Obama’s Global Warming Plan Cost Poor Americans $44 Billion, Raises Taxes By 166%

But you have to remember: It's only because that progressive/dem party CARES about you little people and THEY KNOW BEST. How anyone can belong to such a snake party

snip:
President Obama’s global warming plan would cost America’s poorest families billions annually, according to a report published Thursday by the Manhattan Institute.

The study estimates that Obama’s global warming plan would increase the costs of living for the poorest American families an additional $19 billion per year, equivalent to increasing their taxes by 166 percent. The tax increase would also raise taxes on other poor families by an extra $25 billion, equal to a 33 percent tax increase. Living costs for the richest households would only increase by 4 percent.

Obama wants to implement the Enviromental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan, which would effectively tax four-fifths of American carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and be similar in scope to an economy-wide carbon tax. In addition, Obama has proposed a $10.25-per-barrel oil tax.

Neither plan would have a large impact on global warming. Data modeling created by the EPA and run by the libertarian Cato Institute shows that the Clean Power Plan would only have adverted 0.019° Celsius of warming by the year 2100, an amount so small it couldn’t be detected.


“The greatest tragedy of the Democrats’ climate agenda is not how little it will accomplish but rather how costly it will be for those least able to afford it,” Oren Cass, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute who authored the study, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.




The study determined that taxing CO2 emissions or gasoline inherently hurts the poor more than the rich because the lowest-income U.S. households spend roughly 35 percent of their annual income on energy, while the highest income households spent less than 3 percent of their income on energy.


Though the study is based on projections of future tax increases, the average American’s electric bill has gone up 10 percent since Obama took office in January, 2009, due to federal regulations.


ALL of it here
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/23/obamas-global-warming-plan-cost-poor-americans-44-billion-raises-taxes-by-166/#ixzz46psu61jf


the phony global warming plan hurts poor people all across the globe

undeveloped nations get to remain undeveloped nations

and continue to die under a sweltering sun and die

in freezing conditions because the can not obtain

cheap reliable energy to produce air conditioning and heating and running water
Now here is a poster that get's it...
 
The US Republican Party is the only mainstream political party in the world which continues to deny global warming. Those who oppose global warming and fund the denial movement, are those who profit most from the petroleum industry.

There is a lot of money to be made in the emerging energy technologies. The smart people are jumping right on that, and like the auto industry, the European and Asian countries which are working on the science and training their young scientists for the new energy markets, while Americans continue to teach their children that it's a hoax.

For years, Americans coddled their auto industry at home, refusing to keep their emissions standards in line with the rest of the world, and your auto industry nearly collapsed because their cars lagged so far behind the Europeans and the Japanese. Now they're playing catch up. You're in danger of being left behind in the move from fossil fuels to cleaner energy, because of the lies of the Koch Bros. and others with a direct vested interest in the status quo.
 
The US Republican Party is the only mainstream political party in the world which continues to deny global warming. Those who oppose global warming and fund the denial movement, are those who profit most from the petroleum industry.
Since when does the propensity of the opinions of world political parties mean a damn thing with respect to anything? If the the Republican Party was the only "mainstream political party in the world" to insist that the law of gravity was real would that mean that gravity no longer exists?

There is a lot of money to be made in the emerging energy technologies. The smart people are jumping right on that, and like the auto industry, the European and Asian countries which are working on the science and training their young scientists for the new energy markets, while Americans continue to teach their children that it's a hoax.
.
Then why the hell does it require government subsidies and regulatory favoritism? If there is "a lot of money to be made" in it then doesn't it stand to reason that private capital will flow into that sector without requiring government interference?
 
The US Republican Party is the only mainstream political party in the world which continues to deny global warming. Those who oppose global warming and fund the denial movement, are those who profit most from the petroleum industry.
Since when does the propensity of the opinions of world political parties mean a damn thing with respect to anything? If the the Republican Party was the only "mainstream political party in the world" to insist that the law of gravity was real would that mean that gravity no longer exists?

