Not only is the “swastika poster” back….

Status
Not open for further replies.
What wasn't needed is for a forum member to start a thread about him, giving him the attention he so desperately desires and feeds off of.
Unless, of course, the swastika guy was a creation of the finger wagger's own group.

Then it makes perfect sense why a thread would be started to highlight it.

Come on, Aye. You know how some of these cats operate on here. I know you do.

This isn't the first time this same routine has been played out on here. And it's always the same participants.

For whatever reason, some seem to think they're clever, but they're amateurs at best.

The swastika guy character kind of gave up the game when it dared maudes to do something. That was basically just soliciting a prescribed response from you maudes.

Right, Dawg?

It's the pride and naive sense of confidence that gives em away.

Always has been...
 
Last edited:
:rofl:

That's rather paranoid.
 
There's a reason I put this guy on ignore

That's probably the smartest thing you could ever do, two sentence TikTok poster guy.

Because you're playing way, waaaay outta your league tinkering around with me. Heh heh heh...
 
Talking to someone that has you on ignore is wicked smaht. /s

I'm only mentioning that because you seem to have a bit of the 'dunning'.

:eusa_whistle:
 
Dude, Jews are in the middle of attempting to exterminate the Palestinians. That's gonna generate some hate mail.

It also is the same kinda thing anyone with a few active braincells can see coming here against brown people if tRump is allowed to continue his pogroms. So there is a real link between the viewpoints and it's got nothing to do with antisemitism for most folks.

I, for instance, am not antisemitic. I am, however anti Israeli government.
Liar the Israelis could wipe out Gaza in a matter of days if they wanted to kill everyone.
 
Speaking of which..

What is ''our shit?"
Natural Citizen


^Your shit. Static & indeterminate..

For it would seem that you have no shit that is 'our' shit.
 
Shit. We almost have the whole clique in here now. Couple more and we'll have a full house. :laugh:
 
In before the lock,
It came as quite a shock.
While Natty C proposes schlock,
And I respond to his crock.
 
15th post
Unless, of course, the swastika guy was a creation of the finger wagger's own group.

Then it makes perfect sense why a thread would be started to highlight it.

Come on, Aye. You know how some of thse cats operate on here. I know you do.

This isn't the first time this routine has ben played out on here. And it's always the same participants.

For whatever reason, some seem to think they're clever, but they're amateurs at best.

The swastika guy character kind of gave up the game when it dared maudes to do something. That was basically just soliciting a prescribed response from you maudes.

Right, Dawg?

It's the pride and naive sense of confidence that gives em away.

Always has been...
Of course I know the game this particular person is playing. That person is too dense to realize I can play back in ways they aren't capable of thinking about.
 
Shit. We almost have the whole clique in here now. Couple more and we'll have a full house. :laugh:
You're totally not obsessed with the alleged clique that you despise so much that you can't seem to imagine life without it. :dunno:
 
Will not recognize actions as discriminate and distinct from speech. One is free, the other comes with strings attached.

What I see is that you're the one who is so big on free speech that she sees the action of wearing a swastika hat as being speech.

At least that was what I gathered from our discussions.
Do we really need to change the rule to include the word "avatars"?
 
Do we really need to change the rule to include the word "avatars"?

"We"

You're the one with the 'interpretation' and that means you are the one holding the bag.

No, I'm not talking aobut you, Natty. :P
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom