Obama vs GOP candidate(s) a statistical dead even tie.

[RetiredGySgt]

Two comments:

Are you better of today than you were 4 years ago?

Had enough?

there's another question....

who's the party that's screwing up everything?

oh yeah...

as for the deceptive poll in the o/p...

great... until you insert a real person into the generic repub catagory...

RealClearPolitics - President Obama vs. Republican Candidates

and then the only one who comes close is romney.

but nice try.

Lets recap shall we? You claimed that 51 Republican Senators under Bush CONTROLLED the Senate. For 2 years under Obama the dems had at first 60 then 59, yet YOU claim the Dems did not control the Senate. Explain.

 

[Oddball]

For example... go look at how the Democrats in congress cooperated with Reagan during HIS first term.

You mean like the "cooperation" they exhibited when it came time for the spending cuts that they promised, in exchange for the tax cuts?

Oh yeah, that's right.....

 

[Meister]

For example... go look at how the Democrats in congress cooperated with Reagan during HIS first term.

You mean like the "cooperation" they exhibited when it came time for the spending cuts that they promised, in exchange for the tax cuts?

Oh yeah, that's right.....

Yeah....I forgot about that one.

 

[Jroc]

Two comments:

Are you better of today than you were 4 years ago?

Had enough?

there's another question....

who's the party that's screwing up everything?

oh yeah...

as for the deceptive poll in the o/p...

great... until you insert a real person into the generic repub catagory...

RealClearPolitics - President Obama vs. Republican Candidates

and then the only one who comes close is romney.

but nice try.

Wow just think what Obama might have been able to accomplish if not for the Republican control of the House for less than one year

 

[LoneLaugher]

Fixing? Like taking our country down a social rabbit trail? Is that the kind of fixing your talking about?

the fact remains, Obama has not had an opportunity to implement the policies he was elected on because of the obstructionist actions of the republicans in congress. One will never know how much fixing he could have accomplished if he had had even a modicum of cooperation from the GOP.

For example... go look at how the Democrats in congress cooperated with Reagan during HIS first term.

Obama made his own bed...remember, he didn't need the republicans (and stated as much) when he had the Senate and Congress. ( "republicans are the enemy". the republicans need to get in the back of the bus") So don't tell me about the republicans not reaching across the isle. He has been as devisive of a president that I have ever seen in my lifetime.

You want that to be the case.....but it isn't.

 

[Meister]

the fact remains, Obama has not had an opportunity to implement the policies he was elected on because of the obstructionist actions of the republicans in congress. One will never know how much fixing he could have accomplished if he had had even a modicum of cooperation from the GOP.

For example... go look at how the Democrats in congress cooperated with Reagan during HIS first term.

Obama made his own bed...remember, he didn't need the republicans (and stated as much) when he had the Senate and Congress. ( "republicans are the enemy". the republicans need to get in the back of the bus") So don't tell me about the republicans not reaching across the isle. He has been as devisive of a president that I have ever seen in my lifetime.

You want that to be the case.....but it isn't.

You saying it doesn't, makes it so?
Thanks for the laugh, laugher

 

[LoneLaugher]

Obama made his own bed...remember, he didn't need the republicans (and stated as much) when he had the Senate and Congress. ( "republicans are the enemy". the republicans need to get in the back of the bus") So don't tell me about the republicans not reaching across the isle. He has been as devisive of a president that I have ever seen in my lifetime.

You want that to be the case.....but it isn't.

You saying it doesn't, makes it so?
Thanks for the laugh, laugher

No problem. You can't support your claim that Obama is divisive. All you have is a comment or two.......completely without the context with which they were made.

He has been so much the opposite, that your masters have had to make up an entire narrative regarding his "divisivemess" for you to follow.

Trying to change the political climate generated by Reagan, Rove and the "neocons" is no easy task. But our Commander In Chief is giving it his all.

 

[Meister]

You want that to be the case.....but it isn't.

You saying it doesn't, makes it so?
Thanks for the laugh, laugher

No problem. You can't support your claim that Obama is divisive. All you have is a comment or two.......completely without the context with which they were made.

He has been so much the opposite, that your masters have had to make up an entire narrative regarding his "divisivemess" for you to follow.

Trying to change the political climate generated by Reagan, Rove and the "neocons" is no easy task. But our Commander In Chief is giving it his all.

oh brother,
Apparently, you've had your head in the sand the last 3 years. I can't fix stupidity.
You speak of the right's masters, but what about your messiah? hmmmm?

 

[LoneLaugher]

You saying it doesn't, makes it so?
Thanks for the laugh, laugher

No problem. You can't support your claim that Obama is divisive. All you have is a comment or two.......completely without the context with which they were made.

He has been so much the opposite, that your masters have had to make up an entire narrative regarding his "divisivemess" for you to follow.

