No More Debates

[ThisIsMe]

kamala said she was open to more debates AFTER the first one. donny wanted to change it up & have the fox one be b4 ABC, but he caved. & the very same day that she said at her rally she wanted more, was the day donny turned tail & said no more.

poor losing loser donny....................

lol, the fox debate was proposed several weeks ago, Harris has yet to accept, but I’m sure she will be happy to have one on cnn or msnbc.

She should just come out and accept trumps offer for a Fox debate.

Won’t happen though.

Face it, twice now, Trump has called their bluff and debated them in unfriendly territory, while harris runs away from anything that is not friendly to her

Its ok, we all see it, we all know, including you, thought you won’t admit it.

 

[ThisIsMe]

What is there to accept? Trump has stated that he is no longer going to debate.

By the way and for your knowledge, you are exhausting your chances of me having any interest in debating with you. You offer no debate, just comebacks that only criticize but don't offer a rebuttal of the information given. The reality is that you are acting as a clown and the worst part is that you are not funny at all!

What is there to accept? Trump has stated that he is no longer going to debate.

The Fox debate was proposed weeks ago, she dodged it. Why didn’t she accept it then? I think we all know why.

By the way and for your knowledge, you are exhausting your chances of me having any interest in debating with you

ok..so then just stop replying…

You offer no debate

On the contrary, I offer sound and reasonable arguments to your point. I think I have offered ample debate.

just comebacks that only criticize but don't offer a rebuttal of the information given

I’ve only pointed out that you claim to be focused on data and facts, but appear to only be interested in one side of those facts, dismissing the rest, which is fine. I’m not sure what “come backs” you are referring to. What information do you feel requires rebuttal? Our discussions have been mostly focused on your assertions that you are after stats, data, and facts, which I point out that your approach is one of bias, which skews your facts and data.

The reality is that you are acting as a clown and the worst part is that you are not funny at all!

I’ve never intended to be humorous in our discussion, so the fact that I’m not funny is unsurprising

 

[Luckyone]

ok..so then just stop replying…

The only good point you've made since we started talking

On the contrary, I offer sound and reasonable arguments to your point. I think I have offered ample debate.

BS but I know you believe it.

I’ve only pointed out that you claim to be focused on data and facts, but appear to only be interested in one side of those facts, dismissing the rest, which is fine. I’m not sure what “come backs” you are referring to. What information do you feel requires rebuttal? Our discussions have been mostly focused on your assertions that you are after stats, data, and facts, which I point out that your approach is one of bias, which skews your facts and data.

More BS

I’ve never intended to be humorous in our discussion, so the fact that I’m not funny is unsurprising

I know but that doesn't stop you from looking like a clown.

Anyhow, I will follow your suggestion. For that, I thank you for giving it to me.

 

[mudwhistle]

The Fox debate was proposed weeks ago, she dodged it. Why didn’t she accept it then? I think we all know why.



ok..so then just stop replying…



On the contrary, I offer sound and reasonable arguments to your point. I think I have offered ample debate.



I’ve only pointed out that you claim to be focused on data and facts, but appear to only be interested in one side of those facts, dismissing the rest, which is fine. I’m not sure what “come backs” you are referring to. What information do you feel requires rebuttal? Our discussions have been mostly focused on your assertions that you are after stats, data, and facts, which I point out that your approach is one of bias, which skews your facts and data.



I’ve never intended to be humorous in our discussion, so the fact that I’m not funny is unsurprising

 

[dudmuck]

The Fox debate was proposed weeks ago, she dodged it. Why didn’t she accept it then? I think we all know why.



ok..so then just stop replying…



On the contrary, I offer sound and reasonable arguments to your point. I think I have offered ample debate.



I’ve only pointed out that you claim to be focused on data and facts, but appear to only be interested in one side of those facts, dismissing the rest, which is fine. I’m not sure what “come backs” you are referring to. What information do you feel requires rebuttal? Our discussions have been mostly focused on your assertions that you are after stats, data, and facts, which I point out that your approach is one of bias, which skews your facts and data.



I’ve never intended to be humorous in our discussion, so the fact that I’m not funny is unsurprising

Trump's 'pitch' is for a Fox News sponsored rally in an arena filled with Trump supporters, with a prohibition on fact checking. Seriously, that was his 'offer'.
Fox news has credibility issues.

