You know, Wolf Blitzer moderated that debate, and he even TOLD HER that the tea baggers have had a long stand against abortion, so referring to Roe v Wade would have been a good place to start.
Additionally, she could have followed that up with the fact that federal judges have stated that DADT should be repealed, and because it's going to end up at the Supreme Court, that is another one she would be disagreeing with.
Would have shown pro life stance and anti gay stance, both of which are held dear by tea baggers. And.........if she would have said something about a federal judge stating that DADT needs to be repealed, which means it's going to show up in the Supreme Court later on and that is another issue she expects to disagree with, she would have been golden.
However.............
A blank stare and telling someone that you'll get it up on your website shows that you really don't know what you're doing and that you depend on others to do your thinking for you.
Which is how she's going to be perceived from now on.
You know.........many of the pundits on the news shows are stating that in style, O'Donnell beat Coons, because she's got quite a bit of television experience, and knows the art of the sound bite.
They also stated that in terms of substance, Coons won hands down, because unlike O'Donnell, he actually knew about what was going on in his state.
Hopefully, the people of DE haven't become a bunch of American Idol zombies who think that if you look good and have a heartwarming story, you should win.
Substance should win over style ANY DAY OF THE WEEK.