No Justice For Ashli??

[bodecea]

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

Ashli was attempting to breach a secure perimeter protecting our Congressmen. Once that perimeter was breached, there would be no way to protect members of Congress who were being threatened by an angry mob.

Ashli‘s relatives should sue the hell out of Donald J Trump
He is the one who filled her with lies, he is the one who filled her with rage, he is the one who called her to Washington and sent her to the Capitol.

Odd...I could have sworn the members of Congress were protected, after the perimeter was breached. Moreover, wasn't she shot in the lobby?

She is White. So the Media does not care.

Yeah....we know your stance on race. We see you.

 

[Lastamender]

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

So rioting is now a legitimate form of protest?

It was in the summer and it is again in MN.

No it wasn't. Only idiots think rioting is.

Are you serious?

 

[bodecea]

Prosecutors: No charges for officer in Capitol riot shooting

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S.

apnews.com

"Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Authorities had considered for months whether criminal charges were appropriate for the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt -- The Justice Department’s decision, though expected, officially closes out the investigation.

Prosecutors said they had reviewed video of the shooting, along with statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses, examined physical evidence from the scene and reviewed the autopsy results. “Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution,” the department said in a statement."

This sets a very dangerous precedent....It basically gives officers a blank check to gun down people, unarmed people, good people.....and the officer face no consequences for his or her actions...Because of this decision, cops can essentially gun you down just because you didn't obey an order they gave -- they can gun you down then claim they feared for their safety while dehumanizing you as some violent person or a member of some angry mob... even tho that person is unarmed and was posing no threat.

Now to be fair, it's perfectly OK for certain types of unarmed people to be gunned down for not obeying cops or maybe using inappropriate language towards cops that could cause them to fear for their safety; but it's different when you are actually fighting against a tyrannical government who stole an election and your only recourse is to storm the Capitol to voice your grievances, cosplay in Neo-Nazi and Neo-Confederate apparel, joke about executing the VP and perhaps scare congress members into overturning the election for you and stuff...

She took part in an armed insurrection against the US.
She got justice.

No one in the Capitol had a gun but cops and Congressmen. Stop ******* lying.

That's what they do. Lie. Not one of the trespasser was armed.

The only guns were those carried by Capital police and whichever of the Congressmen were armed.

The unarmed protester was the only one shot.

"That's what they do. Lie. Not one of the trespasser was armed."

The liar is you.

Among the weapons they were armed with, and some used, were:

stun stick
taser
pepper spray
baseball bat
hockey stick
crutches
flagpole
spear
fire extinguisher

It's the terrorist mentality.
You know, 9-11 boxcutters and all that.
They knew they police would be looking for guns so they armed themselves with boxcutters.
Terrorists.

The Authorities are studying TheDonald.win forum where a lot of them talked about ways to kill members of Congress.

Good. Start with Maxine Waters.

I see you like to display the inherent violent tendencies of your ****** rightie ilk.

 

[bodecea]

The right decision! She was an insurrectionist, under orders from Trump, hell bent on overthrowing the government of the United States of America. She received exactly what she deserved by a patriotic officer defending our country.

I agree. All people who do not obey orders of the Reich should be shot in the back like this women. Way to go.

You do realize that the so-called "Reich" which was in power when Babbit was shot was under the control of Republicans, right? There was a Republican president in power with a Republican Senate majority.

And you morons wonder why people laugh at you.

Well the President has no authority over what happens in Congress. The Dems controlled half that chamber and Nancy P order the Sgt of Arms of the House to rejected the Admin's offer for national guard before Jan 6, and then ordered the Cap Police to stand down on the 6th...then had her storm troopers kill this unarmed woman taking pics in a lobby.

That is not true. The fact is that for the National Guard to be called up, the executive branch has to approve. Pence ended up doing it because Trump dithered. She was not taking pictures. The video clearly shows she was part of a terrorist mob trying to break into the chambers. Quit lying.

