NYC: More Black Babies Killed by Abortion Than Born -

[ScienceRocks]

It's either abortion($500) or more welfare(tens of thousands of dollars), which is it mr.small government?

You assume they weren't conceived by loving responsible woman/girls speaks more to where your head is, not the pro life small govt people.

Not saying there isn't those kinds of responsible people. BUT you're ignoring reality as most on the left do with the crime stats if you think the majority are...

I don't expect a extremist to think about the data.

 

[Lovebears65]

And? You hate black people, remember? Black people commit crimes and mooch off the system, remember? Black people use drugs, steal car stereos, and rape wholesome Christian white women, remember, Confederate douche?

Go **** yourself.

who says I hate black people. I do not. My niece is biracial. Just because I don't like the presidents policies doesn't mean I hate blackpeople!!

 

[KNB]

Maybe they're loving, responsible parents who are so broke that they can't afford to raise a child and have to opt for an abortion, because the majority of the world's wealth is being hoarded by a minute percentage of the population.

 

[KNB]

And? You hate black people, remember? Black people commit crimes and mooch off the system, remember? Black people use drugs, steal car stereos, and rape wholesome Christian white women, remember, Confederate douche?

Go **** yourself.

who says I hate black people. I do not. My niece is biracial. Just because I don't like the presidents policies doesn't mean I hate blackpeople!!

You're blaming Obama for abortions in New York?

That's terrible logic.

Do you want more black children born into poverty? Why? You don't want to pay for their food assistance, housing assistance, daycare assistance, medical assistance, or their education, so why do you insist that people stop having abortions?

 

[Plasmaball]

break out the party balloons!

 

[R.D.]

It's either abortion($500) or more welfare(tens of thousands of dollars), which is it mr.small government?

You assume they weren't conceived by loving responsible woman/girls speaks more to where your head is, not the pro life small govt people.

Not saying there isn't those kinds of responsible people. BUT you're ignoring reality as most on the left do with the crime stats if you think the majority are...

I don't expect a extremist to think about the data.

Neither did I. Crime stats of the living have nothing to do with killing the unborn.

On average, women give at least 3 reasons for choosing abortion: 3/4 say that having a baby would interfere with work, school or other responsibilities; about 3/4 say they cannot afford a child; and 1/2 say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner (AGI).LINK

Shoots a hole in your bait.

 

[NYcarbineer]

On the one hand you have the people who want to offer everyone, included black women, the option of legal birth control and abortion,

on the other hand you have the conservatives who want to end the social programs that aid the poor,

and in the opinion of conservatives, encourage poor women to have babies that they can't afford to raise without government assistance. Take that money away, say the conservatives, and you'll see fewer babies.

Now which of those is supposed to be genocidal?

 

[R.D.]

On the one hand you have the people who want to offer everyone, included black women, the option of legal birth control and abortion,

on the other hand you have the conservatives who want to end the social programs that aid the poor,

and in the opinion of conservatives, encourage poor women to have babies that they can't afford to raise without government assistance. Take that money away, say the conservatives, and you'll see fewer babies.

Now which of those is supposed to be genocidal?

So all blacks are poor and on the dole. But you're not racist, the conservative are

 

[ScienceRocks]

break out the party balloons!

Parents that don't want to be there for their children, probably should be on birth control or have abortions.

responsibility and all that shit the right wing talks about all the time. I hope black men slowly become more responsible as that's the way towards real advancement.

 

[KNB]

You assume they weren't conceived by loving responsible woman/girls speaks more to where your head is, not the pro life small govt people.

Not saying there isn't those kinds of responsible people. BUT you're ignoring reality as most on the left do with the crime stats if you think the majority are...

I don't expect a extremist to think about the data.

Neither did I. Crime stats of the living have nothing to do with killing the unborn.

On average, women give at least 3 reasons for choosing abortion: 3/4 say that having a baby would interfere with work, school or other responsibilities; about 3/4 say they cannot afford a child; and 1/2 say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner (AGI).LINK

Shoots a hole in your bait.

So you just proved what I said. The women would be loving, responsible parents if they could afford it. The reason that they can't afford it isn't because they're lazy moochers on food stamps but because the overwhelming majority of the world's wealth is concentrated to as few people as possible.

If you want to lower the number of abortions, tell the international billionaire bankers and corporate CEOs to spend their fortunes on higher wages and better benefits for the world's working poor and let the wealth "trickle down".

 

[R.D.]