There is a lot of money to be made in the emerging energy technologies. The smart people are jumping right on that, and like the auto industry, the European and Asian countries which are working on the science and training their young scientists for the new energy markets, while Americans continue to teach their children that it's a hoax.
.
Then why the hell does it require government subsidies and regulatory favoritism? If there is "a lot of money to be made" in it then doesn't it stand to reason that private capital will flow into that sector without requiring government interference?

It's cheaper and, in the short term, to maintain the status quo, however unsustainable that may be. Corporations that spend heavy on R&D are not going to keep their shareholders happy for long.

Research and development costs big bucks with no guarantee of a return. It costs a lot to start a whole new technology. The internet was originally funded by tax dollars and government research. Maybe that was a waste too.
 
The US Republican Party is the only mainstream political party in the world which continues to deny global warming. Those who oppose global warming and fund the denial movement, are those who profit most from the petroleum industry.
Since when does the propensity of the opinions of world political parties mean a damn thing with respect to anything? If the the Republican Party was the only "mainstream political party in the world" to insist that the law of gravity was real would that mean that gravity no longer exists?

There is a lot of money to be made in the emerging energy technologies. The smart people are jumping right on that, and like the auto industry, the European and Asian countries which are working on the science and training their young scientists for the new energy markets, while Americans continue to teach their children that it's a hoax.
.
Then why the hell does it require government subsidies and regulatory favoritism? If there is "a lot of money to be made" in it then doesn't it stand to reason that private capital will flow into that sector without requiring government interference?

It's cheaper and, in the short term, to maintain the status quo, however unsustainable that may be. Corporations that spend heavy on R&D are not going to keep their shareholders happy for long.
That's funny then why where all the major energy companies heavily engaged in the R&D for alternative energy sources long before the federal government ever stuck it's nasty tax payer money wasting snout into it?

Research and development costs big bucks with no guarantee of a return.
No kidding, except private companies do it ALL THE TIME WITHOUT GOVERNMENT INTERFERENCE, SUBSIDIES OR REGULATORY FAVORITISM. The federal government has managed to turn what should have been an Easter egg hunt (long term transition to alternative sources of energy) into a buttfuckathon of pigs feeding at the taxpayer trough.

The internet was originally funded by tax dollars and government research. Maybe that was a waste too.
Yes it was a WASTE, the "internet" as conceived by ARPA was essentially a hobbyist toy until private business made something useful out of it, in fact given all the inefficient, insecure legacy crap that we are still trying to work out from under from the original conception it would have been better left to the private sector to wholly develop it in the first place.
 
The US Republican Party is the only mainstream political party in the world which continues to deny global warming. Those who oppose global warming and fund the denial movement, are those who profit most from the petroleum industry.
Since when does the propensity of the opinions of world political parties mean a damn thing with respect to anything? If the the Republican Party was the only "mainstream political party in the world" to insist that the law of gravity was real would that mean that gravity no longer exists?

There is a lot of money to be made in the emerging energy technologies. The smart people are jumping right on that, and like the auto industry, the European and Asian countries which are working on the science and training their young scientists for the new energy markets, while Americans continue to teach their children that it's a hoax.
.
Then why the hell does it require government subsidies and regulatory favoritism? If there is "a lot of money to be made" in it then doesn't it stand to reason that private capital will flow into that sector without requiring government interference?


Lets just call you a wackjob bullshiter until you got some credibile science to back anything you say...

Can you find any major scientific organisation that doesn't say GW is real and man made...

I see in other threads your crowd say Obama is the laughing stock of the world... Believe me the whole world thinks your inbred anti-science crowd are the laughing stock..

Lets explain something to you, there are experts and they tell you stuff in there field... Sticking your head in the sand and saying it is not so OR finding some discredited person who will tell you different does not alter the facts... Any fool can find someone to tell you what you want to believe i.e. Trump.... You still don't get it, the RW in America are the arse end of every joke worldwide and if it wasn't for the US arsed version of democracy you would have been regulated into the corner decades ago....

