No Leftist Haters May Read This!

[DiveCon]

"The right simply wants things to stay as it is and let everyone live their lives the way they want."


as long as they are not gay
or atheists
or liberals
or feminists
or democrats
or progressives
or muslim

the right wants everone to live their lives the way they want as LONG as it is white european heterosexual christian conservative

..Exactly.

in one post from a deranged conservative I read
" conservatives want everyone tolivbe their lives their own way"

then
2 minutes later
in another post from a deranged conservative I read; "liberals attack us because we don't want to let gays marry"

fkn godamn deranged lunatic scumbag liars

its only a small minority that do that

 

[NYcarbineer]

He lost you after "erudition".

So did I.

PC, for all her adorably earnest efforts, has failed to grasp an irreversible reality of forum posting -

the merit, indeed often the necessity, of being concise.

I call it the three sentence rule. If you can't regularly make your point in three sentences or less, and fail in that regard repeatedly, you are almost inevitably doomed to be tuned out; after 3 sentences you begin, more and more,

to be talking to yourself.

You misunderstand...I don't write for those with attention deficit disorder.

Your inability to concentrate may explain the lacunae that have become so obvious.

I don't read your long posts, period. I can assure you I'm in a large contingent of USMB'ers in that regard.

You have little to say. The least you could do is honor that fact with an appropriate amount of attention to brevity.

 

[Bfgrn]

Yes. We do.

And we all see it differently.

However, the left seems to want changes so the right is forced to accept the left as a way of life....and thus initiatives to force the tax payer to pay for things even if it is not part of their personal lives

The right simply wants things to stay as it is and let everyone live their lives the way they want....and make choices who to do business with and who to be friends with; etc...

"The right simply wants things to stay as it is and let everyone live their lives the way they want."


as long as they are not gay
or atheists
or liberals
or feminists
or democrats
or progressives
or muslim

the right wants everone to live their lives the way they want as LONG as it is white european heterosexual christian conservative

you couldnt be more wrong

Republicans considering ideological purity test for candidates

Tue Nov 24, 3:57 pm ET

Ten members of the Republican National Committee are proposing a resolution demanding candidates embrace at least eight of 10 conservative principles if they hope to receive financial support and an official endorsement from the RNC. The "Proposed RNC Resolution on Reagan's Unity Principle for Support of Candidates," is designed to force candidates to prove that they support "conservative principles" while opposing "Obama's socialist agenda"

Republicans considering ideological purity test for candidates - Yahoo! News

 

[DiveCon]

and what one of these does what was claimed?

(1) We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes by opposing bills like Obama's "stimulus" bill;

(2) We support market-based health care reform and oppose Obama-style government run healthcare;

(3) We support market-based energy reforms by opposing cap and trade legislation;

(4) We support workers' right to secret ballot by opposing card check;

(5) We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants;

(6) We support victory in Iraq and Afghanistan by supporting military-recommended troop surges;

(7) We support containment of Iran and North Korea, particularly effective action to eliminate their nuclear weapons threat;

(8) We support retention of the Defense of Marriage Act;

(9) We support protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing and denial of health care and government funding of abortion; and

(10) We support the right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership;

easy answer, not one of them

 

[PoliticalChic]

PC, for all her adorably earnest efforts, has failed to grasp an irreversible reality of forum posting -

the merit, indeed often the necessity, of being concise.

I call it the three sentence rule. If you can't regularly make your point in three sentences or less, and fail in that regard repeatedly, you are almost inevitably doomed to be tuned out; after 3 sentences you begin, more and more,

to be talking to yourself.

You misunderstand...I don't write for those with attention deficit disorder.

Your inability to concentrate may explain the lacunae that have become so obvious.

I don't read your long posts, period. I can assure you I'm in a large contingent of USMB'ers in that regard.

You have little to say. The least you could do is honor that fact with an appropriate amount of attention to brevity.

You get no imput in my compositions.

But I did think about your prior post, and it seems to me that the public school system- I'll assume that you attended same...is in large measure, the cause of your lack of concentration.

