Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Blm didnt confine itself to "murdered" children.......No cops have murdered unarmed black children so far under Trump. Maybe BLM managed to changed things over the last couple years.
No, and neither did the cops.Blm didnt confine itself to "murdered" children.......No cops have murdered unarmed black children so far under Trump. Maybe BLM managed to changed things over the last couple years.
Funny werent they all....or almost all aquitted? They had an opportunity to do some real good as far as deadly force discussion but were goaded into rioting by the Admin.......so far this yr almost 300 have died in confrontations with the policeNo, and neither did the cops.Blm didnt confine itself to "murdered" children.......No cops have murdered unarmed black children so far under Trump. Maybe BLM managed to changed things over the last couple years.
Not likely....without room to destroy they want no part of the consequences. and neither do the behind the scenes agitatorsAs the weather gets warmer....
Maybe BLM read Facebook and Twitter and the op ed section of the paper and realized the rioting was giving them a bad name. Or they ran Antifa out of town.Funny werent they all....or almost all aquitted? They had an opportunity to do some real good as far as deadly force discussion but were goaded into rioting by the Admin.......so far this yr almost 300 have died in confrontations with the policeNo, and neither did the cops.Blm didnt confine itself to "murdered" children.......No cops have murdered unarmed black children so far under Trump. Maybe BLM managed to changed things over the last couple years.
You mean to protect the rights of others. They read fakebook alright......and realized their criminal privilege had been revokedMaybe BLM read Facebook and Twitter and the op ed section of the paper and realized the rioting was giving them a bad name. Or they ran Antifa out of town.Funny werent they all....or almost all aquitted? They had an opportunity to do some real good as far as deadly force discussion but were goaded into rioting by the Admin.......so far this yr almost 300 have died in confrontations with the policeNo, and neither did the cops.Blm didnt confine itself to "murdered" children.......No cops have murdered unarmed black children so far under Trump. Maybe BLM managed to changed things over the last couple years.
Or maybe it's because Republican lawmakers introduce bills to curb protesting in at least 18 states
I don't support destruction of property, so I'm just pointing it out. We need to be careful, though, we don't go too far with this. Like what's happening in Russia right now with Putin throwing all and sundry in jail for protesting because he wouldn't give them a permit to protest. We just don't want to head down that slippery slope.You mean to protect the rights of others. They read fakebook alright......and realized their criminal privilege had been revokedMaybe BLM read Facebook and Twitter and the op ed section of the paper and realized the rioting was giving them a bad name. Or they ran Antifa out of town.Funny werent they all....or almost all aquitted? They had an opportunity to do some real good as far as deadly force discussion but were goaded into rioting by the Admin.......so far this yr almost 300 have died in confrontations with the policeNo, and neither did the cops.Blm didnt confine itself to "murdered" children.......No cops have murdered unarmed black children so far under Trump. Maybe BLM managed to changed things over the last couple years.
Or maybe it's because Republican lawmakers introduce bills to curb protesting in at least 18 states
Most of those were about protesting in traffic were they not......your Russia russia russia comp is a little flat. People were assaulted in their cArs, emergency medical aid was hindered......and so onI don't support destruction of property, so I'm just pointing it out. We need to be careful, though, we don't go too far with this. Like what's happening in Russia right now with Putin throwing all and sundry in jail for protesting because he wouldn't give them a permit to protest. We just don't want to head down that slippery slope.You mean to protect the rights of others. They read fakebook alright......and realized their criminal privilege had been revokedMaybe BLM read Facebook and Twitter and the op ed section of the paper and realized the rioting was giving them a bad name. Or they ran Antifa out of town.Funny werent they all....or almost all aquitted? They had an opportunity to do some real good as far as deadly force discussion but were goaded into rioting by the Admin.......so far this yr almost 300 have died in confrontations with the policeNo, and neither did the cops.Blm didnt confine itself to "murdered" children.......
Or maybe it's because Republican lawmakers introduce bills to curb protesting in at least 18 states
was sworn in? What changed? Oh the humanity and injustice disappeared? Why have they forsaken the oppressed? Fair weather protesters who cut and run simply because they might be prosecuted??? but if their cause is just will they not be aquitted, and if not Brother Martin and Ghandi have shown a trip to jail can energize the public......
