Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He does need crowningHopefully, trump will be made king.
He does need crowningHopefully, trump will be made king.
I detect that Trump ass kissers are a bit "concerned" about Trump's future.
All I wanted for them to do is to read and understand 3 little sentences....and most of their responses are about "TDS"........I LOVE IT.......lol
LOL...
Claiming executive privilege over a report that is already public is as useless as it is dumb.
The public has access to the unredacted report?Claiming executive privilege over a report that is already public
Since when?
Well, obviously Mueller would not be testifying publicly to the redacted portions. No?
hopefully not.
seems that would be illegal.
So it appears the Executive Privilege will cover those parts as yet unseen.
No?
Then like I said. It's useless and dumb.
No link? No substance? Really?For the last several weeks the problem here...and throughout our nation....has been the refusal by many Trump acolytes to actually READ Mueller's report and....instead.....have relied of Barr's biased interpretation to "absolve" the guy who hired him to be hius stooge......
Since reading the report has proven a difficult task for most Trump followers, I offer just a few lines from Mueller that would.....at least to objective and sane voters......offer some measure of hesitation before reverting to the mindless support of someone who does not deserve such support....
For example, regarding "collusion," Mueller.explicitly states that "we applied the framework of conspiracy law not the concept of ‘collusion.’".
If one carefully reviews what Mueller wrote, the more appropriate conclusion is that Trump may be "innocent" of conspiracy.....but not necessarily exonerated from "collusion."
Further, Mueller makes it CLEAR as to which entity.....either the DOJ or Congress..... should utilize his investigation's findings, especially on the issue of obstruction, Mueller offers this:
"We concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."
Finally, there is this sentence in the report that is of major importance (something that Barr conveniently leaves out in his little summary):
“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would so state.”
Doesn't matter... Executive privilege has been invoked. He wont be answering questions for anyone..NO.......Mueller will soon be a private citizen asked to testify, assert and explain his investigation.......Actually, I DO hope that Trump tried to stifle his testimony, so that we can "conclude" that he is scared shitless of the truth.Doesn't matter... Executive privilege has been invoked. He wont be answering questions for anyone..
LOL...
Claiming executive privilege over a report that is already public is as useless as it is dumb.
The public has access to the unredacted report?Claiming executive privilege over a report that is already public
Since when?
Well, obviously Mueller would not be testifying publicly to the redacted portions. No?
What, exactly, is the point of having him testify about the parts that are public? You can just read them. THAT'S what he has to say, right there in the pages. So why do we need this kabuki theatre of "Mr. Mueller, are these your words? Were they the truth?" Seriously, can any of you desperate TDS'ers tell me specifically what it is you think is going to happen?
I detect that TDS'ers are desperate to believe their lives have meaning.
All I wanted them to do is understand that we read the sentences, and they're STILL WRONG.
Which is how we know they have TDS.
For the last several weeks the problem here...and throughout our nation....has been the refusal by many Trump acolytes to actually READ Mueller's report and....instead.....have relied of Barr's biased interpretation to "absolve" the guy who hired him to be hius stooge......
Since reading the report has proven a difficult task for most Trump followers, I offer just a few lines from Mueller that would.....at least to objective and sane voters......offer some measure of hesitation before reverting to the mindless support of someone who does not deserve such support....
For example, regarding "collusion," Mueller.explicitly states that "we applied the framework of conspiracy law not the concept of ‘collusion.’".
If one carefully reviews what Mueller wrote, the more appropriate conclusion is that Trump may be "innocent" of conspiracy.....but not necessarily exonerated from "collusion."
Further, Mueller makes it CLEAR as to which entity.....either the DOJ or Congress..... should utilize his investigation's findings, especially on the issue of obstruction, Mueller offers this:
"We concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."
Finally, there is this sentence in the report that is of major importance (something that Barr conveniently leaves out in his little summary):
“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would so state.”
