Ocasio-Cortez: Wouldn't a Skimpy Little Anitfa Outfit Be Better?

[Carl in Michigan]

She is running for the House of Representatives and yet she send shivers up the spine of every Trumpian.

Trumpians chuckle at their unique thought that Trump is doing great because he makes Liberals crazy, as if that is his job as Presidentmof the United States.

And here is a 29 year old woman shaking Trumpians awake in their sleep with policy rather than undisciplined twitter storms.

The Karmic Wheel turns in strange and mysterious ways.

Sorry, NO. The more she talks, the better for us. She is cute though. Not too bright, but cute.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

She is running for the House of Representatives and yet she send shivers up the spine of every Trumpian.

Trumpians chuckle at their unique thought that Trump is doing great because he makes Liberals crazy, as if that is his job as Presidentmof the United States.

And here is a 29 year old woman shaking Trumpians awake in their sleep with policy rather than undisciplined twitter storms.

The Karmic Wheel turns in strange and mysterious ways.

She is running for the House of Representatives and yet she send shivers up the spine of every Trumpian.

Morons in positions of power scare me.

Just look at those morons, Pelosi and Maxine Waters.
Don't they scare you?

Remind us again what part of Queens Chicago is in....?

Morons in Congress from Queens can't harm Chicago? Are you sure?

Chicago doesn't have its own Congresscritter? Are you sure?

Do you see posters from Queens telling you who to vote for in your own local election from a thousand miles away?

At least you're one state closer than that guy above in Iowa. That's what I keep noticing --- Illinoians and Iowans and Texans and Idahoans and now eastern Europe --- all want to jump into a local election in friggin' Queens.

For somebody who's only running for a district she seems to have rent-free offices operating in heads all over the northern hemisphere. Still waiting to hear from Australia or Brazil, and she can have that side of the planet too.

Chicago doesn't have its own Congresscritter?

We do!
Our morons in Congress are scary too.

For somebody who's only running for a district she seems to have rent-free offices operating in heads all over the northern hemisphere.

She and Bernie are scary stupid. Luckily, her stupid ideas likely won't go far.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Can you believe that that moronic emerging adult has an economics degree from Boston U?

A four year college degree in economics is considered a plus by most folks. But yeah, some people don't trust all that book learning and instead get their world view from other sources like Limbaugh, Hannity, Alex Jones etc.

some people don't trust all that book learning

And some of us wonder how that book learning ended up with her advocating the exact opposite?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Can you believe that that moronic emerging adult has an economics degree from Boston U?

A four year college degree in economics is considered a plus by most folks. But yeah, some people don't trust all that book learning and instead get their world view from other sources like Limbaugh, Hannity, Alex Jones etc.

What does any of that have to do with stupidity of Cortez?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Can you believe that that moronic emerging adult has an economics degree from Boston U?

That's for another thread, but wouldn't it be easier to listen to her if she was wearing a skimpy little antifa outfit?

She’d sound better with her mouth full.

Chupacabra

Puta con verga.

Segregacionista.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Can you believe that that moronic emerging adult has an economics degree from Boston U?

That's for another thread, but wouldn't it be easier to listen to her if she was wearing a skimpy little antifa outfit?

She’d sound better with her mouth full.

Chupacabra

Puta con verga.

And of course, her being Hispanic doesn't help either, does it? Maybe if she were low class like you and got down in the gutter and flung some cuss words in Spanish around you might respect her more?

She isn’t highspanic. She’s a rich brat from NY with a Spanish name. But that’s enough for a segregationist like you, eh?

 

[Pogo]

Can you believe that that moronic emerging adult has an economics degree from Boston U?

That's for another thread, but wouldn't it be easier to listen to her if she was wearing a skimpy little antifa outfit?

She’d sound better with her mouth full.

Chupacabra

Puta con verga.

And of course, her being Hispanic doesn't help either, does it? Maybe if she were low class like you and got down in the gutter and flung some cuss words in Spanish around you might respect her more?

She isn’t highspanic. She’s a rich brat from NY with a Spanish name. But that’s enough for a segregationist like you, eh?

Pogo's translation guide:

Rashmanish: "She isn’t highspanic [sic]. She’s a rich brat from NY with a Spanish name"
English: "born to a working-class Puerto Rican family in the Bronx"

-- Biography.com
​

 

[OODA_Loop]

And here is a 29 year old woman shaking Trumpians awake in their sleep with policy rather than undisciplined twitter storms.

What specifically is her most effective and plausible policy ?

 

[Nosmo King]

And here is a 29 year old woman shaking Trumpians awake in their sleep with policy rather than undisciplined twitter storms.

What specifically is her most effective and plausible policy ?

Medicare for all. It's effective because it extends healthcare to all citizens. It's plausible because the payments to private health care insurers is shared by employers and employees. If those premiums were taxes instead, our healthcare costs would be reduced, Americans would be healthier and work longer and live longer. Every other industrialized nation enjoys universal healthcare. Have they lost freedom? Quality of care? Why is it whenever a call for war comes along, we have the money. Whenever a massive tax cut for the wealthy comes along, we can afford it. But whenever benefits for all Americans is requested, we get cheap?

Isn't it more moral to provide healthcare for all than denying healthcare to some?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

And here is a 29 year old woman shaking Trumpians awake in their sleep with policy rather than undisciplined twitter storms.

What specifically is her most effective and plausible policy ?

