O'Donnell just as dumb as Palin when it comes to Supreme Court knowledge

But ignorant.

Compared to whom? Democrats who want government to run banks, the internet, automakers, health care, and any industry dependent on energy?

No.

Compared to Republicans who want to follow the Milton Friedman model; bail out banks or subsidize, automakers, health care and any industry dependent on energy with tax payer money without any sort of return on investment.

Add to that the big agriculture.

And the "internet" was paid for and developed by the government in the first place.
 
But ignorant.

Compared to whom? Democrats who want government to run banks, the internet, automakers, health care, and any industry dependent on energy?

No.

Compared to Republicans who want to follow the Milton Friedman model; bail out banks or subsidize, automakers, health care and any industry dependent on energy with tax payer money without any sort of return on investment.

Add to that the big agriculture.

And the "internet" was paid for and developed by the government in the first place.

The existing infrastructure of the internet has nothing to do with anything government did 30 or more years ago.

That's like saying the iPhone owes its existence to the rotary phone.

Does Rand Paul want to bail out any of the aforementioned industries? Marco Rubio?
 
Liberals vote according to who speaks the best in public.... Conservatives vote according to who is going to do what is best for the country... Sad.

Ah yes, the prior administration was a shining example of that:cuckoo:

Bush On Jobs: The Worst Track Record On Record - Real Time Economics - WSJ

Because the size of the economy and labor force varies, we also calculate in percentage terms how much the total payroll count expanded under each president. The current President Bush, once taking account how long he’s been in office, shows the worst track record for job creation since the government began keeping records. –Sudeep Reddy
 
Compared to whom? Democrats who want government to run banks, the internet, automakers, health care, and any industry dependent on energy?

No.

Compared to Republicans who want to follow the Milton Friedman model; bail out banks or subsidize, automakers, health care and any industry dependent on energy with tax payer money without any sort of return on investment.

Add to that the big agriculture.

And the "internet" was paid for and developed by the government in the first place.

The existing infrastructure of the internet has nothing to do with anything government did 30 or more years ago.

That's like saying the iPhone owes its existence to the rotary phone.

Does Rand Paul want to bail out any of the aforementioned industries? Marco Rubio?

The Evolution of the Internet - PCWorld

Name Change Leaves Military Past Behind

The world's largest network of computer networks got its original name from the U.S. military arm that funded it: Arpanet was for the Advanced Research Projects Agency. Back in 1969 when Arpanet was created, it connected five sites: UCLA, Stanford, UC Santa Barbara, the University of Utah and BBN. In 1983, the U.S. Defense Department spun-off MILNET*, which was the part of Arpanet that carried unclassified military communications. Arpanet was renamed the Internet in 1984, when it linked 1,000 hosts at university and corporate labs.

*MILNET was later re-named the Defense Data Network and finally NIPRNET, for Non-classified IP Router Network
 
Compared to whom? Democrats who want government to run banks, the internet, automakers, health care, and any industry dependent on energy?

No.

Compared to Republicans who want to follow the Milton Friedman model; bail out banks or subsidize, automakers, health care and any industry dependent on energy with tax payer money without any sort of return on investment.

Add to that the big agriculture.

And the "internet" was paid for and developed by the government in the first place.

The existing infrastructure of the internet has nothing to do with anything government did 30 or more years ago.

That's like saying the iPhone owes its existence to the rotary phone.

Does Rand Paul want to bail out any of the aforementioned industries? Marco Rubio?

Libertarianism is the pablum for the weak mind, a vile philosophy that endangers virtue and promotes the Rule of Man.
 
I owned these dumb rightwing monkeys in every thread, look at all their responses to the OP I made, an OP which had a video showing just how dumb O'Donnell was and instead of demanding better candidates from the Republitards they worship they attack me and even Obama, are we the b lame for her inability to answer a question?

wipe your mouth dude....its all over your shirt.
 
I owned these dumb rightwing monkeys in every thread, look at all their responses to the OP I made, an OP which had a video showing just how dumb O'Donnell was and instead of demanding better candidates from the Republitards they worship they attack me and even Obama, are we the b lame for her inability to answer a question?

wipe your mouth dude....its all over your shirt.

Emperor Trajan was Italian, which means he probably wasn't white enough for you.:eusa_whistle:
 
Trajan was from southern Spain, where his father, a Roman Senator, had settled the family. Trajan was a very dark man.
 
I am curious that no conservatives have answered the question concerning her long unemployment record. From what I have gleaned from this forum, there is nothing but contempt for the unemployed by many of the conservatives. Why is this woman getting a pass? She even sued her last employer back in 2004 (or thereabouts) for discrimination against women. She had to drop the suit a few years later because she ran out of money. Understandable, since she hasn't worked since then.

