Obama Had His Records Sealed.....Isn't That Influencing An Election???

[HaShev]

Let's just use the "F" word here--------------FELONY!

And in this corrupt administration, they are starting to pile up.

Obama released every tax return in his entire life.

Trump refuses to release one.

Why?

Because Trump is terrified. As the felonies pile up, Trump is terrified for a reason. The fish rots from the head. And I smell.........bars. Trump and his ilk have bars in their futures. And I don't mean chocolate bars.

Wrong! Obama didn't report his sale of Persian rugs over $200,000 he was illegally gifted that he auctioned later. (a back door way of funneling pay to play money). YOU WOULD KNOW THIS IF MSM DID THEIR JOB INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING WITHOUT POLITICAL BIAS.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

I'm just asking......

It is, but it’s not illegal. Paying off a porn Star, as Trump did, is an attempt to influence an election, but it’s not illegal either.

 

[Faun]

Hillary's staff started the birther concept, your delusions helped repeat it here for no reason off topic=you end up being the conspirator by posting conspirator certificates, according to forum moderators moving your rants here. So why are you a birther if it's been disproven?

No, Hillary didn’t start the birther thing. It started on a rightwing website. You’re truly a fucking idiot, birther.

freerepublic.com

I was told today that Obama swore in on a Koran for his Senate seat. I do not believe he did. Can someone clarify this for me? I am under the impression only a Congressman has so far sworn in on a Koran.

Also that Obama’s mother gave birth to him overseas and then immediately flew into Hawaii and registered his birth as having taken place in Hawaii.

Again, any clarifications on this? Defintely disqualifies him for Prez. There must be some trace of an airticket. While small babies are not charged air fare they do have a ticket issued for them.

Long time ago but there may be some residual information somewhere. Good ammo (if available and true) BEST USED AFTER he becomes PREZ (if that occurs) and it’s too late for Dems - except accept the VP.

391 posted on 3/1/2008, 4:59 AM by FARS​

 

[mudwhistle]

Let's just use the "F" word here--------------FELONY!

And in this corrupt administration, they are starting to pile up.

Obama released every tax return in his entire life.

Trump refuses to release one.

Why?

Because Trump is terrified. As the felonies pile up, Trump is terrified for a reason. The fish rots from the head. And I smell.........bars. Trump and his ilk have bars in their futures. And I don't mean chocolate bars.

The felonies pile up?
Manafort was on trial for bank and tax fraud from 11 years ago.
Is that what we're paying millions for Mueller to go after?
Wasn't it supposed to be about Russian Collusion?
Or was Russian Collusion just a foot in the door to begin a fake investigation with the sole mission to overturn an election result?

 

[mudwhistle]

I'm just asking......

It is, but it’s not illegal. Paying off a porn Star, as Trump did, is an attempt to influence an election, but it’s not illegal either.

Explain how the absence of information influences anything.
You can say without a doubt that 95% negative coverage by the media does influence the election, right?
I mean, let's get realistic here.

 

[rightwinger]

Can anyone actually point to a case where the Great Obama had his records sealed?

 

[BuckToothMoron]

I'm just asking......

It is, but it’s not illegal. Paying off a porn Star, as Trump did, is an attempt to influence an election, but it’s not illegal either.

Explain how the absence of information influences anything.
You can say without a doubt that 95% negative coverage by the media does influence the election, right?
I mean, let's get realistic here.

Dude, come on. Imagine if when you voted between 2 candidates the only info you got was a picture of each canidate. Lack of info can be as influential as info.

 

[HaShev]

Hillary's staff started the birther concept, your delusions helped repeat it here for no reason off topic=you end up being the conspirator by posting conspirator certificates, according to forum moderators moving your rants here. So why are you a birther if it's been disproven?

No, Hillary didn’t start the birther thing. It started on a rightwing website. You’re truly a fucking idiot, birther.

freerepublic.com

I was told today that Obama swore in on a Koran for his Senate seat. I do not believe he did. Can someone clarify this for me? I am under the impression only a Congressman has so far sworn in on a Koran.