Not to take that personally, rather, the schools have dumbed-down the curriculum and as a by-product, graduates of same tend not to want to read long complicated works.

Of course the other villain is television.

I understand that the length of this post puts it beyond you...

1. Today we are witness to the abandonment of the ideals of preservation of the great works and traditions of Western civilization, including the traditions of rationality and skepticism, by our universities.

a. This loss of respect for intellect spreads to lower schools, and to society in general. “It was only a matter of time. The graphic novel along with its on-screen equivalent, computer games, are to be offered to students as a new university course.” Holy academia, Batman! Scots universities offer courses in comics - Times Online

b. The state if education in earlier times? In “The Meaning of Everything,” Simon Winchester discusses the English of the time (June 6, 1928 the Oxford English Dictionary was completed) as follows:
“The English establishment of the day might be rightly derided at this remove as having been class-ridden and imperialist, bombastic and blimpish, racist and insouciant- but it was marked undeniably also by a sweeping erudition and confidence, and it was peopled by men and women who felt they were able to know all, to understand much, and in consequence to radiate the wisdom of deep learning.”
How times have changed.

2. In too many college courses, examinations are minimized, grades inflated, and grading is based on ‘class participation.’ This is especially true in schools of education, where prospective teachers are thus allowed to avoid competition, and invest in educational faddishness in opposition to conventional (bourgeois) methods and standards. Robert H. Bork, “Slouching Toward Gomorrah,” ch. 7.

3. The National Association of Scholars (NAS) documented the changes in universities comparing the years 1914, 1939, 1964 and 1993.

a. The study found “diminishing rigor at most prestigious colleges…” Students graduating from these elite schools not only had fewer assignments to complete but were asked to do considerably less in completing them.” The NAS commented on how this drop off in hard work negatively influences character, and this effect on society’s leaders impacts the strength and vitality of society.

 

[Bfgrn]

and what one of these does what was claimed?

(1) We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes by opposing bills like Obama's "stimulus" bill;

(2) We support market-based health care reform and oppose Obama-style government run healthcare;

(3) We support market-based energy reforms by opposing cap and trade legislation;

(4) We support workers' right to secret ballot by opposing card check;

(5) We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants;

(6) We support victory in Iraq and Afghanistan by supporting military-recommended troop surges;

(7) We support containment of Iran and North Korea, particularly effective action to eliminate their nuclear weapons threat;

(8) We support retention of the Defense of Marriage Act;

(9) We support protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing and denial of health care and government funding of abortion; and

(10) We support the right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership;

easy answer, not one of them

So, you support a collective doctrine over the rights of each individual...thanks for making that clear Dive...

 

[DiveCon]

and what one of these does what was claimed?

(1) We support smaller government, smaller national debt, lower deficits and lower taxes by opposing bills like Obama's "stimulus" bill;

(2) We support market-based health care reform and oppose Obama-style government run healthcare;

(3) We support market-based energy reforms by opposing cap and trade legislation;

(4) We support workers' right to secret ballot by opposing card check;

(5) We support legal immigration and assimilation into American society by opposing amnesty for illegal immigrants;

(6) We support victory in Iraq and Afghanistan by supporting military-recommended troop surges;

(7) We support containment of Iran and North Korea, particularly effective action to eliminate their nuclear weapons threat;

(8) We support retention of the Defense of Marriage Act;

(9) We support protecting the lives of vulnerable persons by opposing health care rationing and denial of health care and government funding of abortion; and

(10) We support the right to keep and bear arms by opposing government restrictions on gun ownership;

easy answer, not one of them

So, you support a collective doctrine over the rights of each individual...thanks for making that clear Dive...

i never said that, pea brain

 

[rikules]

..Exactly.

in one post from a deranged conservative I read
" conservatives want everyone tolivbe their lives their own way"

then
2 minutes later
in another post from a deranged conservative I read; "liberals attack us because we don't want to let gays marry"

fkn godamn deranged lunatic scumbag liars

its only a small minority that do that

small minority?

