Noem confuses a constitutional right with its abuse. Imagine my surprise.

[odanny]

A refresher for our conservative friends, representatives, congressmembers, cabinet secretaries, and President:


AI Overview
Learn more

Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution addresses the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus. It states that this privilege cannot be suspended unless during times of rebellion or invasion when the public safety requires it. The writ of habeas corpus is a legal tool that allows a person to challenge their detention, ensuring they cannot be held in jail without legitimate charges.

Elaboration:

• Habeas Corpus:
  The writ of habeas corpus protects individuals from indefinite detention without legal justification. It allows a person to be brought before a court to determine the legality of their imprisonment.
  
  
• • Suspension:
    Clause 2 allows for the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus in specific circumstances: cases of rebellion or invasion when the public safety is at risk.
  • Public Safety:
    The clause emphasizes the need for a genuine threat to public safety to justify suspending the writ.
  • Examples of Suspension:
    The writ of habeas corpus has been suspended during the Civil War and in the context of the War on Terror, particularly regarding detainees held at Guantanamo Bay.
  • Historical Context:
    The clause reflects a concern for individual liberty and the need for legal process in cases of detention, even during times of crisis

 

[Paradoxical#1]

I'll bet she at least knows what Habeus Corpus is.

I bet she doesn't. Unlike Noem, Commyla can only cackle like a teenager to questions. Kristi Noem never was an attorney so not readily knowing about Habeus Corpus is no big deal. In any event, she is like Einstein compared to Commyla.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Thats cool but has literally nothing to do with basic knowledge or the topic.

Then stay on topic. You’re the one that wanted to talk about embarrassing.

 

[JimH52]

A refresher for our conservative friends, representatives, congressmembers, cabinet secretaries, and President:


AI Overview
Learn more

Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution addresses the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus. It states that this privilege cannot be suspended unless during times of rebellion or invasion when the public safety requires it. The writ of habeas corpus is a legal tool that allows a person to challenge their detention, ensuring they cannot be held in jail without legitimate charges.

Elaboration:

• Habeas Corpus:
  The writ of habeas corpus protects individuals from indefinite detention without legal justification. It allows a person to be brought before a court to determine the legality of their imprisonment.
  
  
• • Suspension:
    Clause 2 allows for the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus in specific circumstances: cases of rebellion or invasion when the public safety is at risk.
  • Public Safety:
    The clause emphasizes the need for a genuine threat to public safety to justify suspending the writ.
  • Examples of Suspension:
    The writ of habeas corpus has been suspended during the Civil War and in the context of the War on Terror, particularly regarding detainees held at Guantanamo Bay.
  • Historical Context:
    The clause reflects a concern for individual liberty and the need for legal process in cases of detention, even during times of crisis

The trump regime is there to serve the Dear Leader. Noem's testimony proved she is only loyal to trump.

 

[Lesh]

Noem says Trump can deport who he wants, botches what ‘habeas corpus’ means​

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Tuesday that President Donald Trump has an absolute right to deport people without due process, after she incorrectly defined the meaning of the term habeas corpus.

Noem was grilled on habeas corpus — the constitutional right of individuals to challenge their detention by the government in a court of law — during the Senate hearing.

“Secretary Noem, what is habeas corpus?” asked Sen. Maggie Hassan, D-N.H.

“Well, habeas corpus is a constitutional right that the president has to be able to remove people from this country,” Noem replied.

“That’s incorrect,” Hassan interjected. “Habeas corpus is the foundational right that separates free societies like America from police states like North Korea.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/05/20/kristi-noem-habeas-corpus-immigration.html

Don't feel too badly Kristi. Hardly anyone in the regime understands the concept.

Holy shit

I mean

Holy shit

 

[Lesh]

I don’t see her being in error
I do see libs extrapolating what she said into something they can lie and cry about

You “see” with your eyes closed then

 

[MagicMike]

Habeas Corpus- that thing illegals have no constitutional right to.