 

[ThisIsMe]

The only good point you've made since we started talking

BS but I know you believe it.


More BS


I know but that doesn't stop you from looking like a clown.

Anyhow, I will follow your suggestion. For that, I thank you for giving it to me.

lol, when you can’t argue the points, resort to insult? Oh well..

 

[ThisIsMe]

Trump's 'pitch' is for a Fox News sponsored rally in an arena filled with Trump supporters, with a prohibition on fact checking. Seriously, that was his 'offer'.
Fox news has credibility issues.

I don’t recall him saying any of that. You lefty’s made all that up.

The rules for the debate never materialized because harris never accepted it. Just face it, she’s willing to only debate where she has an advantage. Trump has met on democrats terms twice now, and Harris even tried to change the rules of the already agreed upon debate.

 

[Luckyone]

lol, when you can’t argue the points, resort to insult? Oh well..

You have yet to debate as debate is about proving your points with data, statistics and facts. You try to do it with words and words mean nothing if not supported.

and for your information, calling Bullshit Bullshit is not an insult. Bullshit is bullshit. Saying you are an idiot for spreading bullshit is an insult but I did not do that. I just pointed out that the words you use are not supported with facts

 

[Dragonlady]

Trump is right. Why should there be? He crushed both debates. Even with it being three against one on Tuesday night.

Redirect Notice

www.google.com

Trump is too chicken to get his ass kicked again - by a woman!!!

Instead, he's making up shit about ear pieces in her earings, and getting questions in advance. The second being ridiculous because there were no special or trick questions. "What are your policies on - abortion, climate change, law and order, the border?" Other than what I've posted, what did they ask her?

Like all good lawyers, she went into the debate with facts, figures and talking points, but it was her skill as a debater which allowed her to marshall her facts, figures and policy points and to dominate her weaker and ill-prepared opponent.

All Trump had was lies, lies, and more lies.

 

[Dragonlady]

I don’t recall him saying any of that. You lefty’s made all that up.

The rules for the debate never materialized because harris never accepted it. Just face it, she’s willing to only debate where she has an advantage. Trump has met on democrats terms twice now, and Harris even tried to change the rules of the already agreed upon debate.

Poor Donnie. Bullied by the Democrats. Forced to do things their way.

Who's fault is it that Trump was unprepared? Who's fault is it that Trump lied all the way through the debate? Who's fault is it that Trump's platform failed the first time and he has nothing new?

 

[ThisIsMe]

You have yet to debate as debate is about proving your points with data, statistics and facts. You try to do it with words and words mean nothing if not supported.

and for your information, calling Bullshit Bullshit is not an insult. Bullshit is bullshit. Saying you are an idiot for spreading bullshit is an insult but I did not do that. I just pointed out that the words you use are not supported with facts

I asked you, what points that we have been discussing do you feel needs data? You and I haven’t really talked about any issue in particular. We’ve only been discussing data and biases in the media. Ive made the point that not looking at the full picture skews your data, and that you appear to not be wanting to look at all the data, just that which comports to your agenda.

Those are all just observations based on things you’ve said. So, what point that has been brought up do you feel I need to prove?

 

[ThisIsMe]

Poor Donnie. Bullied by the Democrats. Forced to do things their way.

Who's fault is it that Trump was unprepared? Who's fault is it that Trump lied all the way through the debate? Who's fault is it that Trump's platform failed the first time and he has nothing new?

Do you have any comments on the topic we were discussing? Like why Harris is still running from a Fox debate and why she appears to only want to do debates on her terms with advantage to her? Got anything to say about that?

 

[Dragonlady]

Do you have any comments on the topic we were discussing? Like why Harris is still running from a Fox debate and why she appears to only want to do debates on her terms with advantage to her? Got anything to say about that?

Bitter much????

Harris isn't "running" from a FOX debate. The Democrats have stated from the start of the election campaign that they will not debate on FOX because of the $875 million dollar slander settlement paid by FOX for lying about the 2020 election.

Any debate that Harris participates in is going to be to her advantage because she'll arrived well prepared, with facts at hand, and she's an excellent debater. Trump is the guy who said he didn't need to prepare and showed up with lies, conspiracy theories, and no plans for the nation.