What do you mean?I don't support destruction of property, so I'm just pointing it out. We need to be careful, though, we don't go too far with this. Like what's happening in Russia right now with Putin throwing all and sundry in jail for protesting because he wouldn't give them a permit to protest. We just don't want to head down that slippery slope.You mean to protect the rights of others. They read fakebook alright......and realized their criminal privilege had been revokedMaybe BLM read Facebook and Twitter and the op ed section of the paper and realized the rioting was giving them a bad name. Or they ran Antifa out of town.Funny werent they all....or almost all aquitted? They had an opportunity to do some real good as far as deadly force discussion but were goaded into rioting by the Admin.......so far this yr almost 300 have died in confrontations with the policeNo, and neither did the cops.Blm didnt confine itself to "murdered" children.......
Or maybe it's because Republican lawmakers introduce bills to curb protesting in at least 18 states
More "and so on," I think--but article didn't specify. I lived in an area with regular traffic jams; on at least a twice daily basis I was sitting in a parking lot called the Interstate. Emergency vehicles used the shoulder or alternate routes usually. That excuse is bulloney. But it sure sounds good when people can't abide the inconvenience of a traffic tie up on a Saturday morning or whatever. What they really can't abide is the protesters and what they represent.Most of those were about protesting in traffic were they not......your Russia russia russia comp is a little flat. People were assaulted in their cArs, emergency medical aid was hindered......and so onI don't support destruction of property, so I'm just pointing it out. We need to be careful, though, we don't go too far with this. Like what's happening in Russia right now with Putin throwing all and sundry in jail for protesting because he wouldn't give them a permit to protest. We just don't want to head down that slippery slope.You mean to protect the rights of others. They read fakebook alright......and realized their criminal privilege had been revokedMaybe BLM read Facebook and Twitter and the op ed section of the paper and realized the rioting was giving them a bad name. Or they ran Antifa out of town.Funny werent they all....or almost all aquitted? They had an opportunity to do some real good as far as deadly force discussion but were goaded into rioting by the Admin.......so far this yr almost 300 have died in confrontations with the policeNo, and neither did the cops.
Or maybe it's because Republican lawmakers introduce bills to curb protesting in at least 18 states
Not sure how to be more clear here. What is puzzling you?What do you mean?I don't support destruction of property, so I'm just pointing it out. We need to be careful, though, we don't go too far with this. Like what's happening in Russia right now with Putin throwing all and sundry in jail for protesting because he wouldn't give them a permit to protest. We just don't want to head down that slippery slope.You mean to protect the rights of others. They read fakebook alright......and realized their criminal privilege had been revokedMaybe BLM read Facebook and Twitter and the op ed section of the paper and realized the rioting was giving them a bad name. Or they ran Antifa out of town.Funny werent they all....or almost all aquitted? They had an opportunity to do some real good as far as deadly force discussion but were goaded into rioting by the Admin.......so far this yr almost 300 have died in confrontations with the policeNo, and neither did the cops.