The GOP are on the wrong side of history, future technologies and the environment...
 
The US Republican Party is the only mainstream political party in the world which continues to deny global warming. Those who oppose global warming and fund the denial movement, are those who profit most from the petroleum industry.
Since when does the propensity of the opinions of world political parties mean a damn thing with respect to anything? If the the Republican Party was the only "mainstream political party in the world" to insist that the law of gravity was real would that mean that gravity no longer exists?

There is a lot of money to be made in the emerging energy technologies. The smart people are jumping right on that, and like the auto industry, the European and Asian countries which are working on the science and training their young scientists for the new energy markets, while Americans continue to teach their children that it's a hoax.
.
Then why the hell does it require government subsidies and regulatory favoritism? If there is "a lot of money to be made" in it then doesn't it stand to reason that private capital will flow into that sector without requiring government interference?


Lets just call you a wackjob bullshiter until you got some credibile science to back anything you say...
Let's just call you a heavily propagandized, partisan lemming until you can learn to read English and follow along with the conversation that you're responding to....

Can you find any major scientific organisation that doesn't say GW is real and man made...
Apparently you're too fucking brain dead to notice that nobody said anything about the veracity of the claims as to whether "GW is real and man made", the subject of the discussion was/is the credibility of a preponderance of the opinions of major political parties and the wisdom of government funded R&D into alternative energy sources.

Now go back to playing with the rest of the kindergarten class until you get to the part where you learn how to read and comprehend written English.
 
But you have to remember: It's only because that progressive/dem party CARES about you little people and THEY KNOW BEST. How anyone can belong to such a snake party

snip:
President Obama’s global warming plan would cost America’s poorest families billions annually, according to a report published Thursday by the Manhattan Institute.

The study estimates that Obama’s global warming plan would increase the costs of living for the poorest American families an additional $19 billion per year, equivalent to increasing their taxes by 166 percent. The tax increase would also raise taxes on other poor families by an extra $25 billion, equal to a 33 percent tax increase. Living costs for the richest households would only increase by 4 percent.

Obama wants to implement the Enviromental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan, which would effectively tax four-fifths of American carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and be similar in scope to an economy-wide carbon tax. In addition, Obama has proposed a $10.25-per-barrel oil tax.

Neither plan would have a large impact on global warming. Data modeling created by the EPA and run by the libertarian Cato Institute shows that the Clean Power Plan would only have adverted 0.019° Celsius of warming by the year 2100, an amount so small it couldn’t be detected.


“The greatest tragedy of the Democrats’ climate agenda is not how little it will accomplish but rather how costly it will be for those least able to afford it,” Oren Cass, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute who authored the study, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.




The study determined that taxing CO2 emissions or gasoline inherently hurts the poor more than the rich because the lowest-income U.S. households spend roughly 35 percent of their annual income on energy, while the highest income households spent less than 3 percent of their income on energy.


Though the study is based on projections of future tax increases, the average American’s electric bill has gone up 10 percent since Obama took office in January, 2009, due to federal regulations.


ALL of it here
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/23/obamas-global-warming-plan-cost-poor-americans-44-billion-raises-taxes-by-166/#ixzz46psu61jf

The cost is a drop in the bucket compared to the money were forced to spend so our military can bully & terrorize the entire world.
 
The US Republican Party is the only mainstream political party in the world which continues to deny global warming. Those who oppose global warming and fund the denial movement, are those who profit most from the petroleum industry.
Since when does the propensity of the opinions of world political parties mean a damn thing with respect to anything? If the the Republican Party was the only "mainstream political party in the world" to insist that the law of gravity was real would that mean that gravity no longer exists?