 

[Luckyone]

I asked you, what points that we have been discussing do you feel needs data? You and I haven’t really talked about any issue in particular. We’ve only been discussing data and biases in the media. Ive made the point that not looking at the full picture skews your data, and that you appear to not be wanting to look at all the data, just that which comports to your agenda.

Those are all just observations based on things you’ve said. So, what point that has been brought up do you feel I need to prove?

Look, I truly love to debate but I am a data, statistics, facts person. What I have done for the past 47 years and what I do now to make a living is based exclusively on those three. As such, words are totally meaningless to me. Everyone has an opinion and everyone thinks they are right but reality is that is impossible.

You have done a lot or words (and I do mean a lot) but up to now ON ALL TOPICS, you have yet to provide facts, data, and statistics to support your words. I get tired and bored of words. We can all say whatever we want to but life is harsh enough that if you do not approach it with truth, life will kill you.

As such, if you want to continue conversations between us, make your point and give supporting data that could prove your point to be true. Stop asking questions as your main topic of conversation. I can easily prove my points but to do that with a person that all they do is question what I say and provide nothing of their own, gets tiresome and boring and I have better things to do with my time than to spend it going nowhere.

End of story. You now know what I require of you to continue talking to each other.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Bitter much????

Harris isn't "running" from a FOX debate. The Democrats have stated from the start of the election campaign that they will not debate on FOX because of the $875 million dollar slander settlement paid by FOX for lying about the 2020 election.

Any debate that Harris participates in is going to be to her advantage because she'll arrived well prepared, with facts at hand, and she's an excellent debater. Trump is the guy who said he didn't need to prepare and showed up with lies, conspiracy theories, and no plans for the nation.

Bitter? Who’s bitter? I just asked you a question. If you took it as bitterness, that’s on you

The Democrats have stated from the start of the election campaign that they will not debate on FOX because of the $875 million dollar slander settlement paid by FOX for lying about the 2020 election.

Where did they say that? Sounds like an excuse.

Trump has a lawsuit against an abc host, that didn’t seem to stop them from hosting a debate with Trump.

Also, the lawsuit isn’t between Fox and the dnc, it’s between Fox and dominion.

Any debate that Harris participates in is going to be to her advantage because she'll arrived well prepared, with facts at hand, and she's an excellent debater. Trump is the guy who said he didn't need to prepare and showed up with lies, conspiracy theories, and no plans for the nation.

Have you seen Harris outside of a scripted, rehearsed interview? The accusation of word salad has a reason.

Her advantage is because the venues they debate in will fact check trump but not Harris, they will structure questions to be more of an attack on Trump, and take toward Harris.


Again, a Fox debate offer is on the table, if Harris agrees, I’m sure Trump would do it..the question is, will Harris accept? Likely not.

 

[ThisIsMe]

Look, I truly love to debate but I am a data, statistics, facts person. What I have done for the past 47 years and what I do now to make a living is based exclusively on those three. As such, words are totally meaningless to me. Everyone has an opinion and everyone thinks they are right but reality is that is impossible.

You have done a lot or words (and I do mean a lot) but up to now ON ALL TOPICS, you have yet to provide facts, data, and statistics to support your words. I get tired and bored of words. We can all say whatever we want to but life is harsh enough that if you do not approach it with truth, life will kill you.

As such, if you want to continue conversations between us, make your point and give supporting data that could prove your point to be true. Stop asking questions as your main topic of conversation. I can easily prove my points but to do that with a person that all they do is question what I say and provide nothing of their own, gets tiresome and boring and I have better things to do with my time than to spend it going nowhere.

End of story. You now know what I require of you to continue talking to each other.

Look, I truly love to debate but I am a data, statistics, facts person

You are only fact based as far as what suits your agenda. Through our conversation, I think we’ve established that you are a fairly biased person. Nothing wrong with that, but it is what it is. Because of this, your data is generally skewed as biases tend to cause one to omit some facts that don’t line up with your bias.

You have done a lot or words (and I do mean a lot) but up to now ON ALL TOPICS, you have yet to provide facts, data, and statistics to support your words

My facts and data are your own words. We have several of pages if data and facts. Beyond that, we haven’t discussed any topic of politics that requires me to prove anything, so I’m not sure what you are expecting.

