O'Donnell just as dumb as Palin when it comes to Supreme Court knowledge

the thing that is interesting here is that this statement by witchy woman is not a GAFFE.... it is a statement which illuminates her ignorance. Clearly, Obama knows how many states there are and his misstatement was indeed a gaffe.... the fact that Christine cannot name a single supreme court case that she disagrees with shows that she is a dim bulb. Now...if the tea baggers want to elect dim bulbs to the United States Senate, they can certainly try...but why would they? To send a message that they are tired of intellectually elite politicians? Or that they want someone in the Senate who is just as ill informed and clueless about the complexities of government as THEY are? I don't understand why tea baggers are so behind this woman.

What are your thoughts on U.S. Rep. Hank Johnson? he seems like a very bright fellow.

Guam capsizing was clearly tongue in cheek.... the question remains... why are YOU afraid to discuss the ramifications of supporting a candidate for the United States Senate that cannot name a single supreme court decision?
 
the thing that is interesting here is that this statement by witchy woman is not a GAFFE.... it is a statement which illuminates her ignorance. Clearly, Obama knows how many states there are and his misstatement was indeed a gaffe.... the fact that Christine cannot name a single supreme court case that she disagrees with shows that she is a dim bulb. Now...if the tea baggers want to elect dim bulbs to the United States Senate, they can certainly try...but why would they? To send a message that they are tired of intellectually elite politicians? Or that they want someone in the Senate who is just as ill informed and clueless about the complexities of government as THEY are? I don't understand why tea baggers are so behind this woman.

What are your thoughts on U.S. Rep. Hank Johnson? he seems like a very bright fellow.


Stick to the topic and stop with red herrings monkey, why are you avoiding discussing O'Donnell's incompetence? No answer is also an admission.

Ok Bass, put down the crack pipe for a moment and focus... your assertion is that she is to dumb to serve and I am asking for your thoughts on a man who is serving who is obviously off his rocker.

It isn't that difficult.
 
How can one discuss a topic when the guy on the other side keeps talking about monkeys?


Hurt

a : to inflict with physical pain : wound
b : to do substantial or material harm to : damage <the dry summer has hurt the land>
2
a : to cause emotional pain or anguish to : offend
b : to be detrimental to : hamper <charges of graft hurt my chances of being elected>

Describes you to a tee, monkey.

That's your answer? WTF is wrong with you? Have you discussed with your parents where/when this all went horribly wrong?



pro·jec·tion

6 b : the attribution of one's own ideas, feelings, or attitudes to other people or to objects; especially : the externalization of blame, guilt, or responsibility as a defense against anxiety
 
the thing that is interesting here is that this statement by witchy woman is not a GAFFE.... it is a statement which illuminates her ignorance. Clearly, Obama knows how many states there are and his misstatement was indeed a gaffe.... the fact that Christine cannot name a single supreme court case that she disagrees with shows that she is a dim bulb. Now...if the tea baggers want to elect dim bulbs to the United States Senate, they can certainly try...but why would they? To send a message that they are tired of intellectually elite politicians? Or that they want someone in the Senate who is just as ill informed and clueless about the complexities of government as THEY are? I don't understand why tea baggers are so behind this woman.

What are your thoughts on U.S. Rep. Hank Johnson? he seems like a very bright fellow.

Guam capsizing was clearly tongue in cheek.... the question remains... why are YOU afraid to discuss the ramifications of supporting a candidate for the United States Senate that cannot name a single supreme court decision?

Clearly? How so?
 
What are your thoughts on U.S. Rep. Hank Johnson? he seems like a very bright fellow.


Stick to the topic and stop with red herrings monkey, why are you avoiding discussing O'Donnell's incompetence? No answer is also an admission.

Ok Bass, put down the crack pipe for a moment and focus... your assertion is that she is to dumb to serve and I am asking for your thoughts on a man who is serving who is obviously off his rocker.

It isn't that difficult.

Tapdance;

an action or discourse intended to rationalize or distract

:lol:

So basically you concede that O'Donnell is a clueless, unqualified dingbat and her performance in that debate was poor, thanks for your understanding.
 
Hurt

a : to inflict with physical pain : wound
b : to do substantial or material harm to : damage <the dry summer has hurt the land>
2
a : to cause emotional pain or anguish to : offend
b : to be detrimental to : hamper <charges of graft hurt my chances of being elected>

Describes you to a tee, monkey.

That's your answer? WTF is wrong with you? Have you discussed with your parents where/when this all went horribly wrong?



pro·jec·tion

6 b : the attribution of one's own ideas, feelings, or attitudes to other people or to objects; especially : the externalization of blame, guilt, or responsibility as a defense against anxiety

You respond with a definition of "hurt" when I ask you why you refer to people as monkeys? Do you think you are hurting people? I just like coming on here and ripping your childish and intellectually bankrupt rants to shreds. If you get a happy feeling calling me "ape" or "monkey".. have at it.

You should hookup with Topspin.. he's just your speed.
 