There is a lot of money to be made in the emerging energy technologies. The smart people are jumping right on that, and like the auto industry, the European and Asian countries which are working on the science and training their young scientists for the new energy markets, while Americans continue to teach their children that it's a hoax.
.
Then why the hell does it require government subsidies and regulatory favoritism? If there is "a lot of money to be made" in it then doesn't it stand to reason that private capital will flow into that sector without requiring government interference?


Lets just call you a wackjob bullshiter until you got some credibile science to back anything you say...
Let's just call you a heavily propagandized, partisan lemming until you can learn to read English and follow along with the conversation that you're responding to....

Can you find any major scientific organisation that doesn't say GW is real and man made...
Apparently you're too fucking brain dead to notice that nobody said anything about the veracity of the claims as to whether "GW is real and man made", the subject of the discussion was/is the credibility of a preponderance of the opinions of major political parties and the wisdom of government funded R&D into alternative energy sources.

Now go back to playing with the rest of the kindergarten class until you get to the part where you learn how to read and comprehend written English.

GW is costly but the cost of doing nothing huge...

Actually a proper study done some not paid by the Koch Brothers (CitiBank):
What is perhaps most surprising is that looking at the potential total spend on energy over the next quarter century, on an undiscounted basis the cost of following a low carbon route at $190.2 trillion is actually cheaper than our ‘Inaction’ scenario at $192 trillion. This, as we examine in this chapter, is due to the rapidly falling costs of renewables, which combined with lower fuel usage from energy efficiency investments actually result in significantly lower long term fuel bill. Yes, we have to invest more in the early years, but we potentially save later, not to mention the liabilities of climate change that we potentially avoid.

Citi report: slowing global warming would save tens of trillions of dollars | Dana Nuccitelli


So we the OP saying GW is costing the poor and Stephanie caming afterwards saying it is Wealth distribution from Rich to Poor.

Make your minds, get your conspiracy theories straight...
 
? If the the Republican Party was the only "mainstream political party in the world" to insist that the law of gravity was real would that mean that gravity no longer exists?




Here is my bet. If the republicans told YOU that gravity wasn't real, you would believe it.

Is that true or not? Let's see YOU prove gravity exists.
 
But you have to remember: It's only because that progressive/dem party CARES about you little people and THEY KNOW BEST. How anyone can belong to such a snake party

snip:
President Obama’s global warming plan would cost America’s poorest families billions annually, according to a report published Thursday by the Manhattan Institute.

The study estimates that Obama’s global warming plan would increase the costs of living for the poorest American families an additional $19 billion per year, equivalent to increasing their taxes by 166 percent. The tax increase would also raise taxes on other poor families by an extra $25 billion, equal to a 33 percent tax increase. Living costs for the richest households would only increase by 4 percent.

Obama wants to implement the Enviromental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan, which would effectively tax four-fifths of American carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and be similar in scope to an economy-wide carbon tax. In addition, Obama has proposed a $10.25-per-barrel oil tax.

Neither plan would have a large impact on global warming. Data modeling created by the EPA and run by the libertarian Cato Institute shows that the Clean Power Plan would only have adverted 0.019° Celsius of warming by the year 2100, an amount so small it couldn’t be detected.


“The greatest tragedy of the Democrats’ climate agenda is not how little it will accomplish but rather how costly it will be for those least able to afford it,” Oren Cass, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute who authored the study, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.




The study determined that taxing CO2 emissions or gasoline inherently hurts the poor more than the rich because the lowest-income U.S. households spend roughly 35 percent of their annual income on energy, while the highest income households spent less than 3 percent of their income on energy.


Though the study is based on projections of future tax increases, the average American’s electric bill has gone up 10 percent since Obama took office in January, 2009, due to federal regulations.


