- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,518
- 2,165
- Banned
- #21
I see you can count to 4. I was addressing you I don't give a damn who you were posting to.No I'm just telling the board clown jokey he doesn't know anything anymore than anyone else in this forum.Neither are you jake, nobody in this forum is qualified to say anything about the grand jury decision, nobody on this forum knows what evidence they was allowed for them to hear it. So jake you need to shut the fuck up.keys, you are not equipped or qualified morally or otherwise to make such a judgement about evil. Remember that your opinion is not evidence.
Yes, my opinion is that the grand jury did a good job in a terrible context. Good on them.
That's like telling a historian who is reviewing historical documents for a paper that his thesis is full of crap because there is no way he could have known. No sir. Most of the relevant evidence has been released in this case. I can make an assessment now. Based on that evidence, the Jury was more than correct in their failure to indict. With that said, I wish it had gone to trial. Based on the evidence it would have been the most hilarious murder trial in recent times. The prosecution would have looked like a bunch of jackasses in leu of the overwhelming evidence that the officer is innocent of the charges presented. There is no way they could have made reasonable doubt!
One, I was talking only about keys.
Two, I think the grand jury did a commendable job in a tough situation.
Three, I agree with its decision.
Four, you are a joke, as always.
You are simply a laughable wimp, bigreb, not a thug.