Also that Obama’s mother gave birth to him overseas and then immediately flew into Hawaii and registered his birth as having taken place in Hawaii.

Again, any clarifications on this? Defintely disqualifies him for Prez. There must be some trace of an airticket. While small babies are not charged air fare they do have a ticket issued for them.

Long time ago but there may be some residual information somewhere. Good ammo (if available and true) BEST USED AFTER he becomes PREZ (if that occurs) and it’s too late for Dems - except accept the VP.

391 posted on 3/1/2008, 4:59 AM by FARS​

When Hillary ran against Obama her staff discussed the Birther issue.
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH asking where you come from and verifying it, employees are required to ask this question, it's the law, so if the employer (the people) want to ask for proof and you make a case about it then you are anti-law and anti democracy rights of the people you disagree with and you are the one with the problem. So even though I'm not a birther, I am a believer in Democracy and see no problem with their right to know as per U.S. law on employment. YOU BEING A FASCIST SOCIALIST with broken glass stuck to your black hoodie ninja outfit do not agree with democracy nor the law and thus think you can control others, a pdychological issue you have because in real life you feel you have no control in your own life.
SO YOU LASH OUT, CUSS, SHOW
INTOLERANCE andcwhen you lose your arguments you lose control thus lie, pathelogically lie, use ad hominem responses, terror tactics, censorship, demonization attacks on opponents and many other sociopathic tendencies.
THERE IS HELP HOWEVER. Liberals offer you safe spaces in colleges with puppies and Play-doh to ease your stress.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Can anyone actually point to a case where the Great Obama had his records sealed?

No, they can't. That's why Rightwingnuts claim it's "common knowledge".

 

[HaShev]

Can anyone actually point to a case where the Great Obama had his records sealed?

No, they can't. That's why Rightwingnuts claim it's "common knowledge".

You just admited the problem with liberal media hiding and controling the news that you claim is not common knowledge. You also are delusional thinking if you never heard of it that it never happened.
You also bust your own sources since your MSM refuses to give Source and facts and are constantly caught in tabloid form rewriting what people do and say.
Lastly the post clearly had a source, so picking out 1 of many that needs your own research is not just intellectually dishonest and selective avoidance (ad hominem argument), but you also keep avoiding the substance with these ad hominem tactics thus exposing yourselves as knowing and wittingly being dishonest.
Which is a kind of admission of guilt. You inadvertantly admit lising your argument when you take that path in response and can't intellectually refute anything.
CHECKMATE!

 

[joaquinmiller]

Can anyone actually point to a case where the Great Obama had his records sealed?

No, they can't. That's why Rightwingnuts claim it's "common knowledge".

You just admited the problem with liberal media hiding and controling the news that you claim is not common knowledge. You also are delusional thinking if you never heard of it that it never happened.
You also bust your own sources since your MSM refuses to give Source and facts and are constantly caught in tabloid form rewriting what people do and say.
Lastly the post clearly had a source, so picking out 1 of many that needs your own research is not just intellectually dishonest and selective avoidance (ad hominem argument), but you also keep avoiding the substance with these ad hominem tactics thus exposing yourselves as knowing and wittingly being dishonest.
Which is a kind of admission of guilt. You inadvertantly admit lising your argument when you take that path in response and can't intellectually refute anything.
CHECKMATE!

That was a bunch of crap to avoid admitting that you can't actually point to a case where Obama had his records sealed.

 

[HaShev]

Can anyone actually point to a case where the Great Obama had his records sealed?

No, they can't. That's why Rightwingnuts claim it's "common knowledge".