What are your thoughts on U.S. Rep. Hank Johnson? he seems like a very bright fellow.

Guam capsizing was clearly tongue in cheek.... the question remains... why are YOU afraid to discuss the ramifications of supporting a candidate for the United States Senate that cannot name a single supreme court decision?

Clearly? How so?

it was clear to me.... but if you want to believe otherwise, fine...if you want to start a thread that discusses the idea that someone might in fact think that islands in the middle of the pacific ocean float on the surface, please feel free to do so. This thread is about a senate candidate that was and is the darling of the teabaggers and she doesn't know shit from fat meat when it comes to the United States Supreme Court, and you and the rest of the teabaggers don't seem at all bothered by her ignorance. Can you explain why that is without deflecting? yes or no?
 
Guam capsizing was clearly tongue in cheek.... the question remains... why are YOU afraid to discuss the ramifications of supporting a candidate for the United States Senate that cannot name a single supreme court decision?

Clearly? How so?

it was clear to me.... but if you want to believe otherwise, fine...if you want to start a thread that discusses the idea that someone might in fact think that islands in the middle of the pacific ocean float on the surface, please feel free to do so. This thread is about a senate candidate that was and is the darling of the teabaggers and she doesn't know shit from fat meat when it comes to the United States Supreme Court, and you and the rest of the teabaggers don't seem at all bothered by her ignorance. Can you explain why that is without deflecting? yes or no?

Shit from fat meat? Well, so much for having an intelligent discussion with you.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Well my "monkey" friends... like you Bass... this much is clear. like it or not... it is over. The great experiment in absurdity that is Obama is over.

Have a great November!!! Better stock up on the weed and whatever monkeys eat.
 
Clearly? How so?

it was clear to me.... but if you want to believe otherwise, fine...if you want to start a thread that discusses the idea that someone might in fact think that islands in the middle of the pacific ocean float on the surface, please feel free to do so. This thread is about a senate candidate that was and is the darling of the teabaggers and she doesn't know shit from fat meat when it comes to the United States Supreme Court, and you and the rest of the teabaggers don't seem at all bothered by her ignorance. Can you explain why that is without deflecting? yes or no?

Shit from fat meat? Well, so much for having an intelligent discussion with you.

LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

running away, I see. Can you or can you not explain why teabaggers don't really CARE if their candidates know anything about SCOTUS?
 
Most people have no clue that the Supreme Court even exists most of the time.

Honestly, Ive been keeping up with decisions and I cant think of any off the top of my head that I disagree with that have been recent. Maybe Lawrence v. Texas. but thats a few years old now too.

If your point is that most Americans are as stupid as she is about Supreme Court decisions you're deadwrong, just accept that she was ill-prepared and lacking on knowledge, besides stupid, angry slogans and rants about socialists, O'Donnell and the rest of the Teabagger scum have nothing to offer.

Ignorance, for whatever reason, is not stupidity. Most people are overly concerned with their own lives and arent following up on every single decision of the Supreme Court.

Not entirely sure what being in the Senate has to do with having instant knowledge of Supreme Court decisions anyway. The Senate doesn't take part of making SC decisions. They just advice and consent to the nominees the President picks.

The beauty of the real world is that you can do research on topics in time of need.
 
Are you claiming that O'Donnell is whats best for the country? .....Sad
Alot better than what is in the white house at the moment. Better than who she is running against who claimned to be a bearded marxist. If you claim that run for office in russia not in America.

She doesn't represent the country.. she will represent Delaware. Personally, I don't care, it is up to the people of Delaware. What bothers me is the left's knee-jerk reaction to call people stupid, racist, homophobic, whore, bimbo... etc. It is the reaction of an intellectually bankrupt mind, so lay off the "we're so much smarter than you guys" stuff... it ain't passing muster.

It continues to amaze me that the "better way" offered by the Tea Party is represented by candidates as ill suited for public office as the likes of O'Donnell, Miller, Paladino and Angle.

Do they really think we are that gullible?
 
Bass... you come on here daily and take stupidity and bigotry to new lows. You have very little wiggle room; I'd drop it if I were you.

plus he argues that he is a "TRUE" Conservative....:lol:......ever see him defend ANYTHING even remotly on the right?.....
 
15th post
Well my "monkey" friends... like you Bass... this much is clear. like it or not... it is over. The great experiment in absurdity that is Obama is over.

Have a great November!!! Better stock up on the weed and whatever monkeys eat.

Soggy, you sound like you are on weed. Let's review: the GOP may get the house (I think they will now) but without enough votes to do anything other than to obstruct not change the program; the GOP will not get the Senate. The real interest will be to see how many moderate GOP senators work with the Dem majority because the five or six tea party members make the mainstream GOP puke. The experiment of BHO is not over at all and certainly will not be overturned.
 
How serious are we to take you after reading this juvenile stuff? Monkeys? What is your fascination with referring to your opponents as monkeys? Seriously, what the hell does this mean?

Bass being the head Monkey.... flings Poo like Monkeys do .....his bullshit is the Poo....
 
Back
Top Bottom