It's truly hilarious that an entertainer (Rush) seems to have such a strong voice in preventing a President from accomplishing his progressive tyranny. Hats off to Mr. Limbaugh!!!
That's true, indirectly. Here's how it works, chronologically:
1. Limbaugh fires up his flock with a simplistic absolutism that keeps them angry and his ratings up
2. His flock buys it hook, line and sinker and gets politically active
3. Their anger ends up accounting for most of the energy in the party
4. That energy translates into influence, particularly in two areas:
- The nomination process, where their small but powerful voting bloc gets other simplistic absolutists on ballots
- An ability to intimidate sitting legislators into doing their bidding or be "primaried" by a simplistic absolutist who will
5. Those legislators, terrified they're going to lose their cushy gubmit jobs, become hardcore absolutists themselves to keep their base and their contributors happy
6. Frustrated, Obama points it out
So yeah, I think you're right. And it goes even further with the even
more rabid Hannity, Beck, Levin and Savage. They make the absolutist base even
bigger, even
more angry, even
more intimidating, scaring even
more otherwise pragmatic legislators into gumming up the formally fairly effective legislative process.
.