You just admited the problem with liberal media hiding and controling the news that you claim is not common knowledge. You also are delusional thinking if you never heard of it that it never happened.
You also bust your own sources since your MSM refuses to give Source and facts and are constantly caught in tabloid form rewriting what people do and say.
Lastly the post clearly had a source, so picking out 1 of many that needs your own research is not just intellectually dishonest and selective avoidance (ad hominem argument), but you also keep avoiding the substance with these ad hominem tactics thus exposing yourselves as knowing and wittingly being dishonest.
Which is a kind of admission of guilt. You inadvertantly admit lising your argument when you take that path in response and can't intellectually refute anything.
CHECKMATE!

That was a bunch of crap to avoid admitting that you can't actually point to a case where Obama had his records sealed.

YOU NEVER WERE SPECIFIC, therefore your blanket statement nitpicking without refuting the substance was the cop out and dishonest, especially since I stated something different then the OP idea of sealed records.
MsM had stated the archives would be sealed for a number of years.
WHAT YOU ARE THINKING OF IS DIFFERENT TYPE OF DOCUMENTS:
The Obama Presidential Center in Chicago's Jackson Park will take a different route, opting out of thepresidential library network operated by the National Archives and Records Administration —and the millions of dollars in federal support that go along with membership.
According to the conceptual designs, the Obama center will be a three-building complex consisting of a high-rise museum tower and two low-slung structures: a "forum" containing an auditorium and a library building. In a break with convention, the latter will not house a collection of presidential documents and artifacts. Those will be stored in existing NARA facilities. Nonclassified documents will be available online.
ACCORDING TO THIS, you can research what I'm saying online, therefore if you can't find the information then you were wrong and owe
me an apology.
So tell me the answer to my question and request: if you say the WH logs are available and not sealed/hidden then tell us how many times the Russian Ambassador visited the WH and how many times his employee Ashley head of Resist visited towards the last months includingvafter Trump won the election and Obama plotted his revenge.
IF YOU CAN'T OR REFUSE TO ANSWER THEN ACCORDING TO YOUR STANDARD YOU COPED OUT AND FORFEIT your argument.
-checkmate!

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I'm just asking......

No, it's different.

 

[my2¢]

He had all his albums re-recorded by Seal?

 

[rightwinger]

Can anyone actually point to a case where the Great Obama had his records sealed?

No, they can't. That's why Rightwingnuts claim it's "common knowledge".

You just admited the problem with liberal media hiding and controling the news that you claim is not common knowledge. You also are delusional thinking if you never heard of it that it never happened.
You also bust your own sources since your MSM refuses to give Source and facts and are constantly caught in tabloid form rewriting what people do and say.
Lastly the post clearly had a source, so picking out 1 of many that needs your own research is not just intellectually dishonest and selective avoidance (ad hominem argument), but you also keep avoiding the substance with these ad hominem tactics thus exposing yourselves as knowing and wittingly being dishonest.
Which is a kind of admission of guilt. You inadvertantly admit lising your argument when you take that path in response and can't intellectually refute anything.
CHECKMATE!

Fake news...Fake news
Media is picking on us

Sounds just like Nixon

 

[Faun]

Hillary's staff started the birther concept, your delusions helped repeat it here for no reason off topic=you end up being the conspirator by posting conspirator certificates, according to forum moderators moving your rants here. So why are you a birther if it's been disproven?

No, Hillary didn’t start the birther thing. It started on a rightwing website. You’re truly a fucking idiot, birther.

freerepublic.com

I was told today that Obama swore in on a Koran for his Senate seat. I do not believe he did. Can someone clarify this for me? I am under the impression only a Congressman has so far sworn in on a Koran.

Also that Obama’s mother gave birth to him overseas and then immediately flew into Hawaii and registered his birth as having taken place in Hawaii.

Again, any clarifications on this? Defintely disqualifies him for Prez. There must be some trace of an airticket. While small babies are not charged air fare they do have a ticket issued for them.

Long time ago but there may be some residual information somewhere. Good ammo (if available and true) BEST USED AFTER he becomes PREZ (if that occurs) and it’s too late for Dems - except accept the VP.

