Obama can't be prosecuted. You can thank Trump for that.

[AntonToo]

Coercing the intelligence agencies to completely manufacture a fake Russian Collusion Hoax

In your own words:

How did FBI get coerced into criminally investigating Trump campaign for "Russian collusion"?

How did Obama force Trump campaign member named Papadopoulos to lie about his knowledge that Russia has Clinton's emails?

How did Obama then force Trump DOJ IG to publish a report in 2019 which concluded that this investigation was properly predicated?

How did Obama then force Senate Intelligence com chaired by Marco Rubio to release report in 2020 backing all that?


If you don't have your own words to answer these questions then maybe it's time to get a clue - Gabbard is selling you bullshit to divert from Trump's Epstein blowback.

 

[dudmuck]

You're a ******* idiot.

Ask me for the evidence. Just how ridiculous can one get?


You know that I don't work for the DOJ and I would be fired if I did provide you with their evidence, you silly ****.

 

[postman]

I can

But in your context have no idea what it means

As you said

The dossier paid for by Hillary was total lies that obama (allegedly) instructed his underlings to present as facts

Remember Dick Cheney's famous trip to CIA headquarters in the middle of the night.
Cheney and Rumsfeld's office of special plans.
And their instruction to include intel from a person codename "curveball" that the German intelligence already rejected as unreliable.
Brought about the biggest manipulation of national intelligence, where they manufactured WMD's and atomic programs, like centrifuges made of aluminum tubes that were too short.

 

[Marener]

No

The dossier paid for by Hillary was total lies that obama (allegedly) instructed his underlings to present as facts

Is that what they’re telling you? Of course that’s not anywhere in the actual evidence.

But when did it even happen anyway?

 

[Marener]

Bondi is not claiming that. And its immaterial.

What's material are the actions by Obama.

Great. So if Bondi isn’t claiming it then what is the problem?

What actions by Obama constitute this coup attempt?

 

[Marener]

Nevermind I can't help you're too stupid to get it.

I’m not stupid enough to believe Bondi. She’s really selling bullshit but you eat it up with a grin on your face.

 

[AntonToo]

No wrong doing is conceded. There is no need to discuss their accusation because even if they were true, he has immunity.

Meh, you are kinda conceding it when you start talking about how no criminal prosecution can be had.

Why would you even go there is there is no wrongdoing shown in the first place, prosecutable or not.

 

[Mac-7]

As you said

Remember Dick Cheney's famous trip to CIA headquarters in the middle of the night.
Cheney and Rumsfeld's office of special plans.
And their instruction to include intel from a person codename "curveball" that the German intelligence already rejected as unreliable.
Brought about the biggest manipulation of national intelligence, where they manufactured WMD's and atomic programs, like centrifuges made of aluminum tubes that were too short.

If you are trying to say that Bush was part of the CIA lies I dont think so

He was as surprised as anyone else when no WMDs were found

 

[Skylar]

They have a trail showing Obama's intelligence team rejected an intelligence brief stating that Russia was not favoring either candidate the day before it was to be published.

You have a paper trail that there was debate on the topic. And that the intelligence team ultimately decided that Russia helping Trump's campaign reflected a preference for his election over Hillary Clinton.

How is that war against the United States? How is that an attempt destroy or overthrow the US government? How could an ICA report that was finished in January have 'rigged' an election in November?

How is that any crime? None of Trump's hysteric pseudo legal gibberish makes the slightest sense. This, like his claims of a stolen election in 2020, isn't a serious legal argument.

Its theater for dipshits to try and distract them from the Epstein files.

Then Obama and some on his intelligence team had a new one written showing the opposite about Trump and used the already discredited Steele Dossier as proof. That one went out.

How do you explain that?

Obama ordered a full review of the ICA on December 5th. There's no evidence that he ordered that the ICA to include language about Russia's preference for Trump. Nor any evidence that there is any crime if it did.

And treason for revising an ICA report? A COUP? MAGA's proclivity for hysteric hyperbole and pseudo-legal mad-libs doesn't translate into any viable legal arguments. Its meaningless gibberish.

 

[Mac-7]

Is that what they’re telling you? Of course that’s not anywhere in the actual evidence.

But when did it even happen anyway?