[/QUO
Melt, bitch.For the last several weeks the problem here...and throughout our nation....has been the refusal by many Trump acolytes to actually READ Mueller's report and....instead.....have relied of Barr's biased interpretation to "absolve" the guy who hired him to be hius stooge......
Since reading the report has proven a difficult task for most Trump followers, I offer just a few lines from Mueller that would.....at least to objective and sane voters......offer some measure of hesitation before reverting to the mindless support of someone who does not deserve such support....
For example, regarding "collusion," Mueller.explicitly states that "we applied the framework of conspiracy law not the concept of ‘collusion.’".
If one carefully reviews what Mueller wrote, the more appropriate conclusion is that Trump may be "innocent" of conspiracy.....but not necessarily exonerated from "collusion."
Further, Mueller makes it CLEAR as to which entity.....either the DOJ or Congress..... should utilize his investigation's findings, especially on the issue of obstruction, Mueller offers this:
"We concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."
Finally, there is this sentence in the report that is of major importance (something that Barr conveniently leaves out in his little summary):
“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would so state.”
For the last several weeks the problem here...and throughout our nation....has been the refusal by many Trump acolytes to actually READ Mueller's report and....instead.....have relied of Barr's biased interpretation to "absolve" the guy who hired him to be hius stooge......
Since reading the report has proven a difficult task for most Trump followers, I offer just a few lines from Mueller that would.....at least to objective and sane voters......offer some measure of hesitation before reverting to the mindless support of someone who does not deserve such support....
For example, regarding "collusion," Mueller.explicitly states that "we applied the framework of conspiracy law not the concept of ‘collusion.’".
If one carefully reviews what Mueller wrote, the more appropriate conclusion is that Trump may be "innocent" of conspiracy.....but not necessarily exonerated from "collusion."
Further, Mueller makes it CLEAR as to which entity.....either the DOJ or Congress..... should utilize his investigation's findings, especially on the issue of obstruction, Mueller offers this:
"We concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."
Finally, there is this sentence in the report that is of major importance (something that Barr conveniently leaves out in his little summary):
“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would so state.”
[/QUO
The Russia investigation is over. No collusion. Case closed. Now, it is on to investigating the attempted coup. Thankfully, we have Barr to lead that investigation and bring justice to those who attempted to over turn an election.
What would be the chances that Mueller when OPENLY testifies before Congress will be asked to elaborate on those citations in the O/P???
Sad days ahead for you my dear Trump acolytes.....LOL
You have to wait for Barr to get his head out of trumps buttFor the last several weeks the problem here...and throughout our nation....has been the refusal by many Trump acolytes to actually READ Mueller's report and....instead.....have relied of Barr's biased interpretation to "absolve" the guy who hired him to be hius stooge......
Since reading the report has proven a difficult task for most Trump followers, I offer just a few lines from Mueller that would.....at least to objective and sane voters......offer some measure of hesitation before reverting to the mindless support of someone who does not deserve such support....
For example, regarding "collusion," Mueller.explicitly states that "we applied the framework of conspiracy law not the concept of ‘collusion.’".
If one carefully reviews what Mueller wrote, the more appropriate conclusion is that Trump may be "innocent" of conspiracy.....but not necessarily exonerated from "collusion."
Further, Mueller makes it CLEAR as to which entity.....either the DOJ or Congress..... should utilize his investigation's findings, especially on the issue of obstruction, Mueller offers this:
"We concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."
Finally, there is this sentence in the report that is of major importance (something that Barr conveniently leaves out in his little summary):
“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would so state.”
[/QUO
The Russia investigation is over. No collusion. Case closed. Now, it is on to investigating the attempted coup. Thankfully, we have Barr to lead that investigation and bring justice to those who attempted to over turn an election.
Doesn't matter... Executive privilege has been invoked. He wont be answering questions for anyone..Doesn't matter... Executive privilege has been invoked. He wont be answering questions for anyone..
LOL...
Claiming executive privilege over a report that is already public is as useless as it is dumb.
The public has access to the unredacted report?Claiming executive privilege over a report that is already public
Since when?