The last few times she ran for office she failed miserably. I really believe the only reason she got by this time was because of the Palin robo-calls. The people in Delaware probably didn't look into her background after they got the call--just remembered the name and pulled the lever.

Mike Castle would have been a much more sensible choice--and would have been a Republican win.
 
You know, Wolf Blitzer moderated that debate, and he even TOLD HER that the tea baggers have had a long stand against abortion, so referring to Roe v Wade would have been a good place to start.

Additionally, she could have followed that up with the fact that federal judges have stated that DADT should be repealed, and because it's going to end up at the Supreme Court, that is another one she would be disagreeing with.

Would have shown pro life stance and anti gay stance, both of which are held dear by tea baggers. And.........if she would have said something about a federal judge stating that DADT needs to be repealed, which means it's going to show up in the Supreme Court later on and that is another issue she expects to disagree with, she would have been golden.

However.............

A blank stare and telling someone that you'll get it up on your website shows that you really don't know what you're doing and that you depend on others to do your thinking for you.

Which is how she's going to be perceived from now on.

You know.........many of the pundits on the news shows are stating that in style, O'Donnell beat Coons, because she's got quite a bit of television experience, and knows the art of the sound bite.

They also stated that in terms of substance, Coons won hands down, because unlike O'Donnell, he actually knew about what was going on in his state.

Hopefully, the people of DE haven't become a bunch of American Idol zombies who think that if you look good and have a heartwarming story, you should win.

Substance should win over style ANY DAY OF THE WEEK.
 
She get's a pass becuase she's a "reformed slut" that gets paid to tell kids not to have sex.
Conservatards only require you parrot thier litmus test, Like Newt she know's it doesn't matter if she walks the walk or stay's off her back.
 
That's the point.

Once they open their mouths, any-and-all doubts (about their tiny little minds), are IMMEDIATELY dispelled.​

there is a poster who calls himself Mr.Shaman who fits this profile.....oops sorry...:eusa_whistle:
 
15th post
You know, Wolf Blitzer moderated that debate, and he even TOLD HER that the tea baggers have had a long stand against abortion, so referring to Roe v Wade would have been a good place to start.

Additionally, she could have followed that up with the fact that federal judges have stated that DADT should be repealed, and because it's going to end up at the Supreme Court, that is another one she would be disagreeing with.

Would have shown pro life stance and anti gay stance, both of which are held dear by tea baggers. And.........if she would have said something about a federal judge stating that DADT needs to be repealed, which means it's going to show up in the Supreme Court later on and that is another issue she expects to disagree with, she would have been golden.

However.............

A blank stare and telling someone that you'll get it up on your website shows that you really don't know what you're doing and that you depend on others to do your thinking for you.

Which is how she's going to be perceived from now on.

You know.........many of the pundits on the news shows are stating that in style, O'Donnell beat Coons, because she's got quite a bit of television experience, and knows the art of the sound bite.

They also stated that in terms of substance, Coons won hands down, because unlike O'Donnell, he actually knew about what was going on in his state.

Hopefully, the people of DE haven't become a bunch of American Idol zombies who think that if you look good and have a heartwarming story, you should win.

Substance should win over style ANY DAY OF THE WEEK.

Being anti-gay in Delaware would not help you win. There is a huge gay community in the state.

There is also a large Wiccan community in Delaware, and her stupid commercial which comes on every 10 minutes (or so it seems) saying "I'm not a witch...", has really been ticking them off.
 
Hopefully she'll wright one on her hand for the next debate. Deer in the lights, I'll put one on my website. IE. I have not ******* clue!!

In order to maintain any semblance of credibility, when calling other people out on their supposed 'stupidity', it would be good if you spelled 'right' correctly. Oh, and IE is not a complete sentence.

In fact, your use of the English language consistently sucks. I am reminded of the old saying "People in glass houses, should not throw stones."

if one is going to criticize spelling, and language usage, it might be a good idea to realize that topspin misspelled the word "WRITE" and not "right". How IS it living in a glass house? :lol:
 
You are one of the least persuasive and most totally dishonest members of the USMB, even by loser-lib standards.

:rofl:


thats because a hell of a lot of posters here on both sides cant stand his annoying "color clashing" posts.....unless it has no colors i just scroll over his shit....he is definitely dishonest.........
 
Last edited:
I owned these dumb rightwing monkeys in every thread, look at all their responses to the OP I made, an OP which had a video showing just how dumb O'Donnell was and instead of demanding better candidates from the Republitards they worship they attack me and even Obama, are we the b lame for her inability to answer a question?


You talk about how you own Republicans in this thread yet Republicans are going to take 100 seats from Democrats this fall..... :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

What the hell, have they legalized drugs or let the monkeys out of their cages at the zoo?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom