Obama: Interpol Now Above The Law

[L.K.Eder]

international police force not bound by a national law. hmm. where is the problem?

there is international law. to which the international organization is bound.

the other way around is the perversion, having a national law that answers to no international law.

you americans are not special, maybe speshial.

 

[Oddball]

Uh-huh...A police force in America not bound by American law.

We already have federal police who've killed people and not been held to account.

Can hear it now..."Yeah, they broke down your door, ransacked the house, confiscated your teevee and stereo gear without a warrant, but they're Italian cops, so you're SOL".

 

[Yurt]

international police force not bound by a national law. hmm. where is the problem?

there is international law. to which the international organization is bound.

the other way around is the perversion, having a national law that answers to no international law.

you americans are not special, maybe speshial.

bizarre....so international police do not have to abide by american laws when operating this country....not FOIA requests etc....they are IMMUNE and this is ok with you?

why don't we just throw away the US constitution and all its laws and abide only by this nebulous international law you speak of

 

[L.K.Eder]

i now read the three exec. orders and the act in question. and parts of the interpol constitution. i should have done that before firing my cheap shots.

must find out the motivation for the amendments.

 

[Yurt]

i now read the three exec. orders and the act in question. and parts of the interpol constitution. i should have done that before firing my cheap shots.

must find out the motivation for the amendments.

so you're changing your earlier stance?

pretty bizarre executive order huh....

 

[L.K.Eder]

i now read the three exec. orders and the act in question. and parts of the interpol constitution. i should have done that before firing my cheap shots.

must find out the motivation for the amendments.

so you're changing your earlier stance?

pretty bizarre executive order huh....

i am taking a neutral stance right now. i am certainly not following the one world order pee stained bullshit. if bullshit can be pee stained, hm. i think it can, as seen in this thread, haha. and i am also still laughing at the sentiment i thought i detected, where american law should supersede international law via exemptions.

15 American Exceptionalism and International Human Rights - Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

 

[The Rabbi]

What a concept, AMericans should be governed by a constitution that our people have fought and died for and which every elected official has sworn to uphold.

 

[L.K.Eder]

i give up, the source hunt is kind of tiring. the blogosphere is in proto-meltdown mode and pollutes the search for a serious source, i don't feel like dumpster-diving no more.

apparently obama did this to extend immunity to bill ayers.


so far i go with the interpretation that a paper tiger grew some teeth, and some cannot accept that. probably, the same subset of americans who want to profit from interpol when interpol acts outside the US, want interpol to be a eunuch you can mock and kick around inside the US.

and it is certainly not like interpol is above the law. it is just not as dependent on US law in the US now as it was before.

happy kwanzaa

 

[Yurt]

i give up, the source hunt is kind of tiring. the blogosphere is in proto-meltdown mode and pollutes the search for a serious source, i don't feel like dumpster-diving no more.

apparently obama did this to extend immunity to bill ayers.


so far i go with the interpretation that a paper tiger grew some teeth, and some cannot accept that. probably, the same subset of americans who want to profit from interpol when interpol acts outside the US, want interpol to be a eunuch you can mock and kick around inside the US.

and it is certainly not like interpol is above the law. it is just not as dependent on US law in the US now as it was before.

happy kwanzaa

wrong, it enjoys full diplomatic immunity....amazing that a POLICE force needs full immunity....our own FBI doesn't enjoy their immunities but you have no problem with that becuase you are an obama apologist and must find some way to defend anything he does

 

[Yurt]

i now read the three exec. orders and the act in question. and parts of the interpol constitution. i should have done that before firing my cheap shots.

must find out the motivation for the amendments.

so you're changing your earlier stance?

pretty bizarre executive order huh....

i am taking a neutral stance right now. i am certainly not following the one world order pee stained bullshit. if bullshit can be pee stained, hm. i think it can, as seen in this thread, haha. and i am also still laughing at the sentiment i thought i detected, where american law should supersede international law via exemptions.
15 American Exceptionalism and International Human Rights - Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

you're shitting me....you think international law is ABOVE american law in our own land? that we should subjugate our constitution to FOREIGN laws?

 

[Modbert]

In the meantime, Americans who are carrying "too much" cash can have it confiscated, with no probable cause, under the phony pretext that they might be dealing drugs.

More chains you can believe in.

It's been that way long before Obama.

 

[L.K.Eder]

i give up, the source hunt is kind of tiring. the blogosphere is in proto-meltdown mode and pollutes the search for a serious source, i don't feel like dumpster-diving no more.

apparently obama did this to extend immunity to bill ayers.


so far i go with the interpretation that a paper tiger grew some teeth, and some cannot accept that. probably, the same subset of americans who want to profit from interpol when interpol acts outside the US, want interpol to be a eunuch you can mock and kick around inside the US.

and it is certainly not like interpol is above the law. it is just not as dependent on US law in the US now as it was before.

happy kwanzaa

wrong, it enjoys full diplomatic immunity....amazing that a POLICE force needs full immunity....our own FBI doesn't enjoy their immunities but you have no problem with that becuase you are an obama apologist and must find some way to defend anything he does

it is more like that: i have no problem with it because i don't live in the US, but i see the hypocrisy of the US all the time. they want to benefit from international organizations, but if they don't play their way, they will claim exemptions. then they will complain that the castrated international organizations are not as effective as they could be and therefore the exemptions are validated.

the only thing i totally agree, and why i am still on the fence regarding this immunity thing is this: amazing that a police force needs full immunity. this can't be a good thing.

we had this a decade ago with europol; it is a complicated issue. the law and order types should be ecstatic.

