Syria - Wikipedia
4? You're a joke.
Your magnificent leader has to "clean the pipes" each new decade of his "1st term".
And all You've got is babbling about western democracies.
And I already explained the terms to you, so you prove your memory is just failing:
Israeli fighter jet crashes after being 'shot down'
And it took A CIVIL WAR... AGAIN
Politics in the Syrian Arab Republic takes place in the framework of a semi-presidential republic with multiparty representation. President Bashar al-Assad's family and his Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party have remained dominant forces in the country's politics since a 1970 coup.[1][2]
Until the early stages of the Syrian uprising, the president had broad and unchecked decree authority under a long-standing state of emergency. The end of this emergency was a key demand of the uprising, and decrees are now subject to approval by the People's Council, the country's legislature.[3] The Ba'ath Party is Syria's ruling party and the previous Syrian constitution of 1973 stated that "the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party leads society and the state."[4]
Politics of Syria - Wikipedia
President Assad:
"It is a war between the nation and its enemies, between the people and the murderous criminals.
We never rejected a political solution ... but with whom should we talk? With those who have extremist ideology who only understand the language of terrorism?
Or should we negotiate with puppets the West brought? ... We negotiate with the master not with the slave."
Assad outlines new Syria peace initiative, constitution
They support him and brought victory to him.There is no Civil War since the reaction to the constitution was more Islamist massacres funded by the West.List of political parties in Syria - Wikipedia
4? You're a joke.
Your magnificent leader has to "clean the pipes" each new decade of his "1st term".
And all You've got is babbling about western democracies.
And I already explained the terms to you, so you prove your memory is just failing:
Israeli fighter jet crashes after being 'shot down'
And it took A CIVIL WAR... AGAIN
Politics in the Syrian Arab Republic takes place in the framework of a semi-presidential republic with multiparty representation. President Bashar al-Assad's family and his Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party have remained dominant forces in the country's politics since a 1970 coup.[1][2]
Until the early stages of the Syrian uprising, the president had broad and unchecked decree authority under a long-standing state of emergency. The end of this emergency was a key demand of the uprising, and decrees are now subject to approval by the People's Council, the country's legislature.[3] The Ba'ath Party is Syria's ruling party and the previous Syrian constitution of 1973 stated that "the Arab Socialist Ba'ath Party leads society and the state."[4]
Politics of Syria - Wikipedia
President Assad:
"It is a war between the nation and its enemies, between the people and the murderous criminals.
We never rejected a political solution ... but with whom should we talk? With those who have extremist ideology who only understand the language of terrorism?
Or should we negotiate with puppets the West brought? ... We negotiate with the master not with the slave."
Assad outlines new Syria peace initiative, constitution
Assad is the slave who is incapable of holding a country without the Iranian and Russian handlers.