Medicare for all. It's effective because it extends healthcare to all citizens. It's plausible because the payments to private health care insurers is shared by employers and employees. If those premiums were taxes instead, our healthcare costs would be reduced, Americans would be healthier and work longer and live longer. Every other industrialized nation enjoys universal healthcare. Have they lost freedom? Quality of care? Why is it whenever a call for war comes along, we have the money. Whenever a massive tax cut for the wealthy comes along, we can afford it. But whenever benefits for all Americans is requested, we get cheap?

Isn't it more moral to provide healthcare for all than denying healthcare to some?

Never does putting government in charge of running anything result in efficiency. Usually the opposite.
And those taxes have to be generated by market capitalism so why introduce another more inefficient middle-man and increase overhead?

 

[Nosmo King]

And here is a 29 year old woman shaking Trumpians awake in their sleep with policy rather than undisciplined twitter storms.

What specifically is her most effective and plausible policy ?

Medicare for all. It's effective because it extends healthcare to all citizens. It's plausible because the payments to private health care insurers is shared by employers and employees. If those premiums were taxes instead, our healthcare costs would be reduced, Americans would be healthier and work longer and live longer. Every other industrialized nation enjoys universal healthcare. Have they lost freedom? Quality of care? Why is it whenever a call for war comes along, we have the money. Whenever a massive tax cut for the wealthy comes along, we can afford it. But whenever benefits for all Americans is requested, we get cheap?

Isn't it more moral to provide healthcare for all than denying healthcare to some?

Never does putting government in charge of running anything result in efficiency. Usually the opposite.
And those taxes have to be generated by market capitalism so why introduce another more inefficient middle-man and increase overhead?

Is military spending always responsibly handled? Is there that same old government inefficiency applicable there? How about farm subsidies? Bank bailouts? And why is I really so inefficient under Republican control? Weren't yinz guys supposed to be tha masters of smaller, more efficient government?

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

And here is a 29 year old woman shaking Trumpians awake in their sleep with policy rather than undisciplined twitter storms.

What specifically is her most effective and plausible policy ?

Medicare for all. It's effective because it extends healthcare to all citizens. It's plausible because the payments to private health care insurers is shared by employers and employees. If those premiums were taxes instead, our healthcare costs would be reduced, Americans would be healthier and work longer and live longer. Every other industrialized nation enjoys universal healthcare. Have they lost freedom? Quality of care? Why is it whenever a call for war comes along, we have the money. Whenever a massive tax cut for the wealthy comes along, we can afford it. But whenever benefits for all Americans is requested, we get cheap?

Isn't it more moral to provide healthcare for all than denying healthcare to some?

Never does putting government in charge of running anything result in efficiency. Usually the opposite.
And those taxes have to be generated by market capitalism so why introduce another more inefficient middle-man and increase overhead?

Is military spending always responsibly handled? Is there that same old government inefficiency applicable there? How about farm subsidies? Bank bailouts? And why is I really so inefficient under Republican control? Weren't yinz guys supposed to be tha masters of smaller, more efficient government?

I'm not republican.
National defense is a staple of government responsibility. Health care is a personal matter. Poorly run military financing doesn't excuse more poorly run gov fiscal matters.
Poorly run gov fiscal matters don't excuse more poorly run gov fiscal matters.
Or, you shouldn't be wishing for more gov inefficiency by citing previous gov inefficiency.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Oh you know she's crazy. I'd hit it and quit it.

That red lipstick means she wants the D.

 

[theHawk]

It would make listening to her much easier if she wore a skimpy llitle antifa outfit, that's for sure!:

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: Under Medicare For All, You Won't Have To Worry About Funeral Expenses

Aren’t Anqeefa outfits all black and face covered with a mask? Come to think of it, they dress more in compliance with Sharia Law.

 

[Marion Morrison]

It would make listening to her much easier if she wore a skimpy llitle antifa outfit, that's for sure!:

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: Under Medicare For All, You Won't Have To Worry About Funeral Expenses

Aren’t Anqeefa outfits all black and face covered with a mask? Come to think of it, they dress more in compliance with Sharia Law.

I think skinny jeans are a must for Antifa.

 

[Unkotare]

She is running for the House of Representatives and yet she send shivers up the spine of every Trumpian.

....

“Spine” is not the right word...

 

[Unkotare]

Can you believe that that moronic emerging adult has an economics degree from Boston U?

Could be she made extensive use of ‘office hours’ with her professors.

 

[OODA_Loop]

And here is a 29 year old woman shaking Trumpians awake in their sleep with policy rather than undisciplined twitter storms.

What specifically is her most effective and plausible policy ?

Medicare for all. It's effective because it extends healthcare to all citizens. It's plausible because the payments to private health care insurers is shared by employers and employees. If those premiums were taxes instead, our healthcare costs would be reduced, Americans would be healthier and work longer and live longer. Every other industrialized nation enjoys universal healthcare. Have they lost freedom? Quality of care? Why is it whenever a call for war comes along, we have the money. Whenever a massive tax cut for the wealthy comes along, we can afford it. But whenever benefits for all Americans is requested, we get cheap?

Isn't it more moral to provide healthcare for all than denying healthcare to some?

Healthcare is provided by the individual for the individual in this Country. Pretty simple.

 

[Roudy]

Can you believe that that moronic emerging adult has an economics degree from Boston U?

Could be she made extensive use of ‘office hours’ with her professors.

BU isn't anything to write home about. It's one of the many third rate national universities.

 

[Tom Horn]

Nice chi chi's.....