The U.S. Constitution disagrees with you.

 

[MagicMike]

That's ok, she isn't a judge now is she.

Listen to some of the losers Joey bribem nominated to the Courts.

They didn't know even the basics.

THAT matters.

Not hers.

Your addiction to whataboutism is commical. Keep up the entertainment Simp.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

The point is not that she made "verbal blunder", but that she should have a better idea of what habeas corpus and due process mean because they are so utterly essential to a republic.

Veggie *Joe should have had a better understanding of “you know the thing”.

 

[westwall]

She swore to uphold the Constitution of the United States, and did not take an oath of allegiance to a President.

YES, she is to deny the President if he tells her to do something unconstitutional... THAT WAS HER OATH OF OFFICE that she took.

And there are government lawyers to make sure she does.

 

[westwall]

Your addiction to whataboutism is commical. Keep up the entertainment Simp.

It's not a whataboutism, moron. She doesn't control a Court. Judges do. Judges ARE supposed to know the basics.

KBJ doesn't.

 

[struth]

The U.S. Constitution disagrees with you.

The Constitution doesn’t say it’s a right for anyone

 

[Paradoxical#1]

A refresher for our conservative friends, representatives, congressmembers, cabinet secretaries, and President:


AI Overview
Learn more

Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution addresses the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus. It states that this privilege cannot be suspended unless during times of rebellion or invasion when the public safety requires it. The writ of habeas corpus is a legal tool that allows a person to challenge their detention, ensuring they cannot be held in jail without legitimate charges.

Elaboration:

• Habeas Corpus:
  The writ of habeas corpus protects individuals from indefinite detention without legal justification. It allows a person to be brought before a court to determine the legality of their imprisonment.
  
  
• • Suspension:
    Clause 2 allows for the suspension of the writ of habeas corpus in specific circumstances: cases of rebellion or invasion when the public safety is at risk.
  • Public Safety:
    The clause emphasizes the need for a genuine threat to public safety to justify suspending the writ.
  • Examples of Suspension:
    The writ of habeas corpus has been suspended during the Civil War and in the context of the War on Terror, particularly regarding detainees held at Guantanamo Bay.
  • Historical Context:
    The clause reflects a concern for individual liberty and the need for legal process in cases of detention, even during times of crisis

You seemed to have missed this part:

unless during times of rebellion or invasion when the public safety requires it.

PS. I hope this helps. We were invaded through the actions of Mayorkass and Biden with millions and our safety requires it.

 

[buckeye]

I avoided nothing. I am not trying to defend what the Biden administration did. I was clear, it's all a national embarrassment.

But having a Homeland Security Secretary repeatedly insisting that our border was secure while illegals, including gang members and criminals from all over the world poured across it wasn't?

 

[Lesh]

The Constitution doesn’t say it’s a right for anyone

Habeas corpus?

It certainly does

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

So, you hold republicans feet to the fire over a 'mistake', but overlook your own party's
failure to uphold the Constitution? Your hypocrisy is in full bloom, Care.

.


Whining little leftist weasels who believe everything their TV's tell them they must believe.


.

 

[JimH52]

Holy shit

I mean

Holy shit

I had to listen to her response several times. It is like, screw the Constitution. It is all about trump.

 

[pknopp]

I bet she doesn't. Unlike Noem, Commyla can only cackle like a teenager to questions. Kristi Noem never was an attorney so not readily knowing about Habeus Corpus is no big deal. In any event, she is like Einstein compared to Commyla.

It is a big deal.

 

[pknopp]

But having a Homeland Security Secretary repeatedly insisting that our border was secure while illegals, including gang members and criminals from all over the world poured across it wasn't?

Again, the difference is I am not nor have I ever defended that.

I've noted many times that it hurt the Dems bad.

 

[Nostra]

Can’t violate the constitution if you don’t know what it says!

Huh?