Emphasis added:
Other companies, even foreign ones, don't have the problems producing Vehicles in the US that those involved in the bail out did and still do. Why do you think that is?
No one was having trouble producing vehicles. The market changed in the US, dramatically and suddenly. So vehicles we excelled at making since they were highly-profitable and popular in our domestic market, were suddenly non-starters.
Foriegn makers, who excelled at making products for their domestic markets, where gas prices have been high for decades, suddenly had products that went from being significant players into market leaders. Everything trended their way, here, putting our domestic makers in a terrible position, that normally takes many years to change, in design, re-tooling and marketing of new product brands. Friggin' nightmare.
And yet, they turned it around, with our help, which is nothing new (we have for decades made SBA Loans the lifeblood of small business start-ups; we subsidize crude exploration; we fund medical research that is a windfall to bio-techs; we subsidize crops; we pay Commerce to go overseas and encourage new markets for ranges of industries; we spawn salmon vital to our fishing industries ...). And it was a winner, for our critical auto industry, for the communities and small businesses that depend on it, for the states whose revenues depend on it, for the country whose need for foreign trade depends on it ... and ... to the shagrin of the Rightie Minions ... Obama. He was a lock for winning OH, MI and WI when the auto industry rebounded.
So my sincere apologies to the Rightie Obama-haters. This one slipped past Congress, without them realizing it would make things better and insure an Obama re-election. Seems they, and not merely Romney, bet against American Know-how and got spanked for it.
So get over it, and try to do better next time. You lost, but America won. So there's that.