Trump Offered to Deploy 10,000 National Guard Troops in DC Ahead of Jan. 6 - Mark Meadows | 09 Feb 2021 | Former President Donald Trump offered to deploy 10,000 National Guard troops in Washington D.C. prior to Jan. 6, the day of the Capitol building breach, according to former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows. Meadows told Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures"that although Trump had been vocal about offering Capitol Police and National Guard presence at the Capitol on multiple occasions last month, his offer was rebuked "every time." "We also know that in January, but also throughout the summer, that the president was very vocal in making sure that we had plenty of National Guard, plenty of additional support because he supports our rule of law and supports our law enforcement and offered additional help," Meadows told host Maria Bartiromo. "Even in January, that was a given, as many as 10,000 National Guard troops were told to be on the ready by the Secretary of Defense" Meadows said. "That was a direct order from President Trump and yet here is what we see...all kinds of blame going around but yet not a whole lot of accountability."

Liar. They turned him down.

How interesting that that claim comes in February.....where was it in January?

 

[Lastamender]

The right decision! She was an insurrectionist, under orders from Trump, hell bent on overthrowing the government of the United States of America. She received exactly what she deserved by a patriotic officer defending our country.

I agree. All people who do not obey orders of the Reich should be shot in the back like this women. Way to go.

You do realize that the so-called "Reich" which was in power when Babbit was shot was under the control of Republicans, right? There was a Republican president in power with a Republican Senate majority.

And you morons wonder why people laugh at you.

Well the President has no authority over what happens in Congress. The Dems controlled half that chamber and Nancy P order the Sgt of Arms of the House to rejected the Admin's offer for national guard before Jan 6, and then ordered the Cap Police to stand down on the 6th...then had her storm troopers kill this unarmed woman taking pics in a lobby.

That is not true. The fact is that for the National Guard to be called up, the executive branch has to approve. Pence ended up doing it because Trump dithered. She was not taking pictures. The video clearly shows she was part of a terrorist mob trying to break into the chambers. Quit lying.

Trump Offered to Deploy 10,000 National Guard Troops in DC Ahead of Jan. 6 - Mark Meadows | 09 Feb 2021 | Former President Donald Trump offered to deploy 10,000 National Guard troops in Washington D.C. prior to Jan. 6, the day of the Capitol building breach, according to former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows. Meadows told Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures"that although Trump had been vocal about offering Capitol Police and National Guard presence at the Capitol on multiple occasions last month, his offer was rebuked "every time." "We also know that in January, but also throughout the summer, that the president was very vocal in making sure that we had plenty of National Guard, plenty of additional support because he supports our rule of law and supports our law enforcement and offered additional help," Meadows told host Maria Bartiromo. "Even in January, that was a given, as many as 10,000 National Guard troops were told to be on the ready by the Secretary of Defense" Meadows said. "That was a direct order from President Trump and yet here is what we see...all kinds of blame going around but yet not a whole lot of accountability."

Liar. They turned him down.

How interesting that that claim comes in February.....where was it in January?

Trump Offered to Deploy 10,000 National Guard Troops in DC Ahead of Jan. 6 - Mark Meadows
Right there.

 

[Coyote]

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

So rioting is now a legitimate form of protest?

It was in the summer and it is again in MN.

Protesting yes. Rioting and looting no.

That's rhe line.

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

So rioting is now a legitimate form of protest?

It was in the summer and it is again in MN.

No it wasn't. Only idiots think rioting is.

Are you serious?

Yes.

Rioting is not a valid form of protest.

Those who protested without engaging in violence, looting, arson and assault are protesters exercising their rights.

Those who engage in violence and assault and looting are committing a crime.

Why is that a hard concept for you?

 

[WelfareQueen]

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

So rioting is now a legitimate form of protest?

It was in the summer and it is again in MN.

Protesting yes. Rioting and looting no.

That's rhe line.

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

So rioting is now a legitimate form of protest?

It was in the summer and it is again in MN.

No it wasn't. Only idiots think rioting is.

Are you serious?

Yes.

Rioting is not a valid form of protest.

Those who protested without engaging in violence, looting, arson and assault are protesters exercising their rights.

Those who engage in violence and assault and looting are committing a crime.

Why is that a hard concept for you?

Thank you for saying this.