it's rush limbaugh and 20 million dittoheads

it's ann coulter, michael savage, michelle malkin, fox news, glenn beck and THEIR millkions fo deranged followers


it's pat robetson, the ACLJ, every christian radio station in the country andTHEIR millions of followers

it's political chick and alliebbale and MOST of the other deranged cons on this board and every other board I have frequented inthe last 20 years

YOU are the minority

 

[rikules]

..Exactly.

in one post from a deranged conservative I read
" conservatives want everyone tolivbe their lives their own way"

then
2 minutes later
in another post from a deranged conservative I read; "liberals attack us because we don't want to let gays marry"

fkn godamn deranged lunatic scumbag liars

its only a small minority that do that

if all liberals support the right ofgays to marry

and only a few conservatives actually work to deny gays that right.....

how come....

all over the country....

even here in maine....

whenever the issue of gays having the right to marry comes up for a vote....

it is DEFEATED!


please tell me WHO (if NOT most cosnervatives) is voting to DENY them that right?

hmmmm?


who?


gremlins?

seems to me that if MOST cons and AL Lliberals believe in the rights of gays to live as they choose then gays would HAVE the right to marry....

but they do NOT!

so
SOMEONE (LOTS of SOMEONES) are voting to DENY THEM THE RIGHT TO LIVE AS THEY CHOOSE.....

I have a feeling it's that "minority" of conservatives you dismiss

 

[DiveCon]

in one post from a deranged conservative I read
" conservatives want everyone tolivbe their lives their own way"

then
2 minutes later
in another post from a deranged conservative I read; "liberals attack us because we don't want to let gays marry"

fkn godamn deranged lunatic scumbag liars

its only a small minority that do that

if all liberals support the right ofgays to marry

and only a few conservatives actually work to deny gays that right.....

how come....

all over the country....

even here in maine....

whenever the issue of gays having the right to marry comes up for a vote....

it is DEFEATED!


please tell me WHO (if NOT most cosnervatives) is voting to DENY them that right?

hmmmm?


who?


gremlins?

seems to me that if MOST cons and AL Lliberals believe in the rights of gays to live as they choose then gays would HAVE the right to marry....

but they do NOT!

so
SOMEONE (LOTS of SOMEONES) are voting to DENY THEM THE RIGHT TO LIVE AS THEY CHOOSE.....

I have a feeling it's that "minority" of conservatives you dismiss

hey dipshit, clearly there are a lot of people that are liberal and dont agree with gay marriage


for your info, I want the goverment to get totally out of the marriage business and have for some time
now, get a towel to wipe the spittle off your face

 

[haileydavey]

There is no difference. The left criticises the right and vice versa.

Criticizing an ideology based on the credibility of ideas is BY NO MEANS the same as criticizing an ideology based on the character of the people WITH that ideology.

To call a conservative a racist becuase we do not believe in tax payer dollars going to healthcare is not the same as saying that conserrvative thinking is wrong as we all need to help one another.

ahh yes

the hate and switch routine....


cons regularly say things like;

"blacks are lazy and shiftless
blakcs are violent and thieves
blacks are less intelligent
blacks refuse to work and want everything just given to them"

then
when someone says...golly...that sounds awfully racist to me...

you immediately SWITCH to;

"racist?
just because I said I don't want tax payer dollars going to healthcare ?"

THAT makes me racist?"

you cons are insane
and liars

I been reading this thread and was going to try and make it to the end but I got to this statement and the pure ignorance of the comment compelled me to write. I have not read in any post someone stating anything you posted. Why call racist when no one has shown anything even close to what you posted? I know I have not been here long but I have yet to see those comments made. It is posts like this that makes racism or racist such overused words. It is becoming meaningless.

 

[Bfgrn]

Criticizing an ideology based on the credibility of ideas is BY NO MEANS the same as criticizing an ideology based on the character of the people WITH that ideology.

To call a conservative a racist becuase we do not believe in tax payer dollars going to healthcare is not the same as saying that conserrvative thinking is wrong as we all need to help one another.

ahh yes

the hate and switch routine....


cons regularly say things like;

"blacks are lazy and shiftless
blakcs are violent and thieves
blacks are less intelligent
blacks refuse to work and want everything just given to them"

then
when someone says...golly...that sounds awfully racist to me...

you immediately SWITCH to;

"racist?
just because I said I don't want tax payer dollars going to healthcare ?"