 

[L.K.Eder]

so you're changing your earlier stance?

pretty bizarre executive order huh....

i am taking a neutral stance right now. i am certainly not following the one world order pee stained bullshit. if bullshit can be pee stained, hm. i think it can, as seen in this thread, haha. and i am also still laughing at the sentiment i thought i detected, where american law should supersede international law via exemptions.
15 American Exceptionalism and International Human Rights - Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

you're shitting me....you think international law is ABOVE american law in our own land? that we should subjugate our constitution to FOREIGN laws?

if you don't like the cooperation, leave interpol. no-one forces you to stay in, right? you can't reap the benefits and not cooperate at the same time.

 

[The Rabbi]

i am taking a neutral stance right now. i am certainly not following the one world order pee stained bullshit. if bullshit can be pee stained, hm. i think it can, as seen in this thread, haha. and i am also still laughing at the sentiment i thought i detected, where american law should supersede international law via exemptions.
15 American Exceptionalism and International Human Rights - Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

you're shitting me....you think international law is ABOVE american law in our own land? that we should subjugate our constitution to FOREIGN laws?

if you don't like the cooperation, leave interpol. no-one forces you to stay in, right? you can't reap the benefits and not cooperate at the same time.

Why not? Interpol doesn't like it, they can leave. They can kiss my American ass while they're at it.
I don't care that the Euros have given up whatever rights they once had for socialism. That isn't my problem. My problem is to keep us from going too far down the Road to Serfdom. It is too late for the Euros.

 

[L.K.Eder]

you're shitting me....you think international law is ABOVE american law in our own land? that we should subjugate our constitution to FOREIGN laws?

if you don't like the cooperation, leave interpol. no-one forces you to stay in, right? you can't reap the benefits and not cooperate at the same time.

Why not? Interpol doesn't like it, they can leave. They can kiss my American ass while they're at it.
I don't care that the Euros have given up whatever rights they once had for socialism. That isn't my problem. My problem is to keep us from going too far down the Road to Serfdom. It is too late for the Euros.

rabbi, you are a great american.

 

[Yurt]

i am taking a neutral stance right now. i am certainly not following the one world order pee stained bullshit. if bullshit can be pee stained, hm. i think it can, as seen in this thread, haha. and i am also still laughing at the sentiment i thought i detected, where american law should supersede international law via exemptions.
15 American Exceptionalism and International Human Rights - Evangelical Lutheran Church in America

you're shitting me....you think international law is ABOVE american law in our own land? that we should subjugate our constitution to FOREIGN laws?

if you don't like the cooperation, leave interpol. no-one forces you to stay in, right? you can't reap the benefits and not cooperate at the same time.

stupid point....we have had and do have cooperation WITHOUT giving them immunity

giving them immunity doesn't give anymore cooperation, that is stupidest thing i've read thing today....what you're saying is, because we don't give our own FBI the same immunity, were are not cooperating with them

 

[Yurt]

i give up, the source hunt is kind of tiring. the blogosphere is in proto-meltdown mode and pollutes the search for a serious source, i don't feel like dumpster-diving no more.

apparently obama did this to extend immunity to bill ayers.


so far i go with the interpretation that a paper tiger grew some teeth, and some cannot accept that. probably, the same subset of americans who want to profit from interpol when interpol acts outside the US, want interpol to be a eunuch you can mock and kick around inside the US.

and it is certainly not like interpol is above the law. it is just not as dependent on US law in the US now as it was before.

happy kwanzaa

wrong, it enjoys full diplomatic immunity....amazing that a POLICE force needs full immunity....our own FBI doesn't enjoy their immunities but you have no problem with that becuase you are an obama apologist and must find some way to defend anything he does

it is more like that: i have no problem with it because i don't live in the US, but i see the hypocrisy of the US all the time. they want to benefit from international organizations, but if they don't play their way, they will claim exemptions. then they will complain that the castrated international organizations are not as effective as they could be and therefore the exemptions are validated.

the only thing i totally agree, and why i am still on the fence regarding this immunity thing is this: amazing that a police force needs full immunity. this can't be a good thing.

we had this a decade ago with europol; it is a complicated issue. the law and order types should be ecstatic.

i agree with your last two paragraphs

 

[L.K.Eder]

you're shitting me....you think international law is ABOVE american law in our own land? that we should subjugate our constitution to FOREIGN laws?

if you don't like the cooperation, leave interpol. no-one forces you to stay in, right? you can't reap the benefits and not cooperate at the same time.

stupid point....we have had and do have cooperation WITHOUT giving them immunity

giving them immunity doesn't give anymore cooperation, that is stupidest thing i've read thing today....what you're saying is, because we don't give our own FBI the same immunity, were are not cooperating with them

no

 

[Yurt]

In the meantime, Americans who are carrying "too much" cash can have it confiscated, with no probable cause, under the phony pretext that they might be dealing drugs.

More chains you can believe in.

It's been that way long before Obama.

:facepalm:

he never claimed it wasn't....

anyhooo, what are your thoughts on the subject matter of this thread?

 

[Yurt]

if you don't like the cooperation, leave interpol. no-one forces you to stay in, right? you can't reap the benefits and not cooperate at the same time.

stupid point....we have had and do have cooperation WITHOUT giving them immunity

giving them immunity doesn't give anymore cooperation, that is stupidest thing i've read thing today....what you're saying is, because we don't give our own FBI the same immunity, were are not cooperating with them

no

yes