 

[busybee01]

Prosecutors: No charges for officer in Capitol riot shooting

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S.

apnews.com

"Federal prosecutors will not charge a police officer who shot and killed a woman as she climbed through the broken part of a door during the insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. Authorities had considered for months whether criminal charges were appropriate for the Capitol Police officer who fatally shot Ashli Babbitt -- The Justice Department’s decision, though expected, officially closes out the investigation.

Prosecutors said they had reviewed video of the shooting, along with statements from the officer involved and other officers and witnesses, examined physical evidence from the scene and reviewed the autopsy results. “Based on that investigation, officials determined that there is insufficient evidence to support a criminal prosecution,” the department said in a statement."

This sets a very dangerous precedent....It basically gives officers a blank check to gun down people, unarmed people, good people.....and the officer face no consequences for his or her actions...Because of this decision, cops can essentially gun you down just because you didn't obey an order they gave -- they can gun you down then claim they feared for their safety while dehumanizing you as some violent person or a member of some angry mob... even tho that person is unarmed and was posing no threat.

Now to be fair, it's perfectly OK for certain types of unarmed people to be gunned down for not obeying cops or maybe using inappropriate language towards cops that could cause them to fear for their safety; but it's different when you are actually fighting against a tyrannical government who stole an election and your only recourse is to storm the Capitol to voice your grievances, cosplay in Neo-Nazi and Neo-Confederate apparel, joke about executing the VP and perhaps scare congress members into overturning the election for you and stuff...

These people were storming the capitol. They killed 1 officer and injured 140 others. There should have been more than 1 protestor killed. She got her justice and her just deserts.

wow....only a Fascist would want more people to be killed...just sick stuff really.

I have no sympathy for terrorists. More forceful action might have kept 140 officers from being injured and 1 killed.

Oh please....you did nothing but defend and deflect from the terrorist and insurrectionist that began their Dem funded assaults in Nov of 2016

More forceful action might of been needed on Jan 6...but Nancy P order the Cap Police to stand down.....then this happened....a young woman, standing in the lobby of the Capitol, on her phone....gets killed.

No she did not. Pemce ended up calling the National Guard because Trump dithered.

Nope she did...she also denied the aid for National Guard and numerous offers for help from the Admin prior to Jan 6th.

The VP doesn't have the authority to order in the National Guard...come on MAN...at least make your propaganda believable!

You are the one who is distributing propaganda. The head of the National Guard testified that they were ready to go but it took the TRUMP Pentagon 3 hours to approve it. The DC National Guard works differently from state National Guards. You see how quickly Trump got the military to respond for a cheap photo-op. It shows they can be monilized quickly if Trump desires it.

 

[Lastamender]

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

So rioting is now a legitimate form of protest?

It was in the summer and it is again in MN.

Protesting yes. Rioting and looting no.

That's rhe line.

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

So rioting is now a legitimate form of protest?

It was in the summer and it is again in MN.

No it wasn't. Only idiots think rioting is.

Are you serious?

Yes.

Rioting is not a valid form of protest.

Those who protested without engaging in violence, looting, arson and assault are protesters exercising their rights.

Those who engage in violence and assault and looting are committing a crime.

Why is that a hard concept for you?

Not as hard as objectivity is for you.

 

[Coyote]

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

So rioting is now a legitimate form of protest?

It was in the summer and it is again in MN.

Protesting yes. Rioting and looting no.

That's rhe line.

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

So rioting is now a legitimate form of protest?

It was in the summer and it is again in MN.

No it wasn't. Only idiots think rioting is.

Are you serious?

Yes.

Rioting is not a valid form of protest.

Those who protested without engaging in violence, looting, arson and assault are protesters exercising their rights.

Those who engage in violence and assault and looting are committing a crime.

Why is that a hard concept for you?

Not as hard as objectivity is for you.

You realize, right, that coming from you that is a meaningless statement?

 

[busybee01]

One thing I did notice...and I know there are many people upset by this decision...personally, I understand it...but I know folks are upset...yet not one person or group has looted, burnt, or assaulted anyone because of it...meanwhile...in Portland, and Minn.....

Did you just wake up from a deep deep sleep? Congress was looted and some members of Congress lost their possession. As for no one being assaulted, that was mainly because Congress folks were protected and moved by the security. Heck, talks were for the reps to be kidnapped and the VP to be hanged. That it did not happen was just pure luck.