Trying to change the political climate generated by Reagan, Rove and the "neocons" is no easy task. But our Commander In Chief is giving it his all.

oh brother,
Apparently, you've had your head in the sand the last 3 years. I can't fix stupidity.
You speak of the right's masters, but what about your messiah? hmmmm?

Well.....THAT settles it. You bringing up the "messiah" term in a discussion with a person who denies the existence of any higher power is a perfect kaboose to an entirely baseless train of thought.

You know that the "messiah" bullshit is another example of an entirely made up narrative. Your talking heads float it....... say it a few times.......you and the other dummies repeat it.....and without a single Obama supporter EVER referring to the man as a "messiah" you have your talking point. The false perception has become your reality.

Do you feel used? You should.

 

[Meister]

No problem. You can't support your claim that Obama is divisive. All you have is a comment or two.......completely without the context with which they were made.

He has been so much the opposite, that your masters have had to make up an entire narrative regarding his "divisivemess" for you to follow.

Trying to change the political climate generated by Reagan, Rove and the "neocons" is no easy task. But our Commander In Chief is giving it his all.

oh brother,
Apparently, you've had your head in the sand the last 3 years. I can't fix stupidity.
You speak of the right's masters, but what about your messiah? hmmmm?

Well.....THAT settles it. You bringing up the "messiah" term in a discussion with a person who denies the existence of any higher power is a perfect kaboose to an entirely baseless train of thought.

You know that the "messiah" bullshit is another example of an entirely made up narrative. Your talking heads float it....... say it a few times.......you and the other dummies repeat it.....and without a single Obama supporter EVER referring to the man as a "messiah" you have your talking point. The false perception has become your reality.

Do you feel used? You should.

I don't feel used at all. I use the term messiah, (not Messiah). You can't even admit that your messiah isn't devisive, and for that I laugh at you, laugher. Now, just get the sand out of your eyes and see the world as most do.

 

[LoneLaugher]

I already do. Witness next November.

 

[Mr.Nick]

Boy, these RCP averaging polls have been dead on so far. President Obama shows up as a STRONGLY supported president despite his economic/financial bungles/scandals & reneging on campaign promises...

RealClearPolitics - Election 2012 - President Obama vs. Republican Candidate

Incredibly, president Obama has GAINED a point more over primary leader Mitt Romney in the last week, increasing president Obama's lead over Mitt from +1.5 to +2.5 but that's still within the margin of error... like this one is CLOSE. The problem is that Mitt can't just match president Obama... for Mitt has to beat him out to take the title. Mitt's problem is his staggering record of flip flops which are so numerous that web sites have popped up dedicated to just Mitt's flip flopping...

Mitt Romney Flip-Flops

...like nobody knows which Mitt Romney their really getting.
The only other viable primary candidate(Gingrich is having serious problems now) is Ron Paul, at least at current. Ron's a strong contender with a record & word 2nd to none with a 101% proven Constitutional voting record. His non interventionist policy, small government agenda, maximum individual liberties platform, balanced budget & sound value based currency has made Ron an overnight sensation with the constituency, ESPECIALLY the under 35 age group who see nothing in their future but debt. Ron's problem is his staggering age. People I talk to often favor his agenda/platform but wonder if Ron will be pushing daisies before his 1st term is up. I mean it's of such a concern that folks want to know who his VP will be before they will support Ron!
Despite president Obama's pro war mentality, world cop/nation building agenda, record debt spending & grow government attitude, he looks to be in the white house to me for another five more years. He's +2.5 OVER Romney at current & +7.7 over Ron Paul as I type...

RealClearPolitics - President Obama vs. Republican Candidates

...with all other primary contestants not even close. The majority of Americans say they want an end to the endless wars & debt spending, but see a hawk like president Obama as the way to go, like go figure!

Ron Paul would destroy Obama...

I know some Blue Dogs that cant wait to nominate Paul, and that is telling to me.

Here in Illinois Democrats can vote in the republican primary, and I believe many democrats that put their faith into Obamafuck last time around will certainly favor Paul - at least if they're real liberals and not progressives...

Then Newt and Perry failed in Virginia...... Since those two dummies are off the ballot I wonder who their supporters will vote for??

 

[expatriate]

Wow just think what Obama might have been able to accomplish if not for the Republican control of the House for less than one year

ever watch schoolhouse rock on how a bill becomes a law? apparently not. Without 60 solid supporting votes in the senate, Obama can get nothing done, and he never had that. (DINOs don't count)

 

[kwc57]

Are you better of today than you were 4 years ago?

Me thinks that will be shelved once the real campaign kicks off because it just opens up the door for Obama to remind the country of the meltdown of 2008.