Well, obviously Mueller would not be testifying publicly to the redacted portions. No?
What, exactly, is the point of having him testify about the parts that are public? You can just read them. THAT'S what he has to say, right there in the pages. So why do we need this kabuki theatre of "Mr. Mueller, are these your words? Were they the truth?" Seriously, can any of you desperate TDS'ers tell me specifically what it is you think is going to happen?
To explain his thinking and his findings in his own words. To refute the narrative set by Trump and Barr and left to fester for a month. The very narrative you all are operating from and trying desperately to hold on to.
If you truly believe the report clears Trump, then why do you care?
How much did your ah's in congress waste on going after Hillary for 30 years ? And you morons aren't throughLOL...
Claiming executive privilege over a report that is already public is as useless as it is dumb.
The public has access to the unredacted report?Claiming executive privilege over a report that is already public
Since when?
Well, obviously Mueller would not be testifying publicly to the redacted portions. No?
What, exactly, is the point of having him testify about the parts that are public? You can just read them. THAT'S what he has to say, right there in the pages. So why do we need this kabuki theatre of "Mr. Mueller, are these your words? Were they the truth?" Seriously, can any of you desperate TDS'ers tell me specifically what it is you think is going to happen?
To explain his thinking and his findings in his own words. To refute the narrative set by Trump and Barr and left to fester for a month. The very narrative you all are operating from and trying desperately to hold on to.
If you truly believe the report clears Trump, then why do you care?
Once again, it's HIS report. It's 400 pages long, and he wrote it. If that's not telling us everything we need to know about "his thinking and his findings", then he's incompetent.
And how is he supposed to "refute the narrative", as you put it, without either lying to Congress, or admitting he lied in his report? And how is it part of his job description to "refute narratives", anyway? Is he a fucking prosecutor, or is he a political operative? Because I seem to recall being assured, ad nauseam, that he was an impartial professional who could be trusted, way back when you dipshits were screaming for him and crowing about how he was going to "get Trump".
This might come as a shock to you, what with your advanced and terminal (we can hope, anyway) case of Trump Derangement Syndrome, but SANE ADULTS care about more than your endless political show: getting back to the serious business of the country, not wasting taxpayer money on your never-ending tantrum, stuff like that.
I detect that TDS'ers are desperate to believe their lives have meaning.
All I wanted them to do is understand that we read the sentences, and they're STILL WRONG.
Which is how we know they have TDS.
TDS....?????...........WOW, how fucking "original"........LMAO
(what a parroting moron....)
Melt, bitch.
Above, an example of right wing and Trump ass kissing "intelligentsia".......LOL
How much did your ah's in congress waste on going after Hillary for 30 years ? And you morons aren't through
No obstruction , no collusion.For the last several weeks the problem here...and throughout our nation....has been the refusal by many Trump acolytes to actually READ Mueller's report and....instead.....have relied of Barr's biased interpretation to "absolve" the guy who hired him to be hius stooge......
Since reading the report has proven a difficult task for most Trump followers, I offer just a few lines from Mueller that would.....at least to objective and sane voters......offer some measure of hesitation before reverting to the mindless support of someone who does not deserve such support....
For example, regarding "collusion," Mueller.explicitly states that "we applied the framework of conspiracy law not the concept of ‘collusion.’".
If one carefully reviews what Mueller wrote, the more appropriate conclusion is that Trump may be "innocent" of conspiracy.....but not necessarily exonerated from "collusion."
Further, Mueller makes it CLEAR as to which entity.....either the DOJ or Congress..... should utilize his investigation's findings, especially on the issue of obstruction, Mueller offers this:
"We concluded that Congress has authority to prohibit a President's corrupt use of his authority in order to protect the integrity of the administration of justice."
Finally, there is this sentence in the report that is of major importance (something that Barr conveniently leaves out in his little summary):
“If we had confidence after a thorough investigation of the facts that the president clearly did not commit obstruction of Justice we would so state.”
