Obama wanted to start a war with Iran to get re-elected.

We just publicly killed the #2 man in Iran. They HAVE to respond.

Wonderful.

And why?

Impeachment
Then we get to wipe out their entire nuclear manufacturing capacity....

Pity...


.


And that's exactly why they'll have to use their brains for a change.

They know if they go too far and give the US the excuse to take that stuff out it's going to be a crater festival- and they do not want to lose that bargaining chip they've been working their busy little selves on...
It is a game of chicken. Who will blink first.
I do not see the Iranians as rational so we can expect anything.
 
Dimms are just looking for political points and their lack of support is disgusting.

They don’t have American interests at heart. They just want money and power.

Shameful
I am not a Democrat but I do not like Trump. Most Americans want the best to happen despite concerns. Some have voiced their concerns.
Do not just criticize those with concerns.
To counter the concerns, as a Trump supporter, tell us what the possible positive results could be. Please provide the long term positive strategy of taking out Qasem Soleimani.
A stupid and dishonest question. You already know what the long terms positive effects of killing Solemani are and whatever the answer to yoru question is, you will attack it in order to attack the President.
Try me. Give me the positive actions you feel will happen. I may not agree with you but I will just listen. I feel no one knows what will happen. We are dealing with a desperate, irrational regime.
 
We just publicly killed the #2 man in Iran. They HAVE to respond.

Wonderful.

And why?

Impeachment
Then we get to wipe out their entire nuclear manufacturing capacity....

Pity...


.


And that's exactly why they'll have to use their brains for a change.

They know if they go too far and give the US the excuse to take that stuff out it's going to be a crater festival- and they do not want to lose that bargaining chip they've been working their busy little selves on...
It is a game of chicken. Who will blink first.
I do not see the Iranians as rational so we can expect anything.
They are rational but unrealistic, so they reach their conclusions based on unrealistic expectations. As they find themselves increasingly humiliated by US retaliations they cannot hope to match, they will learn to adjust their expectations.
 
We just publicly killed the #2 man in Iran. They HAVE to respond.

Wonderful.

And why?

Impeachment
Then we get to wipe out their entire nuclear manufacturing capacity....

Pity...


.


And that's exactly why they'll have to use their brains for a change.

They know if they go too far and give the US the excuse to take that stuff out it's going to be a crater festival- and they do not want to lose that bargaining chip they've been working their busy little selves on...
It is a game of chicken. Who will blink first.
I do not see the Iranians as rational so we can expect anything.

They'll want to protect the nuke program, IMO.

Their real problem is that Trump just changed the rules.

Their typical game of proxy attacks and denial of involvement just got tossed right into the crapper.

So, they have a problem, as they have to do something, but their normal game likely gets them slapped hard again and an open attack is likely worse for them.

They don't want an open war, as they know the west is slobbering to take out that nuclear program, and that is the most important thing to them at this point, IMO.

We'll see. Decisions, decisions.....
 
We just publicly killed the #2 man in Iran. They HAVE to respond.

Wonderful.

And why?

Impeachment
Then we get to wipe out their entire nuclear manufacturing capacity....

Pity...


.


And that's exactly why they'll have to use their brains for a change.

They know if they go too far and give the US the excuse to take that stuff out it's going to be a crater festival- and they do not want to lose that bargaining chip they've been working their busy little selves on...
It is a game of chicken. Who will blink first.
I do not see the Iranians as rational so we can expect anything.
They are rational but unrealistic, so they reach their conclusions based on unrealistic expectations. As they find themselves increasingly humiliated by US retaliations they cannot hope to match, they will learn to adjust their expectations.
There are several positive impacts his execution will have. He has been the mastermind of the Quds force for twenty years and has built it alliances and proxy on the basis on personal contacts over the years, so his absence will be a significant disruption to Iran's imperialist adventures. It tells he leadership, including the supreme leader, that no one who attacks Americans or American property is safe anywhere. It tells them that any retaliation against the US such as the embassy attack will lead to even worse US attacks than they were responding to. It will make the Iranian leadership appear less formidable and more vulnerable to their enemies in Iran and Iraq. Basically, it exposes the iranian leadership as bullshiters who are much less fierce and much less capable than the want others to think.
 
We just publicly killed the #2 man in Iran. They HAVE to respond.

Wonderful.

And why?

Impeachment
Then we get to wipe out their entire nuclear manufacturing capacity....

Pity...


.


And that's exactly why they'll have to use their brains for a change.