THAT makes me racist?"

you cons are insane
and liars

I been reading this thread and was going to try and make it to the end but I got to this statement and the pure ignorance of the comment compelled me to write. I have not read in any post someone stating anything you posted. Why call racist when no one has shown anything even close to what you posted? I know I have not been here long but I have yet to see those comments made. It is posts like this that makes racism or racist such overused words. It is becoming meaningless.

You're right haileydavey...you have not been here long.

rikules' narrative of the right is very accurate. It may not appear in this thread, but it is rampant on this board.

 

[gautama]

If it gives you comfort to demonize the other side of the aisle, so be it.

Political CHic is a poster on a website that has no more than 100 people at a time reading it.

Our Presdsident is followed by every news agancy and every word he speaks is broadcast nationally.

And you certainly can not deny that he is continually demonizing the other side of the aisle.

Can you recall any other President that has done this so frequently in the past 40 years?

Yes.

The entire last decade.

Coyote-Peyote, You are a blatantly lying Piece of Shit.

 

[Meister]

ahh yes

the hate and switch routine....


cons regularly say things like;

"blacks are lazy and shiftless
blakcs are violent and thieves
blacks are less intelligent
blacks refuse to work and want everything just given to them"

then
when someone says...golly...that sounds awfully racist to me...

you immediately SWITCH to;

"racist?
just because I said I don't want tax payer dollars going to healthcare ?"

THAT makes me racist?"

you cons are insane
and liars

I been reading this thread and was going to try and make it to the end but I got to this statement and the pure ignorance of the comment compelled me to write. I have not read in any post someone stating anything you posted. Why call racist when no one has shown anything even close to what you posted? I know I have not been here long but I have yet to see those comments made. It is posts like this that makes racism or racist such overused words. It is becoming meaningless.

You're right haileydavey...you have not been here long.

rikules' narrative of the right is very accurate. It may not appear in this thread, but it is rampant on this board.

Only to a left wing wacko pea brain.

 

[editec]

The Left Hates Conservatives
Tuesday, July 27, 2010

1. "Perhaps the most telling of the recent revelations of the liberal/left Journolist, a list consisting of about 400 major liberal/left journalists, is the depth of their hatred of conservatives…as exemplified by the e-mail from an NPR reporter expressing her wish to personally see Rush Limbaugh die a painful death -- and the apparent absence of any objection from the other liberal journalists.

2. Every one of us on the right has seen this hatred…[by]…mainstream elite liberal journalists. There is simply nothing analogous among elite conservative journalists. Yes, nearly all conservatives believe that the left is leading America to ruin. But while there is plenty of conservative anger over this fact, there is little or nothing on the right to match the left's hatred of conservative individuals.

3. From Karl Marx to today, the Left has always hated people on the Right, not merely differed or been angry with them. Why?

a. First, the left thinks the right is evil. Examples are innumerable. For example, Howard Dean, the former head of the Democratic Party said, "In contradistinction to the Republicans ... (Democrats) don't believe kids ought to go to bed hungry at night." Or take Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., who, among many similar comments, said, "I want to say a few words about what it means to be a Democrat. It's very simple: We have a conscience."

b. Second, when you don't confront real evil, you hate those who do. Whether out of guilt over their own cowardice or fear that the one who confronted the bully would provoke the bully to lash out more, those who refuse to confront the bully often resent the one who does. During the 1980s, the left expressed far more hatred of Ronald Reagan than of Soviet Communist dictator Leonid Brezhnev. And, when Reagan labeled the Soviet Union an "evil empire," the liberal world was enraged ... at Reagan. Today, the left has similar contempt for those who take a hard line on Islamic terror. The liberal and leftist media routinely place quote marks around the words War on Terror…the Obama administration has actually forbidden use of the term "Islamic terror." The real enemies the Democratic administration is prepared to name are the Republican Party, tea parties, Fox News and talk radio.

c. Third, the left's utopian vision is prevented only by the right. From its inception, leftism has been a secular utopian religion….imagining a utopian future. There will be no poor, no war, no conflict, no inequality. That future is only a few more government programs away from reality. And who stands in the way of such perfection? Conservatives.