Look at you shilling for the cops' "right" to gun down unarmed protestors. I knew you were a fascist.

You are shilling for a mob that launcehed a terrorist attack on our capitol. I shows you are a terrorist.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

Floyd was arrested or in the process for passing a counterfeit bill. He resisted arrest and he died from a drug overdose. Babbit got no warning, she was never restrained, she was unarmed and shot for no reason.

If Republicans didn't LIE, they'd have NOTHING to say!

Projecting again, Democrat slave?

To recap.....

A bunch of fragile minded reactionary right wing ammosexual cucks stormed the capitol because of a lie.....

And some of them didn't even bother to cast their vote for Trump in order to help ensure his reelection.

 

[Lastamender]

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

So rioting is now a legitimate form of protest?

It was in the summer and it is again in MN.

Protesting yes. Rioting and looting no.

That's rhe line.

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

So rioting is now a legitimate form of protest?

It was in the summer and it is again in MN.

No it wasn't. Only idiots think rioting is.

Are you serious?

Yes.

Rioting is not a valid form of protest.

Those who protested without engaging in violence, looting, arson and assault are protesters exercising their rights.

Those who engage in violence and assault and looting are committing a crime.

Why is that a hard concept for you?

Not as hard as objectivity is for you.

You realize, right, that coming from you that is a meaningless statement?

In your opinion, that has no value to me.

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

No, she was an unarmed civilian trespassing in the capital buildings. If this officer had shot her anywhere else he'd be up on charges of murder.

If the person the cop killed was a black man you would be singing a much different tune.

No I wouldn't and don't put your racist bull shit on me. When you don't have an answer you pull the oh so overused racist card. Dumbass.

An unarmed woman was shot. Doesn't matter what color she was. She was UNARMED.

The police shoot and kill unarmed people all of the time, that's one of the major reasons why Black Lives Matter was founded.

Why are you so upset this time?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

No, she was an unarmed civilian trespassing in the capital buildings. If this officer had shot her anywhere else he'd be up on charges of murder.

If the person the cop killed was a black man you would be singing a much different tune.

No I wouldn't and don't put your racist bull shit on me. When you don't have an answer you pull the oh so overused racist card. Dumbass.

An unarmed woman was shot. Doesn't matter what color she was. She was UNARMED.

The police shoot and kill unarmed people all of the time, that's one of the major reasons why Black Lives Matter was founded.

Why are you so upset this time?

No they dont.

They shoot people who ignore their lawful commands, fight with them. Try to steal their weapons.

Until blacks become civilized human beings, they will always have this problem

 

[NewsVine_Mariyam]

The right decision! She was an insurrectionist, under orders from Trump, hell bent on overthrowing the government of the United States of America. She received exactly what she deserved by a patriotic officer defending our country.

She was not an insurretionist.

May you or one your family members wind up the same way she did.

You are scum.

She was a traitor who got what she deserved.

You deserve it more than she did.

The right decision! She was an insurrectionist, under orders from Trump, hell bent on overthrowing the government of the United States of America. She received exactly what she deserved by a patriotic officer defending our country.

She was not an insurretionist.

May you or one your family members wind up the same way she did.

You are scum.

She was a traitor who got what she deserved.

You deserve it more than she did.

Nope, I never attacked my own government.

Traitors do that.

I never attempted to subvert the Constitution in an attempt to prevent Congress from fulfilling their Constitutional obligation of certifying an election.

Traitors do that.

Ashli Targetpractice did that which makes her a traitor. She got what traitors deserve.

If she had attacked the government, it would be different. She might have been looking for a bathroom.

Did she have a gun ? If not, what was she going to do, sneeze on them.

She didn't attempt to subvert the constitution.

Keep trying, You low-lifes need an enema adminstered through a 38.

"She might have been looking for a bathroom".............and here we have the delusional rabbit hole that those inherently violent orange cultists have fallen down, folks.

"she was just sightseeing" </sarc>

 

[bodecea]

The right decision! She was an insurrectionist, under orders from Trump, hell bent on overthrowing the government of the United States of America. She received exactly what she deserved by a patriotic officer defending our country.

