"Obama worst Pres" Poll is Retarded...

[Luddly Neddite]

Its not as though any poll will change anyone's mind about any politician.

And, this one certainly isn't' gonna change President Obama's political career.

Considering he's had half of congress working hard to destroy country, he's accomplished some pretty amazing things. Bush couldn't create jobs, Obama has created jobs every single month. And, the stock market does better and better every month.

Meanwhile, not one Republican does anything at all, except try to kill off the country.

Sadly, that's what RWs want as well.

 

[blackhawk]

Yeah these polls always suck when your guy is on top in them if Bush was first and Obama second in the poll the left would love it.

 

[1776]

Look at the "Ind" number and maybe you can figure it out.

You get the same result...left leaning independents divided...right leaning independents (tea partiers) swarm the same two targets.

Poll of those that don't know US history from ham & cheese. Most probably skipped that class in high school, if they made it TO high school.

 

[AmericanFirst]

Truth hurts. Coming up with unsubstantiated numbers is always hilarious.

 

[tinydancer]

Obviously this poll was just released to set off fusses and cause friction of some kind...but the method and wording of this poll is just plainly misleading. It's sad people are taking this so seriously.

First off people are saying a "majority" in the poll named Obama the worst president, no, it was only 33% that did, the poll and ad titles both state "plurality" not majority.

But more importantly...the results of the vote of both "best" and "worst" can be summed up by Republicans all swarming the same president for both "best" and "worst" (Reagan and Obama). Yes, that's pretty much it, except GW Bush getting second worst by the Democrats ganging up on him a bit.

Democrats in the poll largely split their vote for best between 3 different presidents (Clinton, Kennedy, Obama) and split the "worst" with Nixon and GW. Bush, with Bush getting the lion's share.

Here's the breakdown:

35. Thinking about the United States Presidents we have had since World War II: Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George Bush Senior, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama, which one would you consider the best president?


-----------------Total---Rep---Dem---Ind

John Kennedy-----15----6-----18-----17
Ronald Reagan----35-----66-----6-----36
Bill Clinton---------18----3-----34-----16
Barack Obama-----8-----4-----18-----2

Reagan got a huge surge from Republicans (big surprise...) while Democrats were more divided between Clinton, Kennedy, Obama, and a few others like LBJ.

36. Which of these twelve presidents we have had since World War II would you consider the worst president: Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, John Kennedy, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George Bush Senior, Bill Clinton, George W. Bush or Barack Obama?

--------------Tot----Rep----Dem----Ind

Richard Nixon-----13-----5-----20-----14
Jimmy Carter------8------14-----1-----9
George W. Bush--28-----5-----54-----23
Barack Obama----33-----63-----4-----36

Once again...Republicans all flock to Obama for worst, nearly as much as Reagan for best, and Democrats are divided between Nixon and GW Bush.

This poll does not hold anywhere near as much weight as one would think.

Source:
National (US) Poll - July 2, 2014 - Obama Is First As Worst Presid | Quinnipiac University Connecticut

I think you need to focus more on your indy vote. You are putting too much into dem and repub when it comes to who disapproves of Obama. Dems and Pubs are too partisan to put much faith in hoping they don't vote party lines IMO.

From your link:

59% of Indys disapproved of Obama right now. And 41% of indy''s voted Obama worse than Bush. 53% of indy's state he is not trustworthy. All the other votes in those categories' for indy's were spread thin over all the choices, except when it came to voting Obama as a bad president, worse than Bush and untrustworthy.

Bingo! Those indy numbers jump right out at you.

 

[Nyvin]

Obviously this poll was just released to set off fusses and cause friction of some kind...but the method and wording of this poll is just plainly misleading. It's sad people are taking this so seriously.

First off people are saying a "majority" in the poll named Obama the worst president, no, it was only 33% that did, the poll and ad titles both state "plurality" not majority.

But more importantly...the results of the vote of both "best" and "worst" can be summed up by Republicans all swarming the same president for both "best" and "worst" (Reagan and Obama). Yes, that's pretty much it, except GW Bush getting second worst by the Democrats ganging up on him a bit.

Democrats in the poll largely split their vote for best between 3 different presidents (Clinton, Kennedy, Obama) and split the "worst" with Nixon and GW. Bush, with Bush getting the lion's share.

Here's the breakdown:



Reagan got a huge surge from Republicans (big surprise...) while Democrats were more divided between Clinton, Kennedy, Obama, and a few others like LBJ.



Once again...Republicans all flock to Obama for worst, nearly as much as Reagan for best, and Democrats are divided between Nixon and GW Bush.

This poll does not hold anywhere near as much weight as one would think.

Source:
National (US) Poll - July 2, 2014 - Obama Is First As Worst Presid | Quinnipiac University Connecticut

I think you need to focus more on your indy vote. You are putting too much into dem and repub when it comes to who disapproves of Obama. Dems and Pubs are too partisan to put much faith in hoping they don't vote party lines IMO.

From your link:

59% of Indys disapproved of Obama right now. And 41% of indy''s voted Obama worse than Bush. 53% of indy's state he is not trustworthy. All the other votes in those categories' for indy's were spread thin over all the choices, except when it came to voting Obama as a bad president, worse than Bush and untrustworthy.

Bingo! Those indy numbers jump right out at you.

Obama's "best" number is low with independents but other then that it lines up exactly the same...

Split between Clinton and Kennedy for best: 16 - 17, Reagan got 36

Split between GW Bush and Nixon for worst: 14 - 23, Obama got 36

Right leaning independents herd together for the same targets, left leaning independents are divided. It's the same concept.

 

[skookerasbil]

One has to laugh......when the polls look great for their guy, the far left is falling all over themselves to post it up in here. I remember back in 2008 and 2008......these people were drunk with glee.

But the shine is long gone ( think back at that first inauguration........now viewed as a fraud ). And of course, the far left will be calling all polls "retarded"!!!



People on the far left live in a perpetual state of angst and misery......and now HOLY MOTHER OF GOD.......they all look like 's for having supported this goofball.

 

[chesswarsnow]

Sorry bout that,


1. Obama sucks the *BIG ONE*.
2. Worst American too!
3. Why and how he is still in office is ******* scary as hell!
4. God help us we need some relief.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas