- Dec 7, 2012
- Reaction score
I know, right? That's why I'm always correcting y'all. If y'all grokked me I could be outta here by now.What you think.....and others see are far different, Pogo....just an observationAgain --- thought I told you this --- I am ilk-free. You can call me Ilkless.I probably just missed ALL of your posts chastising your ilk for doing it. I stand corrected.My "ilk"?According to your ilk, yes...it is one sided. Don't do much reading of the posts on this board, do you?Are you under the
impression illusionhallucination that aligning with some political party imparts some kind of personality trait? :You're saying this resigning state rep is the same as Billy Graham?
Wow dood. Composition Fallacy much? This is the kind of shit that keeps discourse in the fucking gutter.
Way to aim high. Stay classy and shit.
If you did, I'm sure you would be chastising them also......
I have no "ilk" laddie. I am sui generis.
And I sure as phuque don't engage in Composition Fallacies. Feel free to prove me wrong.
Point stands, judgement is for the plaintiff.
What is it with summa y'all clowns where you hate the idea of individuality and have to lump disparate people together?
Is it just too much work to assess the personal? Do y'all just honestly NOT KNOW what a Sweeping Generalization Fallacy is?