They know if they go too far and give the US the excuse to take that stuff out it's going to be a crater festival- and they do not want to lose that bargaining chip they've been working their busy little selves on...
It is a game of chicken. Who will blink first.
I do not see the Iranians as rational so we can expect anything.
They are rational but unrealistic, so they reach their conclusions based on unrealistic expectations. As they find themselves increasingly humiliated by US retaliations they cannot hope to match, they will learn to adjust their expectations.
There are several positive impacts his execution will have. He has been the mastermind of the Quds force for twenty years and has built it alliances and proxy on the basis on personal contacts over the years, so his absence will be a significant disruption to Iran's imperialist adventures. It tells he leadership, including the supreme leader, that no one who attacks Americans or American property is safe anywhere. It tells them that any retaliation against the US such as the embassy attack will lead to even worse US attacks than they were responding to. It will make the Iranian leadership appear less formidable and more vulnerable to their enemies in Iran and Iraq. Basically, it exposes the iranian leadership as bullshiters who are much less fierce and much less capable than the want others to think.
I feel what you say is possible and I hope it happens.
 
Dimms are just looking for political points and their lack of support is disgusting.

They don’t have American interests at heart. They just want money and power.

Shameful
I am not a Democrat but I do not like Trump. Most Americans want the best to happen despite concerns. Some have voiced their concerns.
Do not just criticize those with concerns.
To counter the concerns, as a Trump supporter, tell us what the possible positive results could be. Please provide the long term positive strategy of taking out Qasem Soleimani.

Disposing of a terrorist that has murdered hundreds of Americans see,s like a good idea to me.

Chamberlain didn’t want to start a war. How did that turn out.

Did you ever ask what the end game was from any Obama drone strikes?

What about going into Pakistan to kill Bin Ladin? Pakistan has the bomb. What was the long term strategy of taking out a old diabetic porn freak living in a basement?
 




No Tramp just did, to get re-elected. Who is the negotiator, Tis Obama, not tramp.


Hillary Clinton told a group of Wall Street Investors that she was willing to go to
War with Iran and Russia to remove Assad, and told them, Consider War with Iran, and “Investment”.
 



Don’t you have a goat costume to put on for your wedding night as an ISIS Bride?
upload_2020-1-3_21-25-29.jpeg
 
LOL... That meat puppet faggot bolshevik wanted to start a civil war to collapse the US.
Yes, I believe tRump does.

Surprised you noticed though, you aren't usually that quick on the uptake.

No offense.
 
It was not that long ago when the very same people were pissed off at Trump for not using a military response to Iran attacking oil tankers.
 
Shouldn’t you get busy licking Ayatollah Assaholla?

Don’t you have to go suck the cock of your dead daddy al Baghdadi?

LOL... That meat puppet faggot bolshevik wanted to start a civil war to collapse the US.
Yes, I believe tRump does.

Surprised you noticed though, you aren't usually that quick on the uptake.

No offense.
What is up with leaping to Pete's defense?

Is he your "special friend"?
 
Shouldn’t you get busy licking Ayatollah Assaholla?

Don’t you have to go suck the cock of your dead daddy al Baghdadi?

LOL... That meat puppet faggot bolshevik wanted to start a civil war to collapse the US.
Yes, I believe tRump does.

Surprised you noticed though, you aren't usually that quick on the uptake.

No offense.
What is up with leaping to Pete's defense?

Is he your "special friend"?
Not sure where you're going with that. I'm not really a fan of most middle eastern lleaders.
 
Sure you are. They are your friends and you love them and defend them.
Shouldn’t you get busy licking Ayatollah Assaholla?

Don’t you have to go suck the cock of your dead daddy al Baghdadi?

LOL... That meat puppet faggot bolshevik wanted to start a civil war to collapse the US.
Yes, I believe tRump does.

Surprised you noticed though, you aren't usually that quick on the uptake.

No offense.
What is up with leaping to Pete's defense?

Is he your "special friend"?
Not sure where you're going with that. I'm not really a fan of most middle eastern lleaders.
 
When did lefties start this anti war stance?

I didn’t hear it when HIllary and Obama went to war.

Do you guys have a clear international strategy other than anything Trump does is bad?

So pathetic and transparent.
 
They are scum, and liars. They were attacking Trump every day for wanting to bring our troops home. They bowed down and sucked Obama’s dick for blowing up a US Citizen with a drone, with no trial, no warrant and no notification of Congress, but spit on Trump for killing a terrorist who killed near a thousand Americans and countless other innocent people.

When did lefties start this anti war stance?

I didn’t hear it when HIllary and Obama went to war.

Do you guys have a clear international strategy other than anything Trump does is bad?

So pathetic and transparent.
 
They are scum, and liars. They were attacking Trump every day for wanting to bring our troops home. They bowed down and sucked Obama’s dick for blowing up a US Citizen with a drone, with no trial, no warrant and no notification of Congress, but spit on Trump for killing a terrorist who killed near a thousand Americans and countless other innocent people.

When did lefties start this anti war stance?

I didn’t hear it when HIllary and Obama went to war.

Do you guys have a clear international strategy other than anything Trump does is bad?

So pathetic and transparent.

They just want the White House so they can continue to fleece the American public for their own money and power.

That’s all governance is to them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top