H
Harpy Eagle
Guest
No. Because kids eventually turn 27 and donāt possess the coping skills to live as adults without dependency on their parents. All BHO did was extend adolescence. Now that didnāt impact me at all but I found this action puzzling. You cannot measure everything in $$. The economy is cranking and you still vilify DJT. Youāre being a hypocrite.
I disagree that allowing children to stay on an insurance policy till 25 (where did the 27 come from?) extends adolescence. Our daughter who just turned 24 stayed on my policy till she graduated college and got a job, at which time she was able to provide her own insurance. She was not an adolescent while going through nursing school, but she was busy as hell and not having to worry about going to the doctor if she got sick helped her to focus on what was important.
It had nothing to do with coping skills, it had to do with common sense.
It gets into the weeds a bit but just because you have insurance doesnāt mean you get proper medical care. There are physicians with whom you āclickā and there are physicians with whom you do not. If youāve been on your momās Aetna plan for 15 years and have seen Dr. Smith over in Scottsdaleā¦you may (or may not) like Smithās approach to treating your disease. Even if you are able to get your own insurance after turning 18 and working at Target or Wal*Mart, Dr. Smith may not be on your insurance so you can avoid the costs of the insurance and having to go see another doctorā¦.and it doesnāt cost anyone outside of you or your family a penny.
Seems like a win-win.
Azog might have a minor stroke when he finds out my daughter is still on my cellphone plan.