4. How could a utopian not hate a conservative? The right, with its beliefs in a strong military; in individuals, not the state; taking care of themselves, their families and their neighbors; and in punishing criminals, is the anti-Love, a figure as reviled on the left as the antichrist is to Christians. The right, with its beliefs in a strong military; in individuals, not the state; taking care of themselves, their families and their neighbors; and in punishing criminals, is the anti-Love, a figure as reviled on the left as the antichrist is to Christians.

a. This hatred will only increase if the left feels its programs to greatly increase the size of the government are in any way threatened in the forthcoming elections."
The Dennis Prager Show

Partisan blather.

 

[Jarhead]

The right simply wants things to stay as it is and let everyone live their lives the way they want....

staying 'as is' is no more beneficial than changing things for the sole purpose of changing them.

and no, the right does NOT want everyone to 'live their lives the way they want'. were that the case, they'd stop interfering in reproductive choice, gay marriage and other wedge issues'.

a president who wants people 'to live the way they want' does not make his first act as president an executive order cutting off funding for organizations that include abortion in their counseling.

people who want others to live as they wish do not include as part of their political platform a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage.

people who want others to live as they wish do not force people not to so much as put up a picture of their same-sex lover.

the right only wants people to live the way THE RIGHT wants them to live. I wish it were otherwise.

Jillian, I am surprised at you. You cherry picked a line of mine. I made it quite clear that the right, on the most part does not care if you want to abort. We simply do not want to pay for it as it is against our belief. "Do as you want, but dont ask us to pay for it." It is unfair to ask us to pay for something we consider murder....just as anti war people have the right to say "I dont want my tax dollars to pay for war, as I see war as murder."

Most on the right are not against gay marriage. They are simply saying "dont change our definition of marriage to accommodate a lifestyle that we do not agree with".

You are either naive (which I doubt) or ignoiring the truth about how the right thinks.

So I say again...

The right wants all to live as they want....but dont make US pay for it and dont make US change what we do to accomodate it...and we will not make you do either for our lifestyle.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Left Hates Conservatives
Tuesday, July 27, 2010

1. "Perhaps the most telling of the recent revelations of the liberal/left Journolist, a list consisting of about 400 major liberal/left journalists, is the depth of their hatred of conservatives…as exemplified by the e-mail from an NPR reporter expressing her wish to personally see Rush Limbaugh die a painful death -- and the apparent absence of any objection from the other liberal journalists.

2. Every one of us on the right has seen this hatred…[by]…mainstream elite liberal journalists. There is simply nothing analogous among elite conservative journalists. Yes, nearly all conservatives believe that the left is leading America to ruin. But while there is plenty of conservative anger over this fact, there is little or nothing on the right to match the left's hatred of conservative individuals.

3. From Karl Marx to today, the Left has always hated people on the Right, not merely differed or been angry with them. Why?

a. First, the left thinks the right is evil. Examples are innumerable. For example, Howard Dean, the former head of the Democratic Party said, "In contradistinction to the Republicans ... (Democrats) don't believe kids ought to go to bed hungry at night." Or take Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., who, among many similar comments, said, "I want to say a few words about what it means to be a Democrat. It's very simple: We have a conscience."

b. Second, when you don't confront real evil, you hate those who do. Whether out of guilt over their own cowardice or fear that the one who confronted the bully would provoke the bully to lash out more, those who refuse to confront the bully often resent the one who does. During the 1980s, the left expressed far more hatred of Ronald Reagan than of Soviet Communist dictator Leonid Brezhnev. And, when Reagan labeled the Soviet Union an "evil empire," the liberal world was enraged ... at Reagan. Today, the left has similar contempt for those who take a hard line on Islamic terror. The liberal and leftist media routinely place quote marks around the words War on Terror…the Obama administration has actually forbidden use of the term "Islamic terror." The real enemies the Democratic administration is prepared to name are the Republican Party, tea parties, Fox News and talk radio.

c. Third, the left's utopian vision is prevented only by the right. From its inception, leftism has been a secular utopian religion….imagining a utopian future. There will be no poor, no war, no conflict, no inequality. That future is only a few more government programs away from reality. And who stands in the way of such perfection? Conservatives.