"Four years ago this country was falling apart. GDP was plummeting and we were bleeding a half a million jobs a month. Nobody knew where the bottom was. Americans were scared. Today the economy has stabilized and is growing. Unemployment is shrinking, etc."

You mean the one he has expanded on multi-fold? If he has to run on his record, he's dead.

 

[Article 15]

Are you better of today than you were 4 years ago?

Me thinks that will be shelved once the real campaign kicks off because it just opens up the door for Obama to remind the country of the meltdown of 2008.

"Four years ago this country was falling apart. GDP was plummeting and we were bleeding a half a million jobs a month. Nobody knew where the bottom was. Americans were scared. Today the economy has stabilized and is growing. Unemployment is shrinking, etc."

You mean the one he has expanded on multi-fold? If he has to run on his record, he's dead.

No, the one that he turned around.

He's going to run on his record.

And he's going to win.

 

[kwc57]

he ran on TRYING to fix those things... and he would have, if the republicans in the senate and the house would have done ANYTHING other than stand in his way every single time he tried to fix anything.

Fixing? Like taking our country down a social rabbit trail? Is that the kind of fixing your talking about?

the fact remains, Obama has not had an opportunity to implement the policies he was elected on because of the obstructionist actions of the republicans in congress. One will never know how much fixing he could have accomplished if he had had even a modicum of cooperation from the GOP.

For example... go look at how the Democrats in congress cooperated with Reagan during HIS first term.

oh, boo freaking hoo! Hasn't had the opportunity. Are we serving milk and cookies after nap time in DC? It's called leadership......of which Obama is totally devoid. How can a guy so indecisive that he votes present instead of yes or no ever be a leader?

 

[kwc57]

Me thinks that will be shelved once the real campaign kicks off because it just opens up the door for Obama to remind the country of the meltdown of 2008.

"Four years ago this country was falling apart. GDP was plummeting and we were bleeding a half a million jobs a month. Nobody knew where the bottom was. Americans were scared. Today the economy has stabilized and is growing. Unemployment is shrinking, etc."

You mean the one he has expanded on multi-fold? If he has to run on his record, he's dead.

No, the one that he turned around.

He's going to run on his record.

And he's going to win.

We'll see. If the government was a non-union business, he'd have been fired long ago.

 

[007]

Two comments:

Are you better of today than you were 4 years ago?

Had enough?

there's another question....

who's the party that's screwing up everything?

oh yeah...

as for the deceptive poll in the o/p...

great... until you insert a real person into the generic repub catagory...

RealClearPolitics - President Obama vs. Republican Candidates

and then the only one who comes close is romney.

but nice try.

The party screwing everything is democratic. Gun running, drug smuggling and murder are just what we are able to see, what else lies within the bowels of the lowlife.

Well how about fraud, forgery, stolen SSN's, illegally holding the office of POTUS, hiding everything that might shed light on who and what obama/soetoro is, suing states that are trying to do what the FEDS won't, spending us into all but imminent financial oblivion, appointing radical, liberal, activist judges to the Supreme Court, enacting a unconstitutional mandate forcing people to purchase something, and creating more new government agencies and regulations than any other administration in history just for starters.

The most startling fact in this presidential cycle is, that there are still MORONS STUPID enough to STILL BE SUPPORTING this RADICAL, SOCIALIST, BLACK THEOLOGIST, RACIST, MARXIST PIECE OF DOG SHIT FRAUD Barry Soetoro. These people must have BIRD SHIT for brains. How could anyone be so utterly fucking RETARDED?

 

[kwc57]

For example... go look at how the Democrats in congress cooperated with Reagan during HIS first term.

You mean like the "cooperation" they exhibited when it came time for the spending cuts that they promised, in exchange for the tax cuts?

Oh yeah, that's right.....

Like the cooperation they exhibited when it came time for closing the border in exchange for giving amnesty to illegal aliens? How can you tell a democrat is lying?

 

[The Rabbi]

Me thinks that will be shelved once the real campaign kicks off because it just opens up the door for Obama to remind the country of the meltdown of 2008.

"Four years ago this country was falling apart. GDP was plummeting and we were bleeding a half a million jobs a month. Nobody knew where the bottom was. Americans were scared. Today the economy has stabilized and is growing. Unemployment is shrinking, etc."

You mean the one he has expanded on multi-fold? If he has to run on his record, he's dead.

No, the one that he turned around.

He's going to run on his record.

And he's going to win.

He's already not running on his record. Everything is "The GOP in Congress has failed...."
His record is:
First credit downgrade in history
Explosion of the debt (just requested an extra 1.4T in the debt ceiling)
Most unpopular new entitlement program in history (Obamacare)
Lost Iraq War
Lost Afghan War
Supported Chavez-dictator in Honduras
Most regulation in history
Unemployment over 8% his entire tenure
Lowest workforce participation
etc