The USSC is has agreed to no such thing. In fact, it has thrown out at least three "lawsuits" already unworthy of its agenda, which should tell you something. But nooooooooo...
MaggieMae, is Gstarz a disciple of Alinki? What a slime ball of projection.
Let's see:
Rule 1: Power is not only what you have, but what an opponent thinks you have.
If your organization is small, hide your numbers in the dark and raise a din that will make everyone think you have many more people than you do.
Yup.
Rule 2: Never go outside the experience of your people.
The result is confusion, fear, and retreat.
Only if it's working. In his case, it isn't.
Rule 3: Whenever possible, go outside the experience of an opponent. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.
Some are good at that, some lousy at it. The good ones have the ideology right (correct) but fail the reality test. The lousy ones quote bloggers who claim to have experience, but don't.
Rule 4: Make opponents live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.
He (they) still don't have this one down pat, yet. 
Rule 5: Ridicule is mans most potent weapon. Its hard to counterattack ridicule, and it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.
This only works when one is correct, and then adds emphasis with ridicule. Ridiculing just to bully is childish.
Rule 6: A good tactic is one your people enjoy. If your people arent having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.
I don't think GStarz is having fun. He wasn't expecting such a smackdown.
Rule 7: A tactic that drags on for too long becomes a drag. Commitment may become ritualistic as people turn to other issues.
GStarz fails miserably here.
Rule 8: Keep the pressure on. Use different tactics and actions and use all events of the period for your purpose. The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this that will cause the opposition to react to your advantage.
The RWNM en mass are experts at this. Individually, not so much. They fail miserably.
Rule 9: The threat is more terrifying than the thing itself. When Alinsky leaked word that large numbers of poor people were going to tie up the washrooms of OHare Airport, Chicago city authorities quickly agreed to act on a longstanding commitment to a ghetto organization. They imagined the mayhem as thousands of passengers poured off airplanes to discover every washroom occupied. Then they imagined the international embarrassment and the damage to the citys reputation.
Probably the favorite of the right. From invading Iraq which maybe was a threat someday, right up to Glenn Beck's conspiracy threat that Islamofacists partnering with Communists will install a Caliphate in this country...soon.
Rule 10: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. Avoid being trapped by an opponent or an interviewer who says, Okay, what would you do?
Nope. They need more practice with that one. I ask that question on all sorts of issues confronting us, and they just scamper off.
Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Dont try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.
A tie with Rule 9. It's classic conservative propaganda.
Edit to add link:
Rules for Radicals