391 posted on 3/1/2008, 4:59 AM by FARS​

When Hillary ran against Obama her staff discussed the Birther issue.
THERE IS NOTHING WRONG WITH asking where you come from and verifying it, employees are required to ask this question, it's the law, so if the employer (the people) want to ask for proof and you make a case about it then you are anti-law and anti democracy rights of the people you disagree with and you are the one with the problem. So even though I'm not a birther, I am a believer in Democracy and see no problem with their right to know as per U.S. law on employment. YOU BEING A FASCIST SOCIALIST with broken glass stuck to your black hoodie ninja outfit do not agree with democracy nor the law and thus think you can control others, a pdychological issue you have because in real life you feel you have no control in your own life.
SO YOU LASH OUT, CUSS, SHOW
INTOLERANCE andcwhen you lose your arguments you lose control thus lie, pathelogically lie, use ad hominem responses, terror tactics, censorship, demonization attacks on opponents and many other sociopathic tendencies.
THERE IS HELP HOWEVER. Liberals offer you safe spaces in colleges with puppies and Play-doh to ease your stress.

Do you ever stop whining like a baby? I posted the earliest known instance of birtherism on the Internet. Your whining doesn’t refute that.

 

[joaquinmiller]

Can anyone actually point to a case where the Great Obama had his records sealed?

No, they can't. That's why Rightwingnuts claim it's "common knowledge".

You just admited the problem with liberal media hiding and controling the news that you claim is not common knowledge. You also are delusional thinking if you never heard of it that it never happened.
You also bust your own sources since your MSM refuses to give Source and facts and are constantly caught in tabloid form rewriting what people do and say.
Lastly the post clearly had a source, so picking out 1 of many that needs your own research is not just intellectually dishonest and selective avoidance (ad hominem argument), but you also keep avoiding the substance with these ad hominem tactics thus exposing yourselves as knowing and wittingly being dishonest.
Which is a kind of admission of guilt. You inadvertantly admit lising your argument when you take that path in response and can't intellectually refute anything.
CHECKMATE!

That was a bunch of crap to avoid admitting that you can't actually point to a case where Obama had his records sealed.

YOU NEVER WERE SPECIFIC, therefore your blanket statement nitpicking without refuting the substance was the cop out and dishonest, especially since I stated something different then the OP idea of sealed records.
MsM had stated the archives would be sealed for a number of years.
WHAT YOU ARE THINKING OF IS DIFFERENT TYPE OF DOCUMENTS:
The Obama Presidential Center in Chicago's Jackson Park will take a different route, opting out of thepresidential library network operated by the National Archives and Records Administration —and the millions of dollars in federal support that go along with membership.
According to the conceptual designs, the Obama center will be a three-building complex consisting of a high-rise museum tower and two low-slung structures: a "forum" containing an auditorium and a library building. In a break with convention, the latter will not house a collection of presidential documents and artifacts. Those will be stored in existing NARA facilities. Nonclassified documents will be available online.
ACCORDING TO THIS, you can research what I'm saying online, therefore if you can't find the information then you were wrong and owe
me an apology.
So tell me the answer to my question and request: if you say the WH logs are available and not sealed/hidden then tell us how many times the Russian Ambassador visited the WH and how many times his employee Ashley head of Resist visited towards the last months includingvafter Trump won the election and Obama plotted his revenge.
IF YOU CAN'T OR REFUSE TO ANSWER THEN ACCORDING TO YOUR STANDARD YOU COPED OUT AND FORFEIT your argument.
-checkmate!

What I can decipher from this is that you can't show were Obama sealed his records.

 

[HaShev]

Can anyone actually point to a case where the Great Obama had his records sealed?

No, they can't. That's why Rightwingnuts claim it's "common knowledge".