4. How could a utopian not hate a conservative? The right, with its beliefs in a strong military; in individuals, not the state; taking care of themselves, their families and their neighbors; and in punishing criminals, is the anti-Love, a figure as reviled on the left as the antichrist is to Christians. The right, with its beliefs in a strong military; in individuals, not the state; taking care of themselves, their families and their neighbors; and in punishing criminals, is the anti-Love, a figure as reviled on the left as the antichrist is to Christians.

a. This hatred will only increase if the left feels its programs to greatly increase the size of the government are in any way threatened in the forthcoming elections."
The Dennis Prager Show

1. "Perhaps the most telling of the recent revelations of the liberal/left Journolist, a list consisting of about 400 major liberal/left journalists, is the depth of their hatred of conservatives…as exemplified by the e-mail from an NPR reporter expressing her wish to personally see Rush Limbaugh die a painful death -- and the apparent absence of any objection from the other liberal journalists.


ann coulter said her greatest regret about 9/11 was that the terrorists didn't kill everyone at the new york times....

rush limbaugh has suggested;
leaving only some liberals left alive
beating them with clubs

and called then "the enemies of America....we are at war with liberals..in war it's ok to HATE your enemies..in war it's ok to KILL your enemies...."

a few years ago there was a dirty bomb scare in the north easr (boston)
and conservatives EVERYWHERE were dancing in the street, foaming at the mouth, HOPING it wold happen and gleefully counting the vast number of DEAD liberals....

where was the denunciation by conservative journalists?
where was the denunciatin by conservatives on message boards?
where was YOUR denunciation?

you accuse your enemies of your own crimes

you are filled with hated for liberals
you express this hatred on a daily basis
then you whine and wonder why liberals hate YOU!

liberals hate YOU because YOU are filled with hate for everyone who isn't hard core right wing HATEFILLED conservative!

TAKE SOME REPSONIBILTY for your OWN ACTIONS!

on conservative wed sites you can buy bumper stickers and t-shirts that read;
club liberals
make America a better place, kill a liberal
nuke n.y.
I acelerate for liberals



1. "Perhaps the most telling of the recent revelations of the liberal/left Journolist, a list consisting of about 400 major liberal/left journalists, is the depth of their hatred of conservatives…as exemplified by the e-mail from an NPR reporter expressing her wish to personally see Rush Limbaugh die a painful death -- and the apparent absence of any objection from the other liberal journalists.


Public Radio Publicist Apologizes For Controversial Remarks About Limbaugh : NPR


"In fact, Spitz has never been an NPR employee."

At 2:10 p.m. ET, Spitz issued this statement
I made poorly considered remarks about Rush Limbaugh to what I believed was a private email discussion group from my personal email account. As a publicist, I realize more than anyone that is no excuse for irresponsible behavior. I apologize to anyone I may have offended and I regret these comments greatly; they do not reflect the values by which I conduct my life.


And in an email to NPR, Jennifer Ferro, KCRW's general manager, said "the private comments made by one of our employees, Sarah Spitz, are regrettable for all of us at KCRW.

Sarah is a longtime employee of KCRW. Please note that she is not affiliated or employed by NPR, nor does she work as a journalist, as has been incorrectly reported in the media

you are a deciever
a liar
you use MISINFORNMATION and LIES to validate and spread YOUr hatred
you are yrou hatefilled conservative journalists are WORSE than this woman

this 1 single woman...

as opposed to the BIG FKN LIST fo conservative journalists who spread hatred on a daily basis

-------------------------------------------------

2. 2. Every one of us on the right has seen this hatred…[by]…mainstream elite liberal journalists. There is simply nothing analogous among elite conservative journalists. Yes, nearly all conservatives believe that the left is leading America to ruin. But while there is plenty of conservative anger over this fact, there is little or nothing on the right to match the left's hatred of conservative individuals.

ridiculous
there is EASILY as much hatred coming from conservative journalists and people like you.
probably more.

hatred from coulter
hatred from limbaugh
hated and mockery from fox news, glenn beck, bill oreily, michelle malkin

there is obviously something wrong with your brain.