I agree. All people who do not obey orders of the Reich should be shot in the back like this women. Way to go.

You do realize that the so-called "Reich" which was in power when Babbit was shot was under the control of Republicans, right? There was a Republican president in power with a Republican Senate majority.

And you morons wonder why people laugh at you.

Well the President has no authority over what happens in Congress. The Dems controlled half that chamber and Nancy P order the Sgt of Arms of the House to rejected the Admin's offer for national guard before Jan 6, and then ordered the Cap Police to stand down on the 6th...then had her storm troopers kill this unarmed woman taking pics in a lobby.

That is not true. The fact is that for the National Guard to be called up, the executive branch has to approve. Pence ended up doing it because Trump dithered. She was not taking pictures. The video clearly shows she was part of a terrorist mob trying to break into the chambers. Quit lying.

Trump Offered to Deploy 10,000 National Guard Troops in DC Ahead of Jan. 6 - Mark Meadows | 09 Feb 2021 | Former President Donald Trump offered to deploy 10,000 National Guard troops in Washington D.C. prior to Jan. 6, the day of the Capitol building breach, according to former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows. Meadows told Fox News' "Sunday Morning Futures"that although Trump had been vocal about offering Capitol Police and National Guard presence at the Capitol on multiple occasions last month, his offer was rebuked "every time." "We also know that in January, but also throughout the summer, that the president was very vocal in making sure that we had plenty of National Guard, plenty of additional support because he supports our rule of law and supports our law enforcement and offered additional help," Meadows told host Maria Bartiromo. "Even in January, that was a given, as many as 10,000 National Guard troops were told to be on the ready by the Secretary of Defense" Meadows said. "That was a direct order from President Trump and yet here is what we see...all kinds of blame going around but yet not a whole lot of accountability."

Liar. They turned him down.

How interesting that that claim comes in February.....where was it in January?

Trump Offered to Deploy 10,000 National Guard Troops in DC Ahead of Jan. 6 - Mark Meadows
Right there.

the Epoch Times? that chinese cult rag. Oh! You funny!

 

[bodecea]

One thing I did notice...and I know there are many people upset by this decision...personally, I understand it...but I know folks are upset...yet not one person or group has looted, burnt, or assaulted anyone because of it...meanwhile...in Portland, and Minn.....

Did you just wake up from a deep deep sleep? Congress was looted and some members of Congress lost their possession. As for no one being assaulted, that was mainly because Congress folks were protected and moved by the security. Heck, talks were for the reps to be kidnapped and the VP to be hanged. That it did not happen was just pure luck.

Look at you shilling for the cops' "right" to gun down unarmed protestors. I knew you were a fascist.

You are shilling for a mob that launcehed a terrorist attack on our capitol. I shows you are a terrorist.

Definitely a "hide behind my keyboard" supporter.

 

[Rigby5]

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

So rioting is now a legitimate form of protest?

Rioting is ALWAYS a legitimate form of protest if nothing else has worked.
That is how the American Revolution started, as tax riots first.
There were legitimate draft riots during the Civil War, like in NYC.
There were legitimate civil rights riots in 1967.
There were legitimate Vietnam riots in the 1970's.
There should be far more riots.
The government is still wrongly killing people, and we need to stop that.
Like the War on Drugs, lying about Iraqi WMD, asset forfeiture, 3 strikes laws, etc.

 

[bodecea]

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

So rioting is now a legitimate form of protest?

It was in the summer and it is again in MN.

Protesting yes. Rioting and looting no.

That's rhe line.

Babbit was unarmed and murdered in cold blood while protesting against her government. Celebrate all you want, but you will reap what you sow.

So rioting is now a legitimate form of protest?

It was in the summer and it is again in MN.

No it wasn't. Only idiots think rioting is.

Are you serious?

Yes.

Rioting is not a valid form of protest.

Those who protested without engaging in violence, looting, arson and assault are protesters exercising their rights.

Those who engage in violence and assault and looting are committing a crime.

Why is that a hard concept for you?

Not as hard as objectivity is for you.

You realize, right, that coming from you that is a meaningless statement?

In your opinion, that has no value to me.

Devastating! How shall we go on???