ALL of it here
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/23/obamas-global-warming-plan-cost-poor-americans-44-billion-raises-taxes-by-166/#ixzz46psu61jf

The cost is a drop in the bucket compared to the money were forced to spend so our military can bully & terrorize the entire world.

that same military sacrificed and lost many men and women along with their families suffering, so you can have the right to put them down. and the one THING this federal Government is in charge of: is the PROTECTION of the people they represent here at home and abroad. now I know some of you might not know that. Globull warming IS NOT in their handbook as one of their JOBS
 
But you have to remember: It's only because that progressive/dem party CARES about you little people and THEY KNOW BEST. How anyone can belong to such a snake party

snip:
President Obama’s global warming plan would cost America’s poorest families billions annually, according to a report published Thursday by the Manhattan Institute.

The study estimates that Obama’s global warming plan would increase the costs of living for the poorest American families an additional $19 billion per year, equivalent to increasing their taxes by 166 percent. The tax increase would also raise taxes on other poor families by an extra $25 billion, equal to a 33 percent tax increase. Living costs for the richest households would only increase by 4 percent.

Obama wants to implement the Enviromental Protection Agency’s Clean Power Plan, which would effectively tax four-fifths of American carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and be similar in scope to an economy-wide carbon tax. In addition, Obama has proposed a $10.25-per-barrel oil tax.

Neither plan would have a large impact on global warming. Data modeling created by the EPA and run by the libertarian Cato Institute shows that the Clean Power Plan would only have adverted 0.019° Celsius of warming by the year 2100, an amount so small it couldn’t be detected.


“The greatest tragedy of the Democrats’ climate agenda is not how little it will accomplish but rather how costly it will be for those least able to afford it,” Oren Cass, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute who authored the study, told The Daily Caller News Foundation.




The study determined that taxing CO2 emissions or gasoline inherently hurts the poor more than the rich because the lowest-income U.S. households spend roughly 35 percent of their annual income on energy, while the highest income households spent less than 3 percent of their income on energy.


Though the study is based on projections of future tax increases, the average American’s electric bill has gone up 10 percent since Obama took office in January, 2009, due to federal regulations.


ALL of it here
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/04/23/obamas-global-warming-plan-cost-poor-americans-44-billion-raises-taxes-by-166/#ixzz46psu61jf

The cost is a drop in the bucket compared to the money were forced to spend so our military can bully & terrorize the entire world.

that same military sacrificed and lost many men and women along with their families suffering, so you can have the right to put them down. and the one THING this federal Government is in charge of: is the PROTECTION of the people they represent here at home and abroad. now I know some of you might not know that. Globull warming IS NOT in their handbook as one of their JOBS

They should discourage that sort of behavior than
 
? If the the Republican Party was the only "mainstream political party in the world" to insist that the law of gravity was real would that mean that gravity no longer exists?




Here is my bet. If the republicans told YOU that gravity wasn't real, you would believe it.

Is that true or not? Let's see YOU prove gravity exists.
Ahh... another mindless, hyper-partisan gub'mint worshiper that lacks the ability to read and comprehend English, please remember to issue a press release when you acquire the wherewithal to post something that's actually worth reading. :rolleyes:

... In the meantime back to /dev/null with ya.
 
? If the the Republican Party was the only "mainstream political party in the world" to insist that the law of gravity was real would that mean that gravity no longer exists?




Here is my bet. If the republicans told YOU that gravity wasn't real, you would believe it.

Is that true or not? Let's see YOU prove gravity exists.

Your Momma held you upside down and dropped you. You fell on your head and suffered permanent mental damage.

Gravity exists.
 
that same military sacrificed and lost many men and women along with their families suffering, so you can have the right to put them down. and the one THING this federal Government is in charge of: is the PROTECTION of the people they represent here at home and abroad. now I know some of you might not know that. Globull warming IS NOT in their handbook as one of their JOBS

You are too stupid to be one person. Your default position is always that something is not in the Constitution, even when it is. Providing for the "general welfare" means helping to prevent something which goes against the general welfare as well.

The Pentagon has all sorts of plans in place to deal with global warming. They've done more work on the subject that any other US government agency.

I know that frosts your cookies. How horrible of Obama to give a shit about you when you can't stand him.
 

Forum List

Back
Top