No one is getting a $2000 check or refund

[shockedcanadian]

But you can keep the check and still cash it.

How? It would have to be confirmed as commissioned, right?

I havent used cheques in a long time so perhaps I'm not up to date.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Thats not a bad idea

But not quite as good as reducing the defecit

I wonder how the father of Laken Riley or Rachel Morin would like to see the money spent?
Like myself, I bet he’s be good with bumping the debt to $80T if it meant we all wake up tomorrow to no brown parasites in our country.

 

[Mac-7]

I wonder how the father of Laken Riley or Rachel Morin would like to see the money spent?
Like myself, I bet he’s be good with bumping the debt to $80T if it meant we all wake up tomorrow to no brown parasites in our country.

If they spend it on border enforcement I would not complain

There is more than one way to skin a cat

 

[Edgetho]

The Grateful Poor
Henry Ossawa Tanner

 

[Seymour Flops]

Why would you think some Republicans wouldn’t join the opposition?

What, RINO's you mean? Rand Paul, for example?

They might, I guess. In in that case, they will not get the benefit of the voters' anger at Democrats for blocking this payment.

The voters will think, 'what is this bullshit? Democrats and "not Democrats" spend money like drunken sailors, but they blocked this because it would actually help ordinary people?'

 

[initforme]

Thered be zeto economic consequences for a lousy 2000 per person

 

[MarcATL]

lol

 

[Mr Natural]

Thered be zeto economic consequences for a lousy 2000 per person

Assuming that the money is going to taxpayers, we're talking like $300,000,000,000.

You don't think that might have some economic consequences?

 

[Dekster]

Let’s be clear. Donald Trump promised a $2000 dividend.

That could mean two things, in both scenarios you ain’t getting no check or refund.

Scenario 1) Donald Trump actually means a check, in the sense that most people probably interpreted Trump‘s promise in social media.
Or a refund if you choose to receive the funds electronically. In this scenario, Trump lied because he does not know for sure that this money will be approved by Congress, which would require 60 votes in the Senate. And the barriers are too strong. Not passing for sure.

Scenario #2: Trump was being slick and he actually meant some bullshit life, “I meant the money from the tax cuts already passed in the big beautiful Bill”. Treasury Secretary Bessent already took care of that part by saying that this may be how people will get the money.

In this second scenario, of course you’re not getting a check or refund.

Just making sure you’re not making any plans with these free $2000.

What Trump is doing is projecting to the Supreme Court an argument that if they declare his tariffs illegal, the government should get to still keep the money it has collected already instead of going through a protracted process of tracking down who paid it and refunding it to them on a case by case basis.

 

[Lesh]

Trump didn't promise anything, he proposed an idea.
1. We'll see how congress reacts to the tariff rebate idea. At $38T in debt doubtful.
2. Calling the tax cuts, tips, OT, and SS a dividend isn't what I heard at the news conference, he specifically said tariff revenue.

I also think its doubtful, unless Trump makes a deal with democrats to pass all the Appropriations Bills for a $2,000 rebate from tariff revenue to offset healthcare insurance premiums, but the GOP senate won't go along they want the ACA dead.

Look for another shutdown after J31st.

So no check

Just more Trump bullshit

 

[Independent thinker]

Let’s be clear. Donald Trump promised a $2000 dividend.

That could mean two things, in both scenarios you ain’t getting no check or refund.

Scenario 1) Donald Trump actually means a check, in the sense that most people probably interpreted Trump‘s promise in social media.
Or a refund if you choose to receive the funds electronically. In this scenario, Trump lied because he does not know for sure that this money will be approved by Congress, which would require 60 votes in the Senate. And the barriers are too strong. Not passing for sure.

Scenario #2: Trump was being slick and he actually meant some bullshit life, “I meant the money from the tax cuts already passed in the big beautiful Bill”. Treasury Secretary Bessent already took care of that part by saying that this may be how people will get the money.

In this second scenario, of course you’re not getting a check or refund.

Just making sure you’re not making any plans with these free $2000.

Translation: Trump is winning at virtually everything so let's attack him over the only thing we can - something that hasn't even happened yet.

 

[whitehall]

It could mean anything so why not wait and see? Of course lefties and pretend conservatives prefer to assume the worst and turn it into a lame political issue.

 

[Billiejeens]

“A dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone,” he added.

Sounds a lot more like a promise than a proposal to me.

Because you're incredibly stupid

 

[Delldude]

“A dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone,” he added.

Sounds a lot more like a promise than a proposal to me.

Like your selective editing.

Trump Again Floats Idea of Giving $2,000 to Most Americans. Here’s What to Know

What exactly is Trump proposing and where would the dividend come from?

When has Trump previously floated this idea?

What challenges could Trump encounter, according to experts?

Is Trump Giving Out $2000 to Americans? Here’s What We Know

This isn’t the first time Trump has floated the idea of paying some kind of stimulus check or tax rebate to Americans.

time.com

 

[Billiejeens]

Thats not a bad idea

But not quite as good as reducing the defecit

Expanding succesful ICE operations goals have the effect of lowering the deficient.
Maybe exponentially.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Assuming that the money is going to taxpayers, we're talking like $300,000,000,000.

You don't think that might have some economic consequences?

Are you including people whose incomes are so low that they owe very little taxes and get "refundable tax credits," that cover what they owe and even provide them a refund of money thst they never paid in the first place as "taxpayers?"

In 2022, that was nearly a third (31%) of tax filers.

 

[Marener]

Like your selective editing.

I literally quoted his own words.

When someone says something “will” happen, they’re not really floating an idea.

But by now we all know that Trump just say shit and no one takes it seriously.

 

[Delldude]

I literally quoted his own words.

When someone says something “will” happen, they’re not really floating an idea.

But by now we all know that Trump just say shit and no one takes it seriously.

Yeah especially when you cherry pick His words.

 

[Marener]

Yeah especially when you cherry pick His words.

Stop trolling.

 

[Delldude]

Stop trolling.

Post the article.