‘Now Hiring White People’…would our POTUS approve if such signage could be found in front of private enterprises?

[BrokeLoser]

Yes, if I were a business that only hired wealthy black men for twenty five decades.

So you’d stay discrimination laws until dark people “catch up”…..effectively applying racism to beat racism?
That really makes sense in WokeTardia?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I have zero issues with private companies saying “Jews not welcome”. I ll go elsewhere. Govt agencies should not do that. Private businesses should be allowed to operate as they like. I use the Jew example as I am Jewish. g5000 is an idiot.

 

[YoursTruly]

So you’d stay discrimination laws until dark people “catch up”…..effectively applying racism to beat racism?
That really makes sense in WokeTardia?

The left has really nothing to say about equality and advancing minorities. There was two women of color vying to be president. Both were rejected. A black man. He also was rejected.

All for an old white rich establishment man.

You know, it's almost like they want old white men, with colored women working under him.

 

[TheGreatSatan]

If you're an employer, avoid hiring Democrats at all cost. It will be the best policy you ever have.

 

[Kondor3]

I imagine they feel the same about you.

Here's the real issue, any SCOTUS members not from Harvard or Yale?

That's OK... 13% of the population cannot keep 65-70% of the population on the defensive for very long, as history measures time...

 

[Kondor3]

If you're an employer, avoid hiring Democrats at all cost. It will be the best policy you ever have.

You'll certainly more likely to get an honest day's work out of your people if you avoid that...

 

[Kondor3]

Yes, if I were a business that only hired wealthy black men for twenty five decades.

Next lifetime.... get born into a race that wasn't still sitting at the neolithic hunter-gatherer stage while the best of the world had left that behind ages ago...

 

[Turtlesoup]

You confuse what Republicans are actually doing with Voter ID. Republicans are now trying to limit voting hours and how many days to keep the polls open, along with other methods to decrease voter turnout.

Most states already have Voter ID and it has done fuck-all to stop the types of fraud which occur.

The right is limiting the oportunity for the left to cheat----Time to grow up and take voting seriously---you have to vote where they can verify that your vote isn't fraudulent.

This said, I have notice the left encourages idiots to vote. The fact is that if you are clueless about what is actually going on, that you shouldn't vote at all.

 

[Zincwarrior]

So you’d stay discrimination laws until dark people “catch up”…..effectively applying racism to beat racism?
That really makes sense in WokeTardia?

I am saying it doesn't violate discrimination laws.

 

[Zincwarrior]

Next lifetime.... get born into a race that wasn't still sitting at the neolithic hunter-gatherer stage while the best of the world had left that behind ages ago...

It didn't take women either, or Irish, or Italian until Scalia.

 

[BrokeLoser]

I am saying it doesn't violate discrimination laws.

You should do some due dilligence before speaking on issues foreign to you. Don’t let CNN lead you by the nose.
This is from the almost dead dudes website.

Legal Highlight: The Civil Rights Act of 1964

www.dol.gov

Legal Highlight: The Civil Rights Act of 1964​

In the 1960s, Americans who knew only the potential of "equal protection of the laws" expected the president, the Congress, and the courts to fulfill the promise of the 14th Amendment. In response, all three branches of the federal government--as well as the public at large--debated a fundamental constitutional question: Does the Constitution's prohibition of denying equal protection always ban the use of racial, ethnic, or gender criteria in an attempt to bring social justice and social benefits?
In June 1963, President John Kennedy asked Congress for a comprehensive civil rights bill, induced by massive resistance to desegregation and the murder of Medgar Evers. After Kennedy's assassination in November, President Lyndon Johnson pressed hard, with the support of Roy Wilkins and Clarence Mitchell, to secure the bill's passage the following year. In 1964, Congress passed Public Law 88-352 (78 Stat. 241). The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Provisions of this civil rights act forbade discrimination on the basis of sex, as well as, race in hiring, promoting, and firing. The Act prohibited discrimination in public accommodations and federally funded programs. It also strengthened the enforcement of voting rights and the desegregation of schools.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is the nation's benchmark civil rights legislation, and it continues to resonate in America. Passage of the Act ended the application of "Jim Crow" laws, which had been upheld by the Supreme Court in the 1896 case Plessy v. Ferguson, in which the Court held that racial segregation purported to be "separate but equal" was constitutional. The Civil Rights Act was eventually expanded by Congress to strengthen enforcement of these fundamental civil rights.

 

[BWK]

You confuse voter I.D. with suppression, being the village idiot that you are.

No confusion. Suppression has little to nothing to do with I.D.

 

[BWK]

White men who owned slaves wrote it. That is the primary position of the left. Marcuse was a little more nuanced......minorities were discriminated against therefore whites don't deserve a constitution.

Now on a more practical matter it is what leftist judges find or don't constitutional. Center right judges also fuck up stuff.

That's not an explanation. The Left doesn't want to get rid of it. However, it needs to be inclusive. Thanks for your incorrect answer.

 

[BrokeLoser]

What do our resident “moderates” Mac1958 and Golfing Gator think about the private sector hanging signage that reads “Now Hiring White People”……shouldn’t private enterprises be permitted to operate just the way the Feds do in that regard?

 

[bodecea]

As Biden says the quiet part out loud; “I will only hire a black woman for SCOTUS” you have to wonder if he’d approve of the private sector operating like he does….right?

Qualified white people................there's the struggle.

 

[BWK]

You must have missed the questions posed in the OP…..
Would you support the same practice within the private sector? Would you be okay with businesses hanging signs that read “Now Hiring White People”?
Help us reconcile your position.

I want to see some signs in North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska, Idaho, and Montana recruiting black people back east for executive jobs in their towns. Have you spent time in those states? You talk about some racist mfrs. Dude, you can't afford this conversation, let me tell you.

 

[BWK]

What do our resident “moderates” Mac1958 and Golfing Gator think about the private sector hanging signage that reads “Now Hiring White People”……shouldn’t private enterprises be permitted to operate just the way the Feds do in that regard?

Again, knowing and seeing what's out in some of the badland states, you can't afford this conversation.

 

[BWK]

The left has really nothing to say about equality and advancing minorities. There was two women of color vying to be president. Both were rejected. A black man. He also was rejected.

All for an old white rich establishment man.

You know, it's almost like they want old white men, with colored women working under him.

At least they aren't working in the fields for you, at no pay. The Left has tried to move the needle forward for blacks. Look at what the Right is doing. They're trying to take their right to vote away again.

 

[BWK]

Next lifetime.... get born into a race that wasn't still sitting at the neolithic hunter-gatherer stage while the best of the world had left that behind ages ago...

The best of the world is destroying the world as we speak. With hunter-gatherers, everything went back to the soil. Do no harm in other words. How backward can you get right?

 

[hadit]

I think our government should actually represent our country's makeup.

It hasn't been.

If it really did, there should be a bunch of bare foot, overalled rednecks running around the capital alongside the tofu farters. Just go into a Walmart at 2 am to see what America looks like. Then we would need some gang bangers, both black and Hispanic. Include some Native Americans and there you go.