- Dec 18, 2011
- 12,919
- 4,823
- 350
Obama thinks we could absorb another terrorist attack. Dead Americans are such a small price to pay for his plan to bring as many Muslims here as possible. Christian refugees aren't being helped the way Muslim refugees are. He ignored the slaughter of Christians at the hands of radical Muslims, but now that some Muslims are wanting help, he's on it. He discriminates against the Christians being tortured and killed by Muslims, yet doesn't care that ISIS members are hiding among the Muslim refugees. All footage of refugees across the globe prove that the majority are young Muslim males, yet the left insists that the photos lie. And countries that have taken in large numbers of refugees are seeing a total disruption in communities as too many refugees refuse to assimilate and are just plain ugly in many cases. Women are in more danger of being attacked, there are riots in the streets and the refugees are bold in their demands. Not seeing the appreciation for all the trouble of caring for them. They've bitched about the food, about the process taking too long, about the housing and some complained that cigarettes were not supplied.
Sorry, but the Muslims are much harder to get along with than the Christians, at least with the ones from Syria. While some refugees might be peaceful, they don't speak out or attempt to assimilate. What is with so many that they insist on setting up their own territory and even expect others to change for them? Some need their asses kicked, particularly when they oppose women dressing less conservatively than their own women, which virtually all non-Muslims do. So many warnings are issued to the local citizens to alter their behavior so as not to offend or rile the Muslim men.
The majority of people in this country are against accepting refugees that cannot be vetted. Obama is unconcerned about potential terrorist attacks as a result of his plan. He owns this 100% and when an attack occurs or when refugees disrupt communities in a very bad way, Obama must answer for it. We have more homeless of our own that we can handle and while they remain in the streets, unknown refugees will enjoy all the comforts that borrowed money from China can afford.
"Obasma’s occasional profession of fondness for the rule of law is hardly consistent, particularly since the Syrian refugees became a thing. He insists federal law must be followed regarding refugee resettlement, but hypocritically refuses to crack down on states with unlawful sanctuary cities.
For Thanksgiving, Obama compared the mostly male Syrian invaders of Europe to America’s pilgrim settlers— nice insulting touch for the holiday!
In response, more than half of the states’ governors have rejected Syrian refugees for their jurisdictions.
The Presidential decree to resettle Syrian Muslims (who cannot be screened because no database) is unpopular: a Rasmussen poll published November 19 found 60 percent of likely voters oppose the settling of Syrian refugees in the state where they live. An October Rasmussen survey (before the Paris jihad attacks) showed 56 percent of likely voters thought giving thousands of Syrians asylum will make America a more dangerous place.
On Saturday, Tucker Carlson discussed the Syrian refugee mess with J. Christian Adams, a former Justice Department official. Adams thinks the Syrians will be dependable Democrat voters in the future, so any danger of mass jihad murder is a non-concern to the President in comparison. (Interestingly, Obama remarked to reporter Bob Woodward a few years back that America could "absorb" another terror attack. Is that any way for the nation’s commander in chief to think?)"
http://www.vdare.com/posts/obamas-fundamental-transformation-of-america-the-syrian-scheme
Sorry, but the Muslims are much harder to get along with than the Christians, at least with the ones from Syria. While some refugees might be peaceful, they don't speak out or attempt to assimilate. What is with so many that they insist on setting up their own territory and even expect others to change for them? Some need their asses kicked, particularly when they oppose women dressing less conservatively than their own women, which virtually all non-Muslims do. So many warnings are issued to the local citizens to alter their behavior so as not to offend or rile the Muslim men.
The majority of people in this country are against accepting refugees that cannot be vetted. Obama is unconcerned about potential terrorist attacks as a result of his plan. He owns this 100% and when an attack occurs or when refugees disrupt communities in a very bad way, Obama must answer for it. We have more homeless of our own that we can handle and while they remain in the streets, unknown refugees will enjoy all the comforts that borrowed money from China can afford.
"Obasma’s occasional profession of fondness for the rule of law is hardly consistent, particularly since the Syrian refugees became a thing. He insists federal law must be followed regarding refugee resettlement, but hypocritically refuses to crack down on states with unlawful sanctuary cities.
For Thanksgiving, Obama compared the mostly male Syrian invaders of Europe to America’s pilgrim settlers— nice insulting touch for the holiday!
In response, more than half of the states’ governors have rejected Syrian refugees for their jurisdictions.
The Presidential decree to resettle Syrian Muslims (who cannot be screened because no database) is unpopular: a Rasmussen poll published November 19 found 60 percent of likely voters oppose the settling of Syrian refugees in the state where they live. An October Rasmussen survey (before the Paris jihad attacks) showed 56 percent of likely voters thought giving thousands of Syrians asylum will make America a more dangerous place.
On Saturday, Tucker Carlson discussed the Syrian refugee mess with J. Christian Adams, a former Justice Department official. Adams thinks the Syrians will be dependable Democrat voters in the future, so any danger of mass jihad murder is a non-concern to the President in comparison. (Interestingly, Obama remarked to reporter Bob Woodward a few years back that America could "absorb" another terror attack. Is that any way for the nation’s commander in chief to think?)"
http://www.vdare.com/posts/obamas-fundamental-transformation-of-america-the-syrian-scheme