Or maybe it's because Republican lawmakers introduce bills to curb protesting in at least 18 states
It was clear to me. I was just wondering why my interpretation actually bothered you.. You like statism some of the time. Why not shut out opposition? That just goes along with your enjoying illegal surveillance and activism in our court systemNot sure how to be more clear here. What is puzzling you?What do you mean?I don't support destruction of property, so I'm just pointing it out. We need to be careful, though, we don't go too far with this. Like what's happening in Russia right now with Putin throwing all and sundry in jail for protesting because he wouldn't give them a permit to protest. We just don't want to head down that slippery slope.You mean to protect the rights of others. They read fakebook alright......and realized their criminal privilege had been revokedMaybe BLM read Facebook and Twitter and the op ed section of the paper and realized the rioting was giving them a bad name. Or they ran Antifa out of town.Funny werent they all....or almost all aquitted? They had an opportunity to do some real good as far as deadly force discussion but were goaded into rioting by the Admin.......so far this yr almost 300 have died in confrontations with the police
Or maybe it's because Republican lawmakers introduce bills to curb protesting in at least 18 states
Not baloney at all its verified incidents.......well at least they sold lots of t-shirts.....More "and so on," I think--but article didn't specify. I lived in an area with regular traffic jams; on at least a twice daily basis I was sitting in a parking lot called the Interstate. Emergency vehicles used the shoulder or alternate routes usually. That excuse is bulloney. But it sure sounds good when people can't abide the inconvenience of a traffic tie up on a Saturday morning or whatever. What they really can't abide is the protesters and what they represent.Most of those were about protesting in traffic were they not......your Russia russia russia comp is a little flat. People were assaulted in their cArs, emergency medical aid was hindered......and so onI don't support destruction of property, so I'm just pointing it out. We need to be careful, though, we don't go too far with this. Like what's happening in Russia right now with Putin throwing all and sundry in jail for protesting because he wouldn't give them a permit to protest. We just don't want to head down that slippery slope.You mean to protect the rights of others. They read fakebook alright......and realized their criminal privilege had been revokedMaybe BLM read Facebook and Twitter and the op ed section of the paper and realized the rioting was giving them a bad name. Or they ran Antifa out of town.Funny werent they all....or almost all aquitted? They had an opportunity to do some real good as far as deadly force discussion but were goaded into rioting by the Admin.......so far this yr almost 300 have died in confrontations with the police
Or maybe it's because Republican lawmakers introduce bills to curb protesting in at least 18 states
Your interpretation didn't bother me; I agreed with it. As for the rest of it, bugger all if I don't fit into your pigeon hole.It was clear to me. I was just wondering why my interpretation actually bothered you.. You like statism some of the time. Why not shut out opposition? That just goes along with your enjoying illegal surveillance and activism in our court systemNot sure how to be more clear here. What is puzzling you?What do you mean?I don't support destruction of property, so I'm just pointing it out. We need to be careful, though, we don't go too far with this. Like what's happening in Russia right now with Putin throwing all and sundry in jail for protesting because he wouldn't give them a permit to protest. We just don't want to head down that slippery slope.You mean to protect the rights of others. They read fakebook alright......and realized their criminal privilege had been revokedMaybe BLM read Facebook and Twitter and the op ed section of the paper and realized the rioting was giving them a bad name. Or they ran Antifa out of town.
Or maybe it's because Republican lawmakers introduce bills to curb protesting in at least 18 states
Just questioning consistencyYour interpretation didn't bother me; I agreed with it. As for the rest of it, bugger all if I don't fit into your pigeon hole.It was clear to me. I was just wondering why my interpretation actually bothered you.. You like statism some of the time. Why not shut out opposition? That just goes along with your enjoying illegal surveillance and activism in our court systemNot sure how to be more clear here. What is puzzling you?What do you mean?I don't support destruction of property, so I'm just pointing it out. We need to be careful, though, we don't go too far with this. Like what's happening in Russia right now with Putin throwing all and sundry in jail for protesting because he wouldn't give them a permit to protest. We just don't want to head down that slippery slope.You mean to protect the rights of others. They read fakebook alright......and realized their criminal privilege had been revoked
The problem with consistency, sometimes, is that in order to be philosophically pure, you have to give up common sense. I know you don't like that, but as far as I'm concerned, honoring pure logic is worthless if it ends up causing more harm.Just questioning consistencyYour interpretation didn't bother me; I agreed with it. As for the rest of it, bugger all if I don't fit into your pigeon hole.It was clear to me. I was just wondering why my interpretation actually bothered you.. You like statism some of the time. Why not shut out opposition? That just goes along with your enjoying illegal surveillance and activism in our court systemNot sure how to be more clear here. What is puzzling you?What do you mean?I don't support destruction of property, so I'm just pointing it out. We need to be careful, though, we don't go too far with this. Like what's happening in Russia right now with Putin throwing all and sundry in jail for protesting because he wouldn't give them a permit to protest. We just don't want to head down that slippery slope.