Not saying there isn't those kinds of responsible people. BUT you're ignoring reality as most on the left do with the crime stats if you think the majority are...

I don't expect a extremist to think about the data.

Neither did I. Crime stats of the living have nothing to do with killing the unborn.

On average, women give at least 3 reasons for choosing abortion: 3/4 say that having a baby would interfere with work, school or other responsibilities; about 3/4 say they cannot afford a child; and 1/2 say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner (AGI).LINK

Shoots a hole in your bait.

So you just proved what I said. The women would be loving, responsible parents if they could afford it. The reason that they can't afford it isn't because they're lazy moochers on food stamps but because the overwhelming majority of the world's wealth is concentrated to as few people as possible.
.

We need to give out stupid awards at USMB and runners ups. You could win three just for this post

 

[alan1]

It's either abortion($500) or more welfare(tens of thousands of dollars), which is it mr.small government?

No, not really. Those aren't the only two choices in this circumstance.
Allow me to introduce the option of NOT providing welfare and your argument falls apart.
It is not incumbent upon me to provide for the well being of others simply because they made a poor choice in life.

 

[KNB]

Can you refute it? I don't want to delve too deep into Abort73.com because the website sounds as credible as infowars, but you're calculations must take into account dual votes for those reasons that so many women have abortions.

3/4 = 75%. 3/4 can't vote that having a child will interfere with work while another 3/4 vote that they can't afford it. This means that 75% of women surveyed according to your link said that the reason that they had an abortion was that it would interfere with work AND they can't afford to raise a child. Do you see the problem? The problem is not abortion. The problem is that these women are constantly working for not enough money in today's society. Why don't these women make enough money? Why don't record corporate profits trickle back down to the employees who supplied those profits? Then those employees might be able to afford to have a child.

Why does this not make sense to you?

 

[R.D.]

Can you refute it? I don't want to delve too deep into Abort73.com because the website sounds as credible as infowars, but you're calculations must take into account dual votes for those reasons that so many women have abortions.

3/4 = 75%. 3/4 can't vote that having a child will interfere with work while another 3/4 vote that they can't afford it. This means that 75% of women surveyed according to your link said that the reason that they had an abortion was that it would interfere with work AND they can't afford to raise a child. Do you see the problem? The problem is not abortion. The problem is that these women are constantly working for not enough money in today's society. Why don't these women make enough money? Why don't record corporate profits trickle back down to the employees who supplied those profits? Then those employees might be able to afford to have a child.

Why does this not make sense to you?

Ok.

You are making assumption to support our views. A family of five living comfortably in middle class can also due to no longer have more children. A woman of 25 enjoying her life my decide. A career woman climbing the corp. ladder. A family with too many under a certain age already. A well to do family who only wants so many kids. A blended family with enough kids already. An adulterer who doesn't want the child. The reasons why woman (families) who are self sufficient having abortions can be exhaustive

The problem is abortion, they choose to kill the developing child rather than change their comfortable situation.

 

[KNB]

Can you refute it? I don't want to delve too deep into Abort73.com because the website sounds as credible as infowars, but you're calculations must take into account dual votes for those reasons that so many women have abortions.

3/4 = 75%. 3/4 can't vote that having a child will interfere with work while another 3/4 vote that they can't afford it. This means that 75% of women surveyed according to your link said that the reason that they had an abortion was that it would interfere with work AND they can't afford to raise a child. Do you see the problem? The problem is not abortion. The problem is that these women are constantly working for not enough money in today's society. Why don't these women make enough money? Why don't record corporate profits trickle back down to the employees who supplied those profits? Then those employees might be able to afford to have a child.

Why does this not make sense to you?

Ok.

You are making assumption to support our views. A family of five living comfortably in middle class can also due to no longer have more children. A woman of 25 enjoying her life my decide. A career woman climbing the corp. ladder. A family with too many under a certain age already. A well to do family who only wants so many kids. A blended family with enough kids already. An adulterer who doesn't want the child. The reasons why woman (families) who are self sufficient having abortions can be exhaustive

The problem is abortion, they choose to kill the developing child rather than change their comfortable situation.

Since your sentences are broken English, I'll assume that you weren't born in the United States or England, or you are a simpering Republican Conservative Christian with no idea of how reality works. There never was a talking snake, so the Bible is obviously not true from that point on.

