But wait. This isn’t about whether it’s effective.
Yawn. I've shown the studies of cheap drugs used in many places of this world that would negate the use of a dang LEAKY VACCINE.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Most have Natural Immunity in this country. They need a study on THAT. Which actually trains all parts of the body and not a single protein that we have NO CLUE the long term effects.
Have you accepted St. Fauxi, Lord of Science, as your Savior?
You mean like this study which shows no effect?
jamanetwork.com
bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com
www.mdpi.com
www.researchsquare.com
not one, why do you think I keep asking?
nope, if it was working, you wouldn't need booster shots. you are a demofk through and though ain't you?
I knew you would do that. Many show no effect and many show effect. You CHERRY PICK DATA I GAVE YOU. I understood that you would do thisYou mean like this study which shows no effect?
Effect of Ivermectin on Time to Resolution of Symptoms Among Adults With Mild COVID-19
This randomized trial compares the effects of ivermectin vs placebo on time to symptom resolution within 21 days among patients with mild COVID-19.
Or this study which showed no effect?
Ivermectin to prevent hospitalizations in patients with COVID-19 (IVERCOR-COVID19) a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial - BMC Infectious Diseases
Background Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) has changed our lives. The scientific community has been investigating re-purposed treatments to prevent disease progression in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. Objective To determine whether ivermectin treatment can...
Or this one?
Error - Cookies Turned Off
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
This one did show a good effect.
RETRACTED: Effects of a Single Dose of Ivermectin on Viral and Clinical Outcomes in Asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 Infected Subjects: A Pilot Clinical Trial in Lebanon
Objective: This study was designed to determine the efficacy of ivermectin, an FDA-approved drug, in producing clinical benefits and decreasing the viral load of SARS-CoV-2 among asymptomatic subjects that tested positive for this virus in Lebanon. Methods: A randomized controlled trial was...
But was retracted due to faulty data.
This one did show an even BIGGER effect.
WITHDRAWN: Efficacy and Safety of Ivermectin for Treatment and prophylaxis of COVID-19 Pandemic
Research Square has withdrawn this preprint....
But was retracted due to falsified data.
The vaccine is working. There's NO doubt about it. No data exists that would show anywhere NEAR the same efficacy. Especially, and don't take this lightly, given you yourself state it has to be taken EARLY which just isn't going to happen in a large percentage of patients in the best case scenario even if they eliminated every barrier to getting it. People just don't go to the doctor.
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Colin Powell.
With Doctors like you I can understand why. Just now you cherry picked data and tried to minimize the studies that showed that the drugs worked. That is why places around the world used them to try and STOP people from getting to the hospital. Many have reported great results.
Is that an actual criticism? Because why wouldn’t it equally apply to you? The studies you cite are flawed in very significant ways. Lack of blinding. Bad enrollment methods. Poor randomization. The better studies with better techniques don’t show the same results. If this were SO effective, it would be extremely consistent in the data. If it were 90% effective, few of any trials would fail to show a treatment benefit. That’s not the case
LOL. Countries have used the drugs and it's effective according to them and studies. Why isn't used here? Because we have the best gov't money can buy and the FDA has Moderna Tattoed on it's ass.
No shit sherlock. That is the point.
And yet they fit the definition of a Leaky vaccine. Which means they are the real threat and SUPER SPREADERS.
BS. The only data I need to see is deaths per country and how they did it. We suck at it. WORST STATS ON EARTH.
It’s a nice article. Talking about blocking inflammatory pathways is exactly where we started. IL6 inhibitors have been used since the days of the first wave in New York. Efficacy isn’t great but it’s something. Biggest trial I’ve seen gives an odds ratio of survival of like 0.9. We don’t use them, we are using JAK inhibitors instead, which are generally about as effective with I think fewer adverse effects. I don’t think anyone mixes them. Probably too toxic.I knew you would do that. Many show no effect and many show effect. You CHERRY PICK DATA I GAVE YOU. I understood that you would do this
Cytokine Storm in COVID-19: The Current Evidence and Treatment Strategies - PMC
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov-2) is the pathogen that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). As of 25 May 2020, the outbreak of COVID-19 has caused 347,192 deaths around the world. The current evidence showed that ...
Here, we summarize the clinical and pathologic features of the cytokine storm in COVID-19. Our review shows that SARS-Cov-2 selectively induces a high level of IL-6 and results in the exhaustion of lymphocytes. The current evidence indicates that tocilizumab, an IL-6 inhibitor, is relatively effective and safe. Besides, corticosteroids, programmed cell death protein (PD)-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition, cytokine-adsorption devices, intravenous immunoglobulin, and antimalarial agents could be potentially useful and reliable approaches to counteract cytokine storm in COVID-19 patients.
Ever hear of an ecological fallacy?