I think as this story unfolds you will have to tell even bigger whoppers in defense of obama

 

[Skylar]

We'll just see what the law says about that, counselor. You ain't no lawyer or patriot. STFU.

Laughing......you can't make this hysteric hyperbole work. Where the review of an ICA report constitutes WAR AGAINST THE UNITED STATES and an attempt to destroy and overthrow the US government?

That's silly. This is like Trump's 2020 claims of a stolen election.....these aren't serious legal arguments. They're red meat for the MAGA base....in this case to try and distract them from Epstein.

Nothing will come of this pseudo-legal gibberish.

 

[Independent thinker]

like rudy said. plenty of theories, no proof.

There is proof. Not really any theories.

 

[postman]

Meh, you are kinda conceding it when you start talking about how no criminal prosecution can be had.

Why would you even go there is there is no wrongdoing shown in the first place, prosecutable or not.

This is being done as an Epstein distraction.
They know that even if there was something there, anything, it's too late to investigate it for any actual criminal activity.

It would be like opening up an investigation of Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky all over again.

 

[Skylar]

This is being done as an Epstein distraction.
They know that even if there was something there, anything, it's too late to investigate it for any actual criminal activity.

It would be like opening up an investigation of Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky all over again.

100%. And its failing.

 

[buckeye]

What actions by Obama constitute this coup attempt?

Did you even watch the press conference???

Obama's intelligence team rejected a briefing showing that Russia had tried to sew chaos and confusion in the 2016 election but did not favor either candidate the day before it was to be published. They actually held back intel they had about Hillary during the 2016 campaign and intended to use it against her before her inauguration.

Obama instructed them to rewrite the briefing which they did and used the Steele Dossier, which they all knew had already been discredited, as proof that the Russians favored Trump and tried to get him elected. That briefing was published.

Tulsi provided the paper trail, a timeline and details about all of this.

 

[postman]

If you are trying to say that Bush was part of the CIA lies I dont think so

He was as surprised as anyone else when no WMDs were found

Where did I mention Bush.
I said Cheney, and Rumsfeld cooked the intelligence books. And then Bush made Colin Powell present those lies to the UN.

 

[BULLDOG]

Going to have to let it all be played out to see if you are right about any of it.

yep

 

[Skylar]

Read slower.

They (Brandon and Kumswaller) know who's in the Epstein file.

They could name names, INCLUDING Trump's NAME, if they wanted to.

So, why aren't they doing so?

Whataboutry doesn't change the fact that MAGA campaigned on the release the Epstein files. Biden and Kamala can't release them.

Trump can. But instead of releasing them, his administration refuses and suppresses the evidence. They lie about the content of the Epstein files. MAGA makes up conspiracy about the Democrats 'altering' the Epstein filed, backed by nothing. They gaslight, insisting that only weaklings would even ask about the Epstein files.

Every time you want to bring up Biden and Kamala, you splatter on the same wall: they can't release the Epstein files now.

Trump can. That makes this 100% his problem.

 

[Skylar]

Did you even watch the press conference???

Obama's intelligence team rejected a briefing showing that Russia had tried to sew chaos and confusion in the 2016 election but did not favor either candidate the day before it was to be published. They actually held back intel they had about Hillary during the 2016 campaign and intended to use it against her before her inauguration.

Obama instructed them to rewrite the briefing which they did and used the Steele Dossier, which they all knew had already been discredited, as proof that the Russians favored Trump and tried to get him elected. That briefing was published.

Tulsi provided the paper trail, a timeline and details about all of this.

You're not describing a coup attempt. You're describing a revision of a ICA report. There's no attempt to destroy or overthrow the US government. Nor a plausible path for it to happen. Which, of course, never happened.

The paper trail doesn't establish ANY crime. Let alone sedition, election rigging, treason or a coup.

 

[postman]

Did you even watch the press conference???

Obama's intelligence team rejected a briefing showing that Russia had tried to sew chaos and confusion in the 2016 election but did not favor either candidate the day before it was to be published. They actually held back intel they had about Hillary during the 2016 campaign and intended to use it against her before her inauguration.

Do you have a date for this intelligence report and re-write.

Because after election day, by law, every briefing that Obama got from the DNI, Trump would get the same briefing