Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[BULLDOG]

PURE UNADULTERATED BULLSHIT

Held: Under our constitutional structure of separated powers, the nature of Presidential power entitles a former President to absolute immunity from criminal prosecution for actions within his conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority. And he is entitled to at least presumptive immunity from prosecution for all his official acts. There is no immunity for unofficial acts. Pp. 5–43.

NONE OF OBAMA'S TREASONOUS SEDITIOUS ACTS WERE AUTHORIZED BY THE CONSTITUTION . NONE

Trump often disagrees with information from his briefings, and publicly says so

 

[Lisa558]

At least Clinton responded and cooperated. Trump hid his classified documents from a grand jury subpoena, which is a felony.

He “cooperated” by committing perjury?! What a defense!

 

[Delldude]

You mean like trump using his cabinet to purge those he sees as his enemy?

That's a presidential power.

 

[berg80]

He “cooperated” by committing perjury?! What a defense!

You know trump was indicted partly for refusing to comply with a subpoena for the classified docs he stole, right?

 

[Dr. Phosphorous]

This thread doesn't discuss how horrible you might think Obama is, or if he is guilty of treason. None of those thing matter. The SC granted trump, and all presidents immunity from prosecution for anything that can remotely be tied to his powers as president. Can you think of a legal reason why trump was able to walk, but Obama should be charged?
If so, now is the time to educate us all. I look forward to your reasoned legal opinion.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf/23-939_e2pg.pdf

Brilliant post!

Yes, Obama was performing officials duties protecting the country. Even if MAGA imbeciles think that Obama lied about "Russian collusion", they have nowhere to go with this.

 

[Delldude]

Yes, Obama was performing officials duties protecting the country.

That's about the stupidest thing you've ever posted.

 

[Marener]

He “cooperated” by committing perjury?! What a defense!

He “cooperated” by committing perjury?! What a defense!

Hillary didn’t commit perjury.

But Trump obstructed justice.

 

[Marener]

That's about the stupidest thing you've ever posted.

Trump didn’t want people to know the truth about Russia meddling in the election. Obama is the only reason we known the truth.

 

[Contumacious]

You know trump was indicted partly for refusing to comply with a subpoena for the classified docs he stole, right?

President Trump was the subject of a FAKE INDICTMENT in order to INTERFERE WITH THE ELECTION , ie, KEEP HIM AWAY FROM HE WHITEHOUSE

 

[Lisa558]

You mean like trump using his cabinet to purge those he sees as his enemy?

You mean can the U.S, President select his own cabinet?

 

[Delldude]

Trump didn’t want people to know the truth about Russia meddling in the election. Obama is the only reason we known the truth.

Your problem with that line of thinking is Obama has been caught ordering Intel assessments altered to make it look like Russia did interfere on Trump behalf.

Hillary didn’t commit perjury.

Which time?

But Trump obstructed justice

Never indicted nor proven.

 

[Lisa558]

You know trump was indicted partly for refusing to comply with a subpoena for the classified docs he stole, right?

And you know that Hillary was excused for DESTROYING documents under subpoena? And excused for hiding classified information on her own personal server?

When the Dems start holding their people accountable for their actions, then we’ll talk.

 

[berg80]

You mean can the U.S, President select his own cabinet?

That isn't the issue, as you know. The issue is selecting the people he chose to make sure illegal/unethical requests of them he makes are not objected to.

 

[Marener]

Your problem with that line of thinking is Obama has been caught ordering Intel assessments altered to make it look like Russia did interfere on Trump behalf.

The intelligence assessment was correct. The only difference was that it was listed as high confidence and the CIA thought it should be moderate confidence.

Trump didn’t even want us to know that Russia hacked the DNC. He was trying to blame anyone else.

 

[berg80]

And you know that Hillary was excused for DESTROYING documents under subpoena? And excused for hiding classified information on her own personal server?

When the Dems start holding their people accountable for their actions, then we’ll talk.

True or false. The trump government had every opportunity to hold Hillary accountable for the crimes you allege she committed?

The FBI investigated the matter and found no evidence that any work-related emails were "intentionally deleted in an effort to conceal them."

 

[Marener]

Never indicted nor proven.

It was definitely indicted. The fact that the FBI pulled classified documents out of Mara a Lago proves it.

 

[Marener]

And you know that Hillary was excused for DESTROYING documents under subpoena?

Thoroughly investigated and there was no evidence to suggest she did so.

That’s a hoax used to attack a political opponent, which is supposedly illegal according to you geniuses.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Trump addresses our concern here, BULLDOG.

Trump says SCOTUS immunity ruling likely helps Obama in light of Gabbard, DNI findings

President Donald Trump said Friday that former President Barack Obama “owes me big" following the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling.

www.foxnews.com

"Probably helps him a lot. But it doesn't help the people around him."

Doh!

Obama would have pardoned the people around him as the Autopen did, but Obama was so uppity, he assumed he would never get caught.

 

[Lisa558]

That isn't the issue, as you know. The issue is selecting the people he chose to make sure illegal/unethical requests of them he makes are not objected to.

Biden picked people to follow his orders too, even if they were illegal.

If anything is illegal, the SCOTUS stops it. As far as “unethical,” that’s a matter of opinion.

Trump has been doing a GREAT job.

 

[Delldude]

The intelligence assessment was correct. The only difference was that it was listed as high confidence and the CIA thought it should be moderate confidence.

That was from the 2017 Intel assessment that recently has been proven extremely corrupted by Obama and his clown posse.