I get tired and bored of words. We can all say whatever we want to but life is harsh enough that if you do not approach it with truth, life will kill you.

See above..

make your point and give supporting data that could prove your point to be true

I’ve made my point, several times, using the data and facts that you have made available through the course of our conversation.

Stop asking questions as your main topic of conversation. I can easily prove my points but to do that with a person that all they do is question what I say and provide nothing of their own, gets tiresome and boring and I have better things to do with my time than to spend it going nowhere.

The only question I have is, outside of what we have talked about, what points are you wanting me to clarify?

You now know what I require of you to continue talking to each other.

Once again, I’ve addressed all of my points in this conversation, I’m not sure what else you are talking about.

 

[Luckyone]

You are only fact based as far as what suits your agenda. Through our conversation, I think we’ve established that you are a fairly biased person. Nothing wrong with that, but it is what it is. Because of this, your data is generally skewed as biases tend to cause one to omit some facts that don’t line up with your bias.

Established that I am biased? against whom? Trump? There is no bias there as I am not against the politics but against the man and that is because he is immoral, unethical, unprincipled and inhumane and given that it has been proven he is all of that, there is no bias involved

My facts and data are your own words. We have several of pages if data and facts. Beyond that, we haven’t discussed any topic of politics that requires me to prove anything, so I’m not sure what you are expecting.

Wow, this OP is about Harris and the debates. You stated, that Harris did not want to debate and I asked you to prove. You didn't. As such, right there it is you that is not showing proof and just using words.

I’ve made my point, several times, using the data and facts that you have made available through the course of our conversation.

You have not proven anything as far as debates are concerned. Show me where Kamala has stated she does not want to debate Trump or even debate him on FOX. You have said it BUT NOT PROVEN IT.

The only question I have is, outside of what we have talked about, what points are you wanting me to clarify?

Prove that Kamala does not want to debate.

Once again, I’ve addressed all of my points in this conversation, I’m not sure what else you are talking about.

You never stop do you..........................all words

 

[Dragonlady]

Bitter? Who’s bitter? I just asked you a question. If you took it as bitterness, that’s on you



Where did they say that? Sounds like an excuse.

Trump has a lawsuit against an abc host, that didn’t seem to stop them from hosting a debate with Trump.

Also, the lawsuit isn’t between Fox and the dnc, it’s between Fox and dominion.



Have you seen Harris outside of a scripted, rehearsed interview? The accusation of word salad has a reason.

Her advantage is because the venues they debate in will fact check trump but not Harris, they will structure questions to be more of an attack on Trump, and take toward Harris.


Again, a Fox debate offer is on the table, if Harris agrees, I’m sure Trump would do it..the question is, will Harris accept? Likely not.

Denial is not just a river in Egypt. Your entire post was bitter and angry about the results of the debate and the unfairness of it all. The accusation that she was given the questions, and the refusal to accept that Trump was unprepared and incapable of speaking about anything without lying about it.

Democrats said from day one they would not debate on FOX because FOX deliberately LIED about the results of the 2020 election, which was proven by the Dominion law suit, and admitted in the emails between staffers and management.

You seem to be mentally challenged when it comes to discussing FOX News and their basic dishonesty and lies.

Trump could solve the "fact-check problem" by NOT LYING. It's a really fucking simple solution. STOP LYING. What questions did you consider to be "attacks on Trump". Are you suggesting that Trump shouldn't have to answer for his administrations record on January 6th, covid, or the crashed economy????

Have I seen Harris outside of scripted interview - yes I have. Numerous times. She was my pick in 2020 based on her record, her experience and what I saw of her in interviews, and in Senate hearing. You could find all of this stuff too because it's all on YouTube, but you don't bother.

There is no FOX debate on the table - not before Harris became candidate and not after. FOX is not a news network. They have paid out over a billion dollars for lying to the American people.

Trump lost the debate. Now he's refusing to do another. Trump is a coward and a bully, and he lost BIGLY.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]

I don't need to see the debate…I've been to the grocery store, the gas station, paid electric bills, car insurance, etc for the last 7 years . I know the difference and YOU do too. The debate is over.

 

[Freedomisneverfree]