I harbor no hope that it can be cured

your irrational hatred of all things liberal
your accusations of crimes that they never actually committed
the fact that you refuse to accept any responsibilty for the back and forth hatred

YOU are JUST as responsible for HATRED as any liberal is

yet you blame THEM for it ALL while denying any responsibilty on the part of yourself or your fellow HATEFILLED conservatives


you are the worst American

you make me sick

Rik-O, this is truly one of the most disorganized and scatter-shot posts in the entire thread!

The passion is great, and the potential as a response to the OP and post #22 is there... well hidden, but there.

Now, if you purposely misplaced and left out quotation marks and left off links, so that one could not dispute the post, that would be disingenuous...

But I rather think that your uncontrolled anger at the right resulted in a post that looked more like an unmade bed, or an envelope with no address...

If you have the time, I'd love to see it in a correctly organized manner, and would entertain responding to same.

As for your "you make me sick," there are pills you could take, ask your doctor if they are right for you.

 

[PoliticalChic]

If it gives you comfort to demonize the other side of the aisle, so be it.

Sky-D, can you be serious?

After the Journolist scandal, and numerous examples of the left using ad hominems and demonization...

I no longer wish to convert the left, merely to expose same.

Somehow, by your lights, indicating the iniquity is the same as effectuating it.

Mr Prager is wrong. My politics lean toward the left and I cannot relate to what Mr Prager says about the left. It doesn't fit for my experience.

I don't think the right is evil. Nor do I consider my politics a religion. I have a religion, and it certainly affects my politics.

Mr Prager just lays out some broad sweeping generalizations. The other consideration is the people he quotes do not represent what the collecitve left thinks or feels.

I think there is far too much of this stereotyping and demonizing of the other side of the aisle.

You have a quick mind and you study the issues Political Chic. I always feel I learn something from you posts.

I don't think Mr Prager helps the cause.

1. American liberalism is a totalitarian political religion, in that liberalism today sees no realm of human life that is beyond political significance, from what you eat to what you smoke to what you say….Liberals place their faith in priestly experts who know better, who plan, exhort, badger, and scold. They try to use science to discredit traditional notions of religion and faith, but speak the language of pluralism and spirituality to defend ‘nontraditional’ beliefs.” Jonah Goldberg, “Liberal Fascism,” p. 14.

2. Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, argues Coulter, it bears all the attributes of a religion itself. In Godless, she throws open the doors of the Church of Liberalism, showing us:
its sacraments (abortion)
its holy writ (Roe v. Wade)
its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal)
its clergy (public school teachers)
its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free)
its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the "absolute moral authority" of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland)
and its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident)
(Ann Coulter, Godless: The Church of Liberalism)

 

[edthecynic]

Sky-D, can you be serious?

After the Journolist scandal, and numerous examples of the left using ad hominems and demonization...

I no longer wish to convert the left, merely to expose same.

Somehow, by your lights, indicating the iniquity is the same as effectuating it.

Mr Prager is wrong. My politics lean toward the left and I cannot relate to what Mr Prager says about the left. It doesn't fit for my experience.

I don't think the right is evil. Nor do I consider my politics a religion. I have a religion, and it certainly affects my politics.

Mr Prager just lays out some broad sweeping generalizations. The other consideration is the people he quotes do not represent what the collecitve left thinks or feels.

I think there is far too much of this stereotyping and demonizing of the other side of the aisle.

You have a quick mind and you study the issues Political Chic. I always feel I learn something from you posts.

I don't think Mr Prager helps the cause.