You just admited the problem with liberal media hiding and controling the news that you claim is not common knowledge. You also are delusional thinking if you never heard of it that it never happened.
You also bust your own sources since your MSM refuses to give Source and facts and are constantly caught in tabloid form rewriting what people do and say.
Lastly the post clearly had a source, so picking out 1 of many that needs your own research is not just intellectually dishonest and selective avoidance (ad hominem argument), but you also keep avoiding the substance with these ad hominem tactics thus exposing yourselves as knowing and wittingly being dishonest.
Which is a kind of admission of guilt. You inadvertantly admit lising your argument when you take that path in response and can't intellectually refute anything.
CHECKMATE!

That was a bunch of crap to avoid admitting that you can't actually point to a case where Obama had his records sealed.

YOUR LACK OF REPLY to his WH log records proves it. And once again it was ABC I believe that made thst ststement and Liberal online media web sites talk about archives,
lazy person. Your excuses are typical of those who canct refute a subject, deny the evidence by saying it doesn't exist and take the subject off course =smokescreen (ad hominem tactic).
IF KISLYAK is notvan issue then please tell your senators and reps to have him brought back for questioning and emails subpoenad.
THEN SHOW US EVIDENCE YOU DID THIS.
When you interrogate the Russian Ambassador who is supposedly so important to this collusion case then we can have an intellectual discussion.
IN THE MEAN TIME stop acting like a five year old cry baby who had his blanky taken away.

 

[HaShev]

Can anyone actually point to a case where the Great Obama had his records sealed?

No, they can't. That's why Rightwingnuts claim it's "common knowledge".

You just admited the problem with liberal media hiding and controling the news that you claim is not common knowledge. You also are delusional thinking if you never heard of it that it never happened.
You also bust your own sources since your MSM refuses to give Source and facts and are constantly caught in tabloid form rewriting what people do and say.
Lastly the post clearly had a source, so picking out 1 of many that needs your own research is not just intellectually dishonest and selective avoidance (ad hominem argument), but you also keep avoiding the substance with these ad hominem tactics thus exposing yourselves as knowing and wittingly being dishonest.
Which is a kind of admission of guilt. You inadvertantly admit lising your argument when you take that path in response and can't intellectually refute anything.
CHECKMATE!

That was a bunch of crap to avoid admitting that you can't actually point to a case where Obama had his records sealed.

YOU NEVER WERE SPECIFIC, therefore your blanket statement nitpicking without refuting the substance was the cop out and dishonest, especially since I stated something different then the OP idea of sealed records.
MsM had stated the archives would be sealed for a number of years.
WHAT YOU ARE THINKING OF IS DIFFERENT TYPE OF DOCUMENTS:
The Obama Presidential Center in Chicago's Jackson Park will take a different route, opting out of thepresidential library network operated by the National Archives and Records Administration —and the millions of dollars in federal support that go along with membership.
According to the conceptual designs, the Obama center will be a three-building complex consisting of a high-rise museum tower and two low-slung structures: a "forum" containing an auditorium and a library building. In a break with convention, the latter will not house a collection of presidential documents and artifacts. Those will be stored in existing NARA facilities. Nonclassified documents will be available online.
ACCORDING TO THIS, you can research what I'm saying online, therefore if you can't find the information then you were wrong and owe
me an apology.
So tell me the answer to my question and request: if you say the WH logs are available and not sealed/hidden then tell us how many times the Russian Ambassador visited the WH and how many times his employee Ashley head of Resist visited towards the last months includingvafter Trump won the election and Obama plotted his revenge.
IF YOU CAN'T OR REFUSE TO ANSWER THEN ACCORDING TO YOUR STANDARD YOU COPED OUT AND FORFEIT your argument.
-checkmate!

What I can decipher from this is that you can't show were Obama sealed his records.

What you proved is you couldn't find the archived WH log according to your confusion over document storage is claimed "online" and public. If his "records" are online and you aren't confusing which documents we speak of then you'd be able to easily answer my simple question about who visited the WH how many times. You refuse to answer because you can't and then you take it out on me (pride), so when you can't, you displace and deflect blame-first chapter of Psychology 101.

 

[MisterBeale]