75% of women said that having a child will interfere with work (her only means of supporting herself or her child) and that they can't afford it already on their meager income. Or was it 75% said it would interfere with work, and yet another 75% who said that they can't afford it, thus making 150% of women surveyed saying either that having a child would interfere with work or that they can't afford it? Oh, then there's the other 50% who said that they don't want to be a single parent, so then you'd have a total of 200% of women saying that they have abortions because they can't afford it on their meager incomes as a single parent?

So are you honestly trying to argue that millions of women should go further into poverty instead of having an abortion?

 

[Moonglow]

No, they don't want abortions no matter what happens.

 

[NYcarbineer]

On the one hand you have the people who want to offer everyone, included black women, the option of legal birth control and abortion,

on the other hand you have the conservatives who want to end the social programs that aid the poor,

and in the opinion of conservatives, encourage poor women to have babies that they can't afford to raise without government assistance. Take that money away, say the conservatives, and you'll see fewer babies.

Now which of those is supposed to be genocidal?

So all blacks are poor and on the dole. But you're not racist, the conservative are

I didn't say that. Are you illiterate? Are you a product of mobile homeschooling?

 

[R.D.]

Can you refute it? I don't want to delve too deep into Abort73.com because the website sounds as credible as infowars, but you're calculations must take into account dual votes for those reasons that so many women have abortions.

3/4 = 75%. 3/4 can't vote that having a child will interfere with work while another 3/4 vote that they can't afford it. This means that 75% of women surveyed according to your link said that the reason that they had an abortion was that it would interfere with work AND they can't afford to raise a child. Do you see the problem? The problem is not abortion. The problem is that these women are constantly working for not enough money in today's society. Why don't these women make enough money? Why don't record corporate profits trickle back down to the employees who supplied those profits? Then those employees might be able to afford to have a child.

Why does this not make sense to you?

Ok.

You are making assumption to support our views. A family of five living comfortably in middle class can also due to no longer have more children. A woman of 25 enjoying her life my decide. A career woman climbing the corp. ladder. A family with too many under a certain age already. A well to do family who only wants so many kids. A blended family with enough kids already. An adulterer who doesn't want the child. The reasons why woman (families) who are self sufficient having abortions can be exhaustive

The problem is abortion, they choose to kill the developing child rather than change their comfortable situation.

Since your sentences are broken English, I'll assume that you weren't born in the United States or England, or you are a simpering Republican Conservative Christian with no idea of how reality works. There never was a talking snake, so the Bible is obviously not true from that point on.

75% of women said that having a child will interfere with work (her only means of supporting herself or her child) and that they can't afford it already on their meager income. Or was it 75% said it would interfere with work, and yet another 75% who said that they can't afford it, thus making 150% of women surveyed saying either that having a child would interfere with work or that they can't afford it? Oh, then there's the other 50% who said that they don't want to be a single parent, so then you'd have a total of 200% of women saying that they have abortions because they can't afford it on their meager incomes as a single parent?

So are you honestly trying to argue that millions of women should go further into poverty instead of having an abortion?

At first I thought you were stupid, I was right. Now I think your an ass. I'm right again. You also are ignorant. Unable to understand simple reasoning. I think you're a racist too, but then again being stupid you don't know you are.

Millions of woman? The op states 33,328 and NY

 

[Lovebears65]

And? You hate black people, remember? Black people commit crimes and mooch off the system, remember? Black people use drugs, steal car stereos, and rape wholesome Christian white women, remember, Confederate douche?

Go **** yourself.

who says I hate black people. I do not. My niece is biracial. Just because I don't like the presidents policies doesn't mean I hate blackpeople!!

You're blaming Obama for abortions in New York?

That's terrible logic.

Do you want more black children born into poverty? Why? You don't want to pay for their food assistance, housing assistance, daycare assistance, medical assistance, or their education, so why do you insist that people stop having abortions?

Did I say Obama name once. NO YOU DID .. so who is the racist. The one looking in your mirror

 

[Derideo_Te]

It's either abortion($500) or more welfare(tens of thousands of dollars), which is it mr.small government?

No, not really. Those aren't the only two choices in this circumstance.
Allow me to introduce the option of NOT providing welfare and your argument falls apart.
It is not incumbent upon me to provide for the well being of others simply because they made a poor choice in life.

The alternative to "NOT providing welfare" is more poverty and crime. It will become incumbent upon you to provide more police, courts, legal aid, jails, prison officers, food and healthcare to those you incarcerate for the crime of making the "poor choice" to be born poor and having no other options but crime in order to survive.