1. American liberalism is a totalitarian political religion, in that liberalism today sees no realm of human life that is beyond political significance, from what you eat to what you smoke to what you say….Liberals place their faith in priestly experts who know better, who plan, exhort, badger, and scold. They try to use science to discredit traditional notions of religion and faith, but speak the language of pluralism and spirituality to defend ‘nontraditional’ beliefs.” Jonah Goldberg, “Liberal Fascism,” p. 14.

2. Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, argues Coulter, it bears all the attributes of a religion itself. In Godless, she throws open the doors of the Church of Liberalism, showing us:
its sacraments (abortion)
its holy writ (Roe v. Wade)
its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal)
its clergy (public school teachers)
its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free)
its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the "absolute moral authority" of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland)
and its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident)
(Ann Coulter, Godless: The Church of Liberalism)

Neither Goldberg nor Coulter have any credibility. All they do is parrot GOP propaganda as their own thoughts. They prove this by parroting the same erroneous crap from the same erroneous GOP script.

For example;

CLOSE ENCOUNTERS: IS AL GORE AN ALIEN?
by Jonah Goldberg

"While touring Monticello, Gore asked a guide, “Who are these people?” while pointing at statues of Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and Ben Franklin."

In a highly publicized stop at Monticello during Clinton's 1993 inaugural festivities, Gore pointed to carvings of Washington and Benjamin Franklin and asked the curator: 'Who are these guys?' He was surrounded by reporters and TV cameras when he said it.
Source: Slander

 

[Jarhead]

Mr Prager is wrong. My politics lean toward the left and I cannot relate to what Mr Prager says about the left. It doesn't fit for my experience.

I don't think the right is evil. Nor do I consider my politics a religion. I have a religion, and it certainly affects my politics.

Mr Prager just lays out some broad sweeping generalizations. The other consideration is the people he quotes do not represent what the collecitve left thinks or feels.

I think there is far too much of this stereotyping and demonizing of the other side of the aisle.

You have a quick mind and you study the issues Political Chic. I always feel I learn something from you posts.

I don't think Mr Prager helps the cause.

1. American liberalism is a totalitarian political religion, in that liberalism today sees no realm of human life that is beyond political significance, from what you eat to what you smoke to what you say….Liberals place their faith in priestly experts who know better, who plan, exhort, badger, and scold. They try to use science to discredit traditional notions of religion and faith, but speak the language of pluralism and spirituality to defend ‘nontraditional’ beliefs.” Jonah Goldberg, “Liberal Fascism,” p. 14.

2. Though liberalism rejects the idea of God and reviles people of faith, argues Coulter, it bears all the attributes of a religion itself. In Godless, she throws open the doors of the Church of Liberalism, showing us:
its sacraments (abortion)
its holy writ (Roe v. Wade)
its martyrs (from Soviet spy Alger Hiss to cop-killer Mumia Abu Jamal)
its clergy (public school teachers)
its churches (government schools, where prayer is prohibited but condoms are free)
its doctrine of infallibility (as manifest in the "absolute moral authority" of spokesmen from Cindy Sheehan to Max Cleland)
and its cosmology (in which mankind is an inconsequential accident)
(Ann Coulter, Godless: The Church of Liberalism)

Neither Goldberg nor Coulter have any credibility. All they do is parrot GOP propaganda as their own thoughts. They prove this by parroting the same erroneous crap from the same erroneous GOP script.

For example;

CLOSE ENCOUNTERS: IS AL GORE AN ALIEN?
by Jonah Goldberg

"While touring Monticello, Gore asked a guide, “Who are these people?” while pointing at statues of Thomas Jefferson, John Adams and Ben Franklin."

In a highly publicized stop at Monticello during Clinton's 1993 inaugural festivities, Gore pointed to carvings of Washington and Benjamin Franklin and asked the curator: 'Who are these guys?' He was surrounded by reporters and TV cameras when he said it.
Source: Slander

And the White House Press Secretary under Obama made fun of Palin for doing what MANY people do....write notes on her hand.

But that is not slander in your eyes. That is warranted criticism.

Leave that to the late night comedians. It is slander when the White House does it.