No, Chansley Was Not Escorted Into the Capitol Building

[The5thHorseman]

If it was, Trog, it was the strangest one in history:

1. The insurrectionists came peacefully until attacked and provoked.
2. The insurrectionists came with no weapons.
3. In many instances, they were invited in and escorted around peaceably.
4. The government in power to overthrow at the time was the very one they supported.

Mitch McConnell used the word..

He was there.

 

[Nostra]

LOL

Cries the dumbfuck whose ass I've been kicking up and down the forum. Hey, I know, tell me how this is a flagpole, not a rifle.

Your meltdown is cute, Buttercup.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Your story always changes when your dumbassery is called out.

Tell us why the DOJ wouldn’t have those security videos because the Houes had them.

Watch the worm squirm….

Are these the videos you are watching on Tucker, while you're never watching FOX?

 

[Nostra]

Nostra is the kind of moron who believes he can intuit the facts.

Another Dimtard with ZERO critical thinking skills.

 

[Nostra]

Are these the videos you are watching on Tucker, while you're never watching FOX?

Have I ever claimed I never watch Fox?

Do you have any coherent thoughts, Dumbfuck?

 

[The5thHorseman]

Another Dimtard with ZERO critical thinking skills.

Did you intuit that?

 

[Nostra]

Mitch McConnell used the word..

He was there.

How does Turtle’s nutsack smell?

Nevermind, I don’t want to know.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Have I ever claimed I never watch Fox?

Do you have any coherent thoughts, Dumbfuck?

Another Dimtard with ZERO critical thinking skills.

Have I ever claimed I never watch Fox?

Back to back.

 

[The5thHorseman]

How does Tutle’s nutsack smell?

Nevermind, I don’t want to know.

That's funny, Grifter Fluffer.

McConnell, as I said, was there.

 

[Faun]

Have you found anyone who claimed he was “escorted into” the Capitol?

Yeah, BuffaloHead said that.

‘QAnon Shaman’ wanted to create ‘positive’ vibes when storming Capitol

Jacob Chansley — the bare-chested Arizona man who wore a furry headdress, horns, and elaborate face paint during the Jan. 6 riot — told “60 Minutes” in his first comments from jail that…

nypost.com

The lone regret Chansley has, he said, was believing that he was allowed into the Captiol after being “waved in” by police officers, giving him the impression that his actions were permitted, according to the report.​

 

[Nostra]

Back to back.

 

[Nostra]

Yeah, BuffaloHead said that.

‘QAnon Shaman’ wanted to create ‘positive’ vibes when storming Capitol

Jacob Chansley — the bare-chested Arizona man who wore a furry headdress, horns, and elaborate face paint during the Jan. 6 riot — told “60 Minutes” in his first comments from jail that…

nypost.com

​

The lone regret Chansley has, he said, was believing that he was allowed into the Captiol after being “waved in” by police officers, giving him the impression that his actions were permitted, according to the report.​

Now show us where he said he was “escorted” into the Capitol, Simp.

 

[Faun]

Your story always changes when your dumbassery is called out.

Tell us why the DOJ wouldn’t have those security videos because the House had them.

Watch the worm squirm….

LOL

Dumbfuck, exactly how big of a glutton for punishment are ya? I said it could have been that prosecutors were not in possession of these videos when BuffaloHead pled guilty; and you're sooo ******* brain-dead, your mental deformity led you to think I meant prosecutors had no other evidence at all beyond what they got from the House.

Savvy?

I changed nothing. I said the above... which led you to ask me if I was saying the DoJ only had evidence provided by the House... to which I fed you rope to hang yourself by merely saying, no, and not expanding upon that... and as expected, you did indeed hang yourself on the idiocy of that being the only logical conclusion; when in fact, it was far from it.

You're the gift that keeps on givin', Dumbfuck.

 

[The5thHorseman]

Now show us where he said he was “escorted” into the Capitol, Simp.

I always see you demanding to be shown, but never acknowledging when you are.

And as far as answering questions, you're a sniveling coward.

 

[Faun]

Now show us where he said he was “escorted” into the Capitol, Simp.

LOLOLOLOL

Cries the forum dumbfuck who calls walking past police, a "guided tour."

Holyfuckingshit!

You're cracking me up, Dumbfuck!!

 

[BackAgain]

False. The judge determines what is and isn't exculpatory.

False. The decision is made from the perspective of the defense attorney. I’m some disputes, the court can intercede. But even then deference is paid to the defense perspective.

It would help things enormously if you’d at least try to be accurate.

