Obamacare.... how many people are uninsured???

Dems created it. Ruining existing Healthcare that over 200 million had at that time.

Money funneled to BIG Insurance. Then back to Deep State Congress. Money Laundering 101.

Do we have enough patriotic honest Congress to clean it up?

Not a single word you've just said explains why Republicans who had full majorities are somehow absolved from responsibility for running our government.

Why lie and deflect like that? Obviously, Republicans had every opportunity to replace or fix Obamacare. They didn't, so take your empty partisan bitching and shove it you know where.

It's easy to point fingers, hard work to implement real and constructive systemic improvements.
 
Last edited:
Do we have enough patriotic honest Congress to clean it up?

No. Obamacare is the foot in the door that leads to gov't run healthcare, which is a sacred cow for the democrats. They cannot and will not back down on it. Once you give away free stuff, it's all but impossible to take it back and the democrats know that. They don't care what it costs or what the fiscal consequences will be.
 
No. Obamacare is the foot in the door that leads to gov't run healthcare

Nope!

Obamacare is fundamentally a private insurance market, which makes it easy for consumers to compare and shop for insurance and to receive means tested subsidies from gov.

Scraping that will (again!) make quality health insurance out of reach for tens of millions of people and ensure that Democrats will eventually pass Medicare-for-all-plan that will run most private insurance out of business.
 
Last edited:
Unless you're heavily invested in insurance stocks, our goal shouldn't be to maximize insurance coverage. Our goal should be to restore market sanity to health care, so that we only need insurance for catastrophes. Trying to finance regular health care needs with insurance is stupid. It's the primary cause of health care inflation.
 
Last edited:
Unless you're heavily invested in insurance stocks, our goal shouldn't be to maximize insurance coverage. Our goal should be to restore market sanity to health care, so that we only need insurance for catastrophes. Trying to finance regular health care needs with insurance is stupid.

Again having tens more millions of uninsured people is "sanity"?

Again having people unable to get affordable insurance due to pre-existing conditions is "sanity"?

Again having people be denied healthcare coverage and having to go bankrupt due to small print in wild-west insurance contracts is "sanity"?

You Republicans better tread lightly with all that Obamacare rhetoric, you just might catch the disaster you are chasing.
 
Again having tens more millions of uninsured people is "sanity"?
I didn't say that.
Again having people unable to get affordable insurance due to pre-existing conditions is "sanity"?
I didn't say that either.
Again having people be denied healthcare coverage and having to go bankrupt due to small print in wild-west insurance contracts is "sanity"?
Nor that. Three for three.
You Republicans better tread lightly with all that Obamacare rhetoric, you just might catch the disaster you are chasing.
And ... I'm not a Republican.

Get back to me if you want to talk about what I DID say.
 
Last edited:
Dems created it. Ruining existing Healthcare that over 200 million had at that time.

Money funneled to BIG Insurance. Then back to Deep State Congress. Money Laundering 101.

Do we have enough patriotic honest Congress to clean it up?
That's your dear leader and his incompetent regime.
A RWNJ Congress............Clean up?

LOL.


 
I didn't say that.

I didn't say that either.

Nor that. Three for three.

And ... I'm not a Republican.

Get back to me if you want to talk about what I DID say.

Of course you've said it implicitly when you said we should GO BACK to pre-Obamacare.

Those ARE the implications of what you are saying, you just don't seem to get that.
 
Of course you've said it implicitly when you said we should GO BACK to pre-Obamacare.
No, I haven't. But that's the usual liberal conceit: if anyone rejects their pet solution to a problem, they're actually lobbying to perpetuate the problem! They like to pretend that their solution is the only solution. :rolleyes: Most especially when it's a bad solution.
Those ARE the implications of what you are saying, you just don't seem to get that.
No, they're not. I still don't think you grasp what I'm saying, but you're clearly not interested in honest discussion of the matter.
 
Back
Top Bottom