The investigation into allegations the Russian government tried to interfere in our election has been going on since the DNC hack a year ago, and yet not one piece of evidence has been produced to indicate the Russia government has done anything. Based on the facts in evidence the only logical conclusion is that the entire Russian narrative was invented by the Obama administration to try to influence the election in favor of Clinton. The important question now is not who will go to prison but how do we prevent future governments from repeating the Obama administration's assault on our democratic institutions.
You are the ones who are assaulting our democratic institutions. 17 intelligence agencies concluded that the Russians did interfere in our elections. These are people who are working to protect us yet you attack them because you don't like their conclusion. A former FBI agent testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee and talked about Russian attempts to interfere in our elections since 2009.
Even now we have seen several Russian attempts to interfere in other countries' elections. Brexit in England and Presidential elections in the Netherlands and France. In France, we have even seen hacking attacks used against their favored candidate's opponent.
The fact remains that there is not one fact in evidence to support Obama's Russia narrative. How can this be? All these people from the Obama administration promoting the Russia narrative and yet not one of them can produce a single fact to support it. Now, a year after the investigation began, based on the facts in evidence a reasonable person will conclude the whole Russia narrative was just an invention of the Obama administration to try to influence the election in Clinton's favor, and will want to hold to account all those who misused our intelligence services for political purposes.
Let me explain something called classified information. It basically means that for reasons such as potential interference in an investigation, or tipping off the subject of the investigation, the public cannot be told certain information.
Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation.
lol Do you actutally believe any of that? You say, "Many investigations have taken years before anything definite was found, but a year of investigation is almost never enough time to uncover the full truth, especially when a majority of the president's colleagues have reason to be obstructing the investigation." Which means you consider it possible that there is no evidence at the present time to support these allegations. But if there is no evidence to support the allegations, why has the Obama administration been talking about them as if they are proven facts. An investigation that cannot produce a single fact in evidence after a year is called a witch hunt.
I understand you really want all of these allegations to be true, but there was never a single fact in evidence to suggest there was a legitimate for any investigation. Unless you are just a true believer who has no use for facts or evidence, the only reasonable conclusion at this point is the the entire Russia narrative was invented by the Obama administration to try to influence the election in favor of Clinton.