If the defense thinks that exculpatory evidence has been withheld, they need to argue that to a judge who will also get a chance to hear from the prosecution to determine if there has been a violation of Brady v Maryland. Still, it never went to trial. I do not see that Brady v Maryland requires the prosecution to turn over all evidence before a person take a plea deal. It wouldn't make that much sense anyway. Taking a plea deal means you're admitting guilt. Why would you need evidence against you to determine if you committed a crime? As the perpetrator, you would be the one who knows what you did.

You don’t know what you’re talking about. These violations often arise after a trial. Here it was after a plea. The government had all those videos. They had been demanded by defense counsel. But the prosecution failed to turn them over. So, a discovery violation and a Brady violation.

You're stepping on a few rakes here, so I'll do my best to point them out. One, if it was just the House that had them, then there wouldn't be a problem with Brady v Maryland which applies to the prosecution, not to Congress.

False. That which is the possession of the House is I. The possession of the government. The possession is thus absolutely attributable to the prosecution.

You can't claim a violation of Brady because Congress didn't turn over evidence.

Yes. I can. And the defense is. And they’re right.

But that doesn't matter, because you're already wrong. The DoJ did have the tapes. The fact that they didn't release them publicly does not mean they haven't been released to the defendants.

Then the prosecution would be expected to reply, “we did turn it over.” But they aren’t saying that because … they didn’t.

Tapes are made public through the trials when they're used in trials for evidentiary purposes.

I don’t care about being made public. They should have been turned over to the defense upon the defense demand. And the defendant is not even obliged to specifically ask for Brady material.

Last, the defense didn't "object" to anything in court. They went to the media and made that claim, where we all know there's no repercussions for straight up lying about this. So when Chansley's lawyer files in court stating that they didn't get the videos, I'll take their claims seroiusly. For now, they're just running their mouths to get on TV. The fact that Chansley's lawyer hasn't filed on this (not saying they won't, it's only been a week, so I'm patient), is also the reason that the prosecution hasn't denied it to them. Because the DoJ speaks through court filings.

You seem pretty sure about what the defense has or hasn’t filed. Link?

But wait! The piece of garbage Domonic Pezzola did make this claim in court and the DoJ did have the chance to reply. And you know what? The DoJ states in their court filing that they did indeed give these videos to Chansley.

View attachment 765747

US DOJ Response to Pezzola

www.documentcloud.org

If (and I applaud your ability to share that final bit of information) it is true that the material had been shared, with the defendant, then I would agree with you.

But, of course, it isn’t clear that the prosecution reply is accurate as to that co-defendant’s motion. Assuming it is true, then the DOJ has clean hands as to that portion of discovery and as to the Brady claim.

We shall see.

 

[Nostra]

LOLOLOLOL

Cries the forum dumbfuck who calls walking past police, a "guided tour."

Holyfuckingshit!

You're cracking me up, Dumbfuck!!

I accept your admission you are a lying sack of shit.

If not, quote him saying he was “escorted into” the Capitol.

Bring the quote. Bullshit spin and emojis won’t cover your blatant lie, liar.

GO!

 

[Grumblenuts]

LOL

Spear...

Spear...

Someone posted a cop's video from behind as this narcissistic dope was being ushered OUT of the Senate Chamber. Turns out it was not a simple spear one could find easily online, but yours was a great guess considering how little there was to go on. Your image also shows that he simply zip tied the flag to the spearhead. I haven't been able to see under the flag from any angle well enough to confirm that the bottom was zip tied as well, but seeing as he couldn't even be bothered trimming off the excess on the top one, I think it's a safe bet.

Now, looking carefully, one can see that he jambed a steel spearhead on top of a bronze headed spear, I would venture to make it as tall as himself when resting on the floor. The handle appears to be black and wooden with some wooly fringe wrapped around the top.

So far, I have not found an exact match for either spearhead nor the handle. One can see how minimal the "Viking" hat is from this angle. Looks like three fox tails and two bison horns glued to a piece of cardboard for stiffness, then stapled to a black ski hat.

The guy clearly has some crafting skills, money, and loves seeing himself in mirrors.. especially if it looks like he might have thick hair on top of his head. LOL

 

[Grumblenuts]

On second thought, it could just be a single, long spear with a very fancy handle. Why they'd ever let some nut walk around the Capitol with that thing though sure beats the hell out of me!

 

[Nostra]

I accept your admission you are a lying sack of shit.

If not, quote him saying he was “escorted into” the Capitol.

Bring the quote. Bullshit spin and emojis won’t cover your blatant lie, liar